HIP Hotel in New York
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
HIP Hotel in New York
At the last minute we will be in New York this weekend and need some advice on hotels please. We have been before but stayed near central park and the theater district, would like to stay in the village, SOHO, or someplace less touristy with good boutique shopping and quaint restaurants. I looked at the SOHO grand, 60 Thompson, and liked them. Was wondering about the area the 2 Ian Schrager hotels were in and the W Hotels. Would like a HIP hotel in a good area if anyone has any advice. Thanks SO Much!
#2
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
I've stayed at the Soho Grand a few times, and really liked it. The hotel and rooms are very cool, and the location is great.
I've never stayed at the W Hotel, but I've had drinks at the one in Union Square. That is a GREAT location. I wouldn't hesitate to stay there. I'd say it's probably in the "hippest" location of all the W's.
I've never stayed at the W Hotel, but I've had drinks at the one in Union Square. That is a GREAT location. I wouldn't hesitate to stay there. I'd say it's probably in the "hippest" location of all the W's.
#4
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Hi. My husband and I will be in NYC later this month and we are looking to stay in a "hip" hotel. We've stayed at two Ian Schrager properties in London, so something along those lines.
Heard good things about the W hotel. We're going to be in New York after 3 years and would appreciate any suggestion.
Thanks, Aarti
Heard good things about the W hotel. We're going to be in New York after 3 years and would appreciate any suggestion.
Thanks, Aarti
#5
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Try the Soho House New York [UK members club]. Rooms are available for non-members [I'm pretty sure] and they are fantastic.
www.sohohouseny.com
www.sohohouseny.com
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
IMO, the choice between the Soho Grand and W Union Square comes down to which location you prefer. Both are great hotels in great locations, so I would suggest thinking about where you want to spend most of your time and then decide which place is nearer to those things.
Both are very close to subway stations, so transportation to other parts of the city is easy.
Both are very close to subway stations, so transportation to other parts of the city is easy.
#9
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,112
Likes: 0
traveling101, I always stay with a friend who lives a block from the Tribeca Grand, so I can tell you anything you want to know about the location. Some of the advantages:
* If you want to take the subway, one line is right in front of the hotel and 2 other lines are very close by -- very convenient.
* It is really easy to get a taxi at that location. I don't think I've ever waited more than 3 minutes except during afternoon rush hour when the cabs coming up from the financial district are all full.
* There are lots of excellent little restaurants in the neighborhood.
* SoHo is a short walk away (also Little Italy and Chinatown and the cheapo stuff on Canal St.)
Disadvantages: only one IMO and that is that it's a long ride uptown if you are going farther than midtown.
I have been staying in that area for at least 15 years and have really seen the neighborhood change. I love it.
* If you want to take the subway, one line is right in front of the hotel and 2 other lines are very close by -- very convenient.
* It is really easy to get a taxi at that location. I don't think I've ever waited more than 3 minutes except during afternoon rush hour when the cabs coming up from the financial district are all full.
* There are lots of excellent little restaurants in the neighborhood.
* SoHo is a short walk away (also Little Italy and Chinatown and the cheapo stuff on Canal St.)
Disadvantages: only one IMO and that is that it's a long ride uptown if you are going farther than midtown.
I have been staying in that area for at least 15 years and have really seen the neighborhood change. I love it.
#10
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Not sure what you have been seeing for prices from the Soho Grand, but I received an e-mail from Cheap Tickets that is advertising a one day "sale" for the SG at $260 for a Superior Queen, and 289.99 for a grand king. Of course shop around - I don't know how much of a "sale" this actually is. I plugged in dates for the weekend and they do have rooms at this rate.
#11
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 0
I am interested in these postings as I am currently looking for a "somewhat hip" hotel to take my 11 yr old daughter to for a March weekend. The reason I say "somewhat hip" is that I stayed at the Royalton on business awhile back (at request of the client I was with) and it was WAY too hip for me- sleeping on a matress basically on the floor was too much for me, and I felt like I was in a cave instead of a room w/the slate floor, dark lighting, etc. Are the hotels you are mentioning above "cool" in nature but not "hip" in the way the Royalton was? I like normal beds and decent lighting and a little less attitude, but woudl like to be a hip Mom for my kid.
#13
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 0
Marilyn: Good suggestion, but I always do that (somewhat of a compulsive traveler), and the problem w/the Ian S. hotels is there aren't pictures of the rooms on the site- all kinds of pics of the lobby and bar, dining and public areas- but I never saw anything about the beds being on the floor til I opened the door to the room and was "floored" more or less.
#15
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
I would say the Soho Grand probably is hip in the way emd defines it. The bed was a queen, but shorter than normal (probably because of the small room size). My 6'0 tall husband had a little trouble fitting on it!
Also, the room was fairly dark, I think there were only table lamps, and the closet had a beaded metal "curtain" which was fairly noisy! But, I think any "hip" NYC hotel is going to have touches like this. I thought it was a cool place to stay.
Also, the room was fairly dark, I think there were only table lamps, and the closet had a beaded metal "curtain" which was fairly noisy! But, I think any "hip" NYC hotel is going to have touches like this. I thought it was a cool place to stay.
#16
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
emd, we have stayed at Hudson (loved it and we are hardly part of the "hip" crowd!) but the beds were the platform type and the lighing was dim, two things that I know are on your "NOT" list! Thought I would let you know in case you came across a nice rate and were attempted to book! I don't know what you were budgeting, or what you were looking at for a location, but what about the Maritime Hotel in Chelsea? There are some good reviews for it on TripAdvisor.
#18
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
I think the W Union square would probably suit your "hip but not too" needs - the rooms are small but not tiny. The Maritime is painfully hip - and is quite the scene now with two very hot restaurants and a hopping bar scene (I live 2 blocks away). I think they only have queen size beds - but I could be wrong . . . You might also check out the Giraffe Hotel, which has contemporary designed decor and very nice one bedroom suites with sofa beds . . . for pretty reasonable rates. It's in the upper Flatiron/gramercy park neighborhood - good access to midtown and downtown . . . .
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bonlou30
United States
5
Aug 22nd, 2007 09:54 PM




