Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Amsterdam for 4 days?

Search

Amsterdam for 4 days?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13th, 2006 | 11:46 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Amsterdam for 4 days?

My friends and I are taking a European vacation and one of our stops is Amsterdam. They want to spend 3 nights and 4 full days there. From what I've been reading there isn't a whole lot to see or do?? Maybe I'm wrong. I would rather spend 3 days there and add an extra day to Rome for 5 days in rome. What is everyone's opinion on spending 4 days in Amsterdam too long or just right? Thanks
sweetpea15 is offline  
Old Feb 13th, 2006 | 11:50 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
I could easily spend a week in Amsterdam. However, since I don't know what you're giving up to do it, it's hard to say. I think 3 days in Ams. to get 5 in Rome is a decent trade off (as long as you're not going in August).
Catbert is offline  
Old Feb 13th, 2006 | 11:53 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Do you intend to visit some museums in Amsterdam? If yes, and I recommend to do this, 4 days will be OK.

On the other hand, if you comapre what you have to visit in Amsterdam and in Rome, there are more, more things to see in Rome. How nmaany day you plan for it - 4 or 5?
We stayed one week, and I would like to have 2 more days.
valtor is offline  
Old Feb 13th, 2006 | 11:53 AM
  #4  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,619
Likes: 0
You COULD rush thru Amsterdam checking off the must sees in three days but IMO it is a city that should be savored. Lots of great neighborhoods to stroll thru, cafes on the side of canals to sit and watch the boats and bicycles, charming shops to browse in, some nice daytrips to nearby locations, plus all the major sites....I would love to have a week or more to spend in Amsterdam. But to some extend it depends on your travel style and interests but I don't think you will regret (or be bored)if you spend 4 days there.
suec1 is offline  
Old Feb 13th, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #5  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,829
Likes: 0
You can easily keep busy for 4 days. We were there for 3.5 days and still didn't see many of the things I would have liked to. On the other hand, I could spend 2 weeks in Rome and not get bored.
MFNYC is offline  
Old Feb 13th, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,641
Likes: 0
there's much more to see and do in Rome and Rome is a much larger city. Amsterdam is compact and if not into museums there's little to see except the canal-laced city itself - one of Europe's most very beautiful cities but three days should be enough. Now if into coffeeshops and their legal sales of cannabis and 'magic' mushrooms you may need more time!
PalQ is offline  
Old Feb 13th, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,260
Likes: 0
Give the fact that after reading about the city you don't feel there is a lot to see and do I suspect three days would be plenty.
Intrepid1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Princess
Europe
7
Apr 8th, 2009 08:32 PM
johnz323
Europe
12
Apr 3rd, 2007 11:27 AM
alc1974
Europe
14
Mar 9th, 2007 12:19 PM
Globetrotta
Europe
5
Sep 22nd, 2006 09:55 AM
krowden
Europe
10
Dec 8th, 2004 05:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -