Roosevelt Hotel
#5
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I stayed at the Roosevelt a little over a year ago. It was a real let down for me after having just stayed at the New York Hilton. The area around there wasn't as nice, and although the lobby is beautiful, our room(and we tried more than one) was just okay. The bathroom seemed very old and the windows were not clean. It was just dreary I guess-not bad, but I'd shop around a bit.
#6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
have stayed at the Roosevelt and above posters are accurate. It's satisfactory and practical. We like the location-right by Grand Central. Lately, we have stayed at a Super 8, which is even more basic that the Roosevelt, but you cant beat the price or location. for us, when we go to NYC, we basically just sleep at our hotel and are on the go from early in the morning til late at night so location and basic cleanliness rule, along with price (we'd rather spend our money doing things than on the hotel).
#7
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
# Celebrate Summer in the Big Apple with The Roosevelt Hotel. When you book two nights at only $199 per night*, you will receive:
# Two American Breakfasts each day
# Two packed lunches each day
# A THIRD night's accommodations
...for FREE!
To book this great summer package, use promo code: ASNY0405.
# Two American Breakfasts each day
# Two packed lunches each day
# A THIRD night's accommodations
...for FREE!
To book this great summer package, use promo code: ASNY0405.
#8
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Roosevelt is a large, older traditional hotel in a great location - unless you want to be right in the middle of Times Square. Don;t expect luxury - people generally take it for the price and the location - close to
Grand Central and all transport - great for museums and better shopping.
It's fine - but not exciting, trendy or luxurious. If you are not getting a great rate (for NYC at that exact time) I would look further.
Grand Central and all transport - great for museums and better shopping.
It's fine - but not exciting, trendy or luxurious. If you are not getting a great rate (for NYC at that exact time) I would look further.
#9
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did not care it and feel that there are nuch better choices in Manhattan for the price.
I do not have a problem with "old" but did not the hotel to be particularly well maintained or it needs updating.
I do not have a problem with "old" but did not the hotel to be particularly well maintained or it needs updating.
#10
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I stayed at the Roosevelt in Dec. '03. Yes, it is an older hotel, but the renovations make it quite charming. You can't beat the location and the service was very good. I would definitely stay there again.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bonlou30
United States
5
Aug 22nd, 2007 09:54 PM
Graziella5b
United States
5
Jul 5th, 2007 02:24 PM