Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Sardy House in Aspen

Search

Sardy House in Aspen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8th, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #1  
SHL
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Sardy House in Aspen

Originally booked to stay at St. Regis but decided to switch to Sardy House. I want something more intimate. In addition, St. Regis is sitll undergoing some renovation. Can some one please command on Sardy House?
SHL is offline  
Old Sep 8th, 2004 | 04:24 PM
  #2  
SHL
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
I meant "comment" in my original post!
SHL is offline  
Old Sep 9th, 2004 | 07:43 AM
  #3  
MaureenB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We have not stayed at the Sardy House, but we've eaten in its restaurant. It's a beautiful old Victorian in downtown Aspen. Judging from the well-kept lobby and the nice restaurant, I'd guess the hotel is just as nice. The Hotel Jerome next door is even better, but it's probably much more expensive. You'll love Aspen.
 
Old Sep 9th, 2004 | 01:38 PM
  #4  
SHL
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Thanks for your input. How about Sardy House vs. Little Nell? I know it probably is a no brainer for most of you (Little Nell of course!), but for some reason (based on the pictures from its website), I don't find it especially unique and attractive. I know Little Nell is known for its outstanding service, and I am a big fan of that. We've always preferred the Four Seasons. My impression of the Sardy House is that it provides very good services as well and it is a bit more unique and secluded. Any comment?
SHL is offline  
Old Sep 9th, 2004 | 05:05 PM
  #5  
MaureenB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It depends on what you want. Little Nell is more 'Hollywood' -- it's newer, and glitzy. You'll see lots of Hummers, and other very high end vehicles. Its lobby is very upscale, classy-- so are its tenants. On the other hand, Little Nell could be a five-star hotel anywhere. The Sardy House is more 'Aspen,' in my opinion. My own personal preference is to stay in places that have a local flair, which would be the Sardy in this case. Or, like I said, the Hotel Jerome is our favorite. It's an historic landmark, excellent service, good restaurants. Actually, you can't go wrong. Just a matter of personal taste.
 
Old Sep 10th, 2004 | 08:02 AM
  #6  
MaureenB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
P.S. You mentioned "secluded", but none of the three hotels we've discussed are secluded. They are all in 'downtown' Aspen.
 
Old Oct 6th, 2004 | 05:40 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 0
I think she said "intimate" rather than "secluded" and I would call the Sardy House intimate based on size. I ate there years ago and wasn't impressed, kind of found it shabby in comparison to the restaurant at Little Nell but that was some time ago so hard to compare. I know the Sardy House has changed to a fractional ownership arrangement so things may be totally different these days.

I have nosed around the Little Nell and the St. Regis on many occassions and would love to stay at either hotel. Although large they come across as very low key and cozy.

I think the Hotel Jerome would be a step between the small intimate Sardy House and the two larger hotels. I have a friend who stayed there early winter last year and was really impressed with the level of service she received.
amwosu is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emcash
United States
28
Oct 9th, 2011 05:01 PM
poss
United States
6
Jan 15th, 2008 09:27 AM
bugswife1
United States
8
Feb 10th, 2007 07:49 AM
GailLK
Australia & the Pacific
18
Jul 7th, 2004 08:37 AM
JamilaZ
Europe
7
Feb 19th, 2003 12:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -