backpacks europe
#2
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
Will your backpacks be your only luggage? They make no sense to me, compared to a "rollaboard" but I'll concede that it might be a personal preference.
There are many good threads on how (not so) much to pack to make your trip more enjoyable.
Here's an olde but goodie, even if it is lengthy:
http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...p;tid=34441925
You may find that you find a lot of good information for backpackers at the ThornTree forum(s) of www.lonelyplanet.com
Best wishes,
Rex
There are many good threads on how (not so) much to pack to make your trip more enjoyable.
Here's an olde but goodie, even if it is lengthy:
http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...p;tid=34441925
You may find that you find a lot of good information for backpackers at the ThornTree forum(s) of www.lonelyplanet.com
Best wishes,
Rex
#3
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,188
Likes: 0
Also the forums at:
www.eurotrip.com
www.guideforeurope.com
www.bugeurope.com
I haven't used backpacks yet, but my kids like them better than suitcases.
www.eurotrip.com
www.guideforeurope.com
www.bugeurope.com
I haven't used backpacks yet, but my kids like them better than suitcases.
#4
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Advantages of backpack vs rollaboard. Just one cats opinion.
They don't get rolled through dog doo in the dark. (I witnessed this in Paris.)
Much easier to carry up stairs.
Easier to lift onto trains. (Just do not turn around with it on your back.)
I can sprint with my 10kg on my back to track #187 in the alloted three minutes. (I am way past early 30s.)
Disadvantages are for short backed women ( due to sizeing)or for aging or weaker backs.
Take your pick and be happy.
They don't get rolled through dog doo in the dark. (I witnessed this in Paris.)
Much easier to carry up stairs.
Easier to lift onto trains. (Just do not turn around with it on your back.)
I can sprint with my 10kg on my back to track #187 in the alloted three minutes. (I am way past early 30s.)
Disadvantages are for short backed women ( due to sizeing)or for aging or weaker backs.
Take your pick and be happy.
#6
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 0
We switched to backpacks for a train trip last fall, Amsterdam-Cologne-Rhine-Basel-Luzern-Zurich. It was very easy to maneuver the train system and the bags were always small enough to keep by or above our seats (instead of the luggage storage). All of our hotels were within 0.8 km of a train station, so easy to walk to them. We used a taxi one time, only b/c hubby was not feeling well.
We liked the ability to get off the train at a stop, put packs in a locker and go explore. I guess you could do same with a 21" roller - we only needed one locker, maybe the rollers would need individual lockers (but hey, you're only talking 2E extra). We weren't sure before trying this that we would always be able to find a locker, so didn't want to be stuck with rolling luggage.
We were gone for 9 'hotel nights', though... you can do it too, but plan for doing laundry along the way. We dressed very casually and stayed in 2** or 3*** hotels, none of which would bat an eye at backpacks.
Having done that trip, a small rolling bag would have been fine as well. I'm reverting back to it for next trip b/c we aren't doing any side trips.
We liked the ability to get off the train at a stop, put packs in a locker and go explore. I guess you could do same with a 21" roller - we only needed one locker, maybe the rollers would need individual lockers (but hey, you're only talking 2E extra). We weren't sure before trying this that we would always be able to find a locker, so didn't want to be stuck with rolling luggage.
We were gone for 9 'hotel nights', though... you can do it too, but plan for doing laundry along the way. We dressed very casually and stayed in 2** or 3*** hotels, none of which would bat an eye at backpacks.
Having done that trip, a small rolling bag would have been fine as well. I'm reverting back to it for next trip b/c we aren't doing any side trips.
#7
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 98,229
Likes: 12
There's no one right answer to this question (in my opinion). I was never of the backpack persuasion, but used a medium duffle with shoulder strap many trips. Lately I find a 22" rolling suitcase more comfortable (back problems).
As far as safety with backpacks, just don't have valuables accessible thru a zipper pocket, while your bag is on your back (especially in crowded places like subway). Some people use locks or mesh cages (but this seems a bit much to me).
As far as safety with backpacks, just don't have valuables accessible thru a zipper pocket, while your bag is on your back (especially in crowded places like subway). Some people use locks or mesh cages (but this seems a bit much to me).
Trending Topics
#10
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
We've always carried backpacks as opposed to suitcases on our trips to Europe. I like not having to wait for luggage only to find it hasn't arrived. We also take small foldable bags and then fill them up with our dirty clothes and check them on the trip home. This way we have our backpacks with us full of the things we have purchased. We're heading back in March with our 2 children, 10 and 12, and they too our carrying backpacks. We've never had to do laundry in the past but maybe this time with the kids. Socks and underwear can be washed in the hotel sink. Have fun!
#11
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
We're 60-something and we always use backpacks. I have no idea why a hotel would care what kind of luggage you carried. They are compact and convenient and you don't waste space with a wheelwell.
I have seen people wearing them backwards (small ones) to thwart pickpockets, but we've had no troubles. I do lock my main compartment with passport, money, etc.
Take them and enjoy your trip.
I have seen people wearing them backwards (small ones) to thwart pickpockets, but we've had no troubles. I do lock my main compartment with passport, money, etc.
Take them and enjoy your trip.



