dress code clarification?
Jan 8th, 2005, 02:45 PM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dress code clarification?
What is the difference between "casual," "business casual," "smart casual," "smart chic," and "casual dressy?" I've seen all these terms on various web sites and am now scratching my noggin. A small group of us are coming to NYC next week and we'd like to avoid looking like morons (at least in the fasion sense - I don't expect help in other areas!) We're not booked into any "jacket required" restaurants, but if there's a fashion blunder you could help us avoid, we'd appreciate it.
Jan 8th, 2005, 03:17 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Casual: Anything goes but please don't wear your sweats.
Business Casual: men in jacket without tie and without socks.
Smart Casual: See above and wear eyeglasses.
Smart Chic: Seven Jeans, stilletos, boucle jacket, and eyeglasses.
Casual Dressy: See above and subtract eyeglasses.
Business Casual: men in jacket without tie and without socks.
Smart Casual: See above and wear eyeglasses.
Smart Chic: Seven Jeans, stilletos, boucle jacket, and eyeglasses.
Casual Dressy: See above and subtract eyeglasses.
Jan 8th, 2005, 03:18 PM
#4
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I hear casual, I generally think that anything goes, although in NYC if I wear jeans, they're dark ones. The other terms all mean the same to me ... generally no jeans, dark colored, well-fitting pants and a nice top or sweater. This will do very well in almost all NYC establishments. If it's a warm weather location, I'd go with lighter color pants, capris or skirt.
Jan 8th, 2005, 03:22 PM
#5
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Casual is jeans and tee/polo shirts. Busines casual is khakis or nice cords and a shirt with a collar. (For women nice skirt or trousers and a quality sweater/top/jacket.) Smart casual is trendier - but not dressier - lots of black and luxe fabics (leather, cashmere, silk).
Don;t know smart chic - seems redundant to me. And casual dressy is just ridiculous - unless you're planning on putting sequins on your jeans.
If you're asking about better restaurants at dinner time - for men nice slacks and sweater (or blazer if you like). For women smart slacks, heels or smashing boots and a cashmere sweater or silk blouse are fine. subsitute a smart skirt if you like - but in the winter you're generally better with slacks. And for everything - black is better.
Don;t know smart chic - seems redundant to me. And casual dressy is just ridiculous - unless you're planning on putting sequins on your jeans.
If you're asking about better restaurants at dinner time - for men nice slacks and sweater (or blazer if you like). For women smart slacks, heels or smashing boots and a cashmere sweater or silk blouse are fine. subsitute a smart skirt if you like - but in the winter you're generally better with slacks. And for everything - black is better.
Jan 8th, 2005, 03:46 PM
#6
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't get too hung up on how to dress. I agree with CyberUK: Dress 'neat' and you'll be fine - avoid sweatshirts and jeans for evening dinner.
Enjoy all NYC has to offer! I've been to restaraunts in NY wearing casual pants and a sweater...across from a woman in a formal dress!
Enjoy all NYC has to offer! I've been to restaraunts in NY wearing casual pants and a sweater...across from a woman in a formal dress!
Jan 8th, 2005, 03:55 PM
#7
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting thread as in SF this past holiday season 80% of the women had on jeans, usually with strappy highheeled sandles and great looking tops and jackets. It seemed as though the rest of the women had on black pantsuits.
The fellows seemed waaaay underdressed for these restaurants.
This in the good restaurants around Union Square. My daughter said at North Beach it was nothing (so to speak) but jeans with casual tops and jackets.
The European womens jeans of course looked more stylish.
The fellows seemed waaaay underdressed for these restaurants.
This in the good restaurants around Union Square. My daughter said at North Beach it was nothing (so to speak) but jeans with casual tops and jackets.
The European womens jeans of course looked more stylish.
Jan 8th, 2005, 04:09 PM
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all your input - I'll pass it along to the rest of our party. I know they're at home packing as we speak. (And re: the men/women - I've noticed that in a lot of places we go as well. I think women are more likely to make an event of an outing by making an extra effort with their appearance and are also more likely to sacrifice comfort for style. I mean, can you see a guy wearing the Manolo Blahniks etc. from Sex and the City?)
Jan 8th, 2005, 04:14 PM
#9
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
igetaround - LOL. Actually while I was having cocktails and enjoying looking at the various tables (and also at dinner) I thought the women had all made an effort and the guys - well they basically looked a little underdressed for a round of golf. Too funny!!!! 
Jan 8th, 2005, 05:28 PM
#11
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given the choice between looking like a moron (to quote the OP) and knowing what "casual dressy" means, I'd just as soon choose the former. When I go to NYC, I just pack all my black stuff and that's usually fine.
