evangelina

If you had only 2 or 3 days which place would you choose to visit(Glasgow or Edinbrough)? Which city would be more interesting to get a general idea of Scotland in a short time? If anyone has a favorite, please let me know and why. I want to get Scotland into my England visit and I only have a few extra days. Thanks for any advice anyone might have to share.

jent103

I've never been to Glasgow, but do think Edinburgh would be a great intro to Scotland. There's so much history there, plus it's easy to do a day trip to Stirling or St Andrews if you like.

rkkwan

Edinburgh, for sure. Lots more to see in terms of historical sites as well as vista.

cshellen

My sister and I went to both... Edinburgh is without question the more beautiful and historic city. We had a lot of fun in Glasgow, but it was mostly because of the people. The city itself is like the Scranton of Scotland - grey, dingy and meandering.

historytraveler

Iwould agree that Edinburgh is probably the best choice if you only have time to visit one. But,Glasgow as grey, dingy, meandering. Ouch! I really don't think so.

janisj

There is a lot to see/do in Glasgow. But there is much more to see/do in Edinburgh and the view of the castle looming over the entire city is unforgettable.

If you had 5 nights - then 2 in Glasgow and 3 in Edinburgh would be great. But w/ only 2 or 3 days total - Edinburgh for sure . . . .

sharon1306

I'd been contemplating between the two cities too, and I’d decided on Edinburgh… . Looks like that’s the consensus here. We also have only 3 nights, and had to pick between the two.

cshellen

I knew I'd get in trouble for my description of Glasgow. Apologies - my sister and I really enjoyed the city (and LOVED the people), but it just paled in comparison to the shiny beauty and grand monuments of Edinburgh.

hanl

Agree that while both merit a visit, if you only have time to see one, make it Edinburgh (most beautiful city in the UK, in my -biased- opinion).

sheila

Edinburgh for pretty. Glasgow for soul.

alanRow

It's only an hour by train or bus between the two so staying in one & visiting the other isn't a problem

JoeTro

I prefer Edinburgh, but Glasgow has great museums.

LondonFan1

If by "get a general idea of Scotland in a short time" the original poster means get to know Scottish people, I recommend Glasgow. The people I met there were super friendly and open, especially for Brits. Edinburgh has high culture and high art and high prices, plus tons of tourists. Glasgow feels more like a city where ordinary people live.

janisj

For a 2 day stay in the States would you choose San Francisco or Pittsburgh? Nothing at all wrong w/ Pittsburgh and the people are great but San Francisco is a world famous destination for good reason. Same w/ Glasgow v Edinburgh.

BTW - you won't get a "general idea" about Scotland if your time is limited to either city.