Verseille or Fontanbleu

May 7th, 2011, 04:21 AM
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,020
Verseille or Fontanbleu

With limited time in Paris which would you suggest for history buffs?
lauramsgarden is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 04:40 AM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,339
No doubt Versailles - not only much much more impressive than Fontainebleu IMO but its parks and gardens are so to - like Marie Antonette's little hamlet she created to play being a shephardess, etc. But Versailles palace was the seat of the French kings for so so long so it reeks of history in every stone and the city itself has some relics of that era like the place where American ambassadors like Benjamin Franklin stayed, etc.

IMO there is really no comparison and this is not saying Fontainebleu is not impressive as well but it ain't no Versailled.

And Versailles is much closer to Paris - in fact a part of the Paris conturbation really - fontaineblue harder to reach as you take a train to Fontainebleu-Avon station and then it's a mile or so to the palace - RER C of the Paris metro takes you right to the gates of Versailles palace.

Get a Paris Museum Pass IMO to avoid long lines with preferential admission gates and also to use in paris - just visitng the main museums and Versailles will save you tons of money and time in line like at Louvre again you have a special entrance sidestepping oft long long lines at ticket windows. Buy the pass at any museum - I often buy mine at a lesser museum with no ticket lines.
PalenQ is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 04:41 AM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,339
Paris Museum Pass | Official Website
The PARIS MUSEUM PASS gives you free and direct access to over 60 museums ... Cité de l'Architecture et du Patrimoine - Musée des Monuments français Cité de ...
Price - Presentation and Advantages - Points of sale - How to Use it
PalenQ is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 04:59 AM
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,608
Depends on what kind of history buffs you are. Most history buffs have interest in specific historical figures, and then it is a question of going to where those persons were located, not just the biggest and most impressive château.

Louis XV got married at Fontenblow, and Napoleon lived there. Louis XIII and XIV spent their lives at Ver-sigh.
kerouac is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 06:37 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 46,728
If you're truly a history buff, then the particular history of the place should dictate which one you go to. Even if you're not, I should think knowing the distinctions between two entirely different historical venues would make a difference in your choice, not what the buildings/grounds look like.

BTW, it's Versailles and Fontainebleau.
StCirq is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 07:04 AM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,339
if history is equal for your interests then Versailles IMO has far far nicer palace and grounds - and this is not saying that Fontainebleau ain't nice either but Versailles offers a lot more - Marie Antoninette's Hameau and on sundays in summers the water fountains are dancing to piped in classical music, etc.
PalenQ is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 07:16 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,358
Read up on the history of Vaux-le-Vicomte on the web site. It comes alive when you visit the chateau.
RonZ is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 07:37 AM
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,056
I liked Malmaison.
tarquin is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 07:43 AM
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 20,752
For history, Fontainebleau which was started as a Renaissance palace and was favored by Napoleon I. One of the main tours, which we did not take, is through the apartments of Napoleon.
Michael is online now  
May 7th, 2011, 12:25 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 33,607
I agree that a history buff would probably know about them and would decide based on which appealed to one's interests. But if you aren't really that well-versed in French history, they both have historical connections, you can't deny that, but of course Versailles is more important historically. If you want to know which is more manageable, I'd say Fontainebleau because it is so much smaller. I find Napoleon an interesting character, so was particularly interested in Fonatainebleau. It is very beautiful and has nice gardens.
Christina is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 01:05 PM
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,525
Agree that Versailles is more dramatic, opulent, large gardens..and crowds to match.

When I visited Fontainebleau they were still renovating rooms. Because I was the only person there, the guide took me on a behind the rope tour, including non-renovated rooms.

Napoleon abdicated from there, the first time.

Since they are of a different scale, I'd say if you want small and intimate...Fontainebleau. It would also be a shorter visit. The chateau is right on town, and the grounds are OK.

For a first visit, I'd choose Versailles
Michel_Paris is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 02:32 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 82
As mentioned, if you're interested in history, both will be fascinating.

But for a first visit, I'd go with Versailles as well, which will take a full day. I bought the admission/train fare combo in Paris, and that was great for skipping the lines. Versailles is bigger, has more to see and it's better preserved, though of course it is more crowded. In terms of luxury, Fontainebleu doesn't really compare, and it's not as well preserved and looks rather drab, though it was still interesting to me as a history buff.
blakejared is offline  
May 7th, 2011, 04:10 PM
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,020
thanks everyone. Forgive my speling erors - as you can see, spelling has never been my strength, plus my keyboard is sticking

historically Fontainebleau is probably more interesting as we both are fascinated by Napoleon, but the ease of getting to Versailles (plus the gardens) may tip the balance. Thanks
lauramsgarden is offline  
Related Topics
Original Poster
Last Post
Dec 23rd, 2016 07:21 AM
Nov 5th, 2012 05:12 PM
May 21st, 2008 11:17 AM
May 30th, 2007 04:17 PM
Débora Krebs
Jun 21st, 2000 08:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 PM.