Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Bay area as home base

Search

Bay area as home base

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6th, 2010 | 09:15 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Bay area as home base

Further to an earlier post, my husband and I are planning a road trip from Vancouver, Canada to California. We would like to travel as far south as Carmel (for golf). If we were to use the Bay area as a Home base for part of our trip, which neighborhood would you suggest in SF (or outside)? We will have a vehicle so parking is a must-we would like a place with easy access to the freeway for day-trips and close to transit (MUNI-BART) while in SF. We plan to be in the Bay area for 7-10 days. Options we are considering include Sausilito, Pacific Heights, Noe Valley and the Mission. We are very open to other suggestions from fellow Fodorites.
pirouette is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2010 | 09:59 PM
  #2  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
My only thought about Sausilito, every time you come into City or drive South, you will have to pay toll .
Friends stayed in Noe Valley area for a few days and did side trips..Seemed convenient for them..
Good Luck


























1
traveler24 is offline  
Old Apr 7th, 2010 | 09:07 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 26,243
Likes: 0
Noe Valley is a great residential neighborhood, especially close to 24th Street, which has great shopping, restaurants, strolling, etc. It started out as very much a "working-class" neighborhood, as opposed to Pacific Heights, which is and was much more wealthy/upscale. There are many mansions in Pacific Heights - not so in Noe Valley.

As far as the Mission goes, parts of it would be great, parts of it not so great, so I wouldn't choose there unless you know exactly where the lodgings would be and could post them here first.

Sausalito is very nice, but I personally wouldn't choose to stay outside the city.
sf7307 is offline  
Old Apr 7th, 2010 | 09:34 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,044
Likes: 0
I don't think of SF as a good base. The traffic in/out of the city can be horrendous and would really detract from my enjoyment.

I would stay in SF to see SF. Then move on.
Placename is offline  
Old Apr 7th, 2010 | 09:39 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
I agree with Placename.
Shanti is offline  
Old Apr 7th, 2010 | 09:42 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 26,243
Likes: 0
Whether SF is a good base depends on where you want to go while staying here. If you want to do San Francisco, Sausalito, Muir Woods, Berkeley, Palo Alto/Stanford, then San Francisco IS a good base IMO. If you mean to do day trips as far as Carmel, then no, it's not --- stay in SF for 3 or 4 days and then move to Monterey/Carmel for a few days.
sf7307 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
andreadee
United States
6
Aug 3rd, 2011 05:50 AM
abrianthodges
United States
6
Dec 2nd, 2010 08:50 PM
OahuTransplant
United States
12
Dec 3rd, 2005 09:14 PM
JanePost
United States
6
Jun 9th, 2004 10:26 AM
Mer
United States
9
Jan 14th, 2003 10:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -