Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Oregon or Washington, that is the question

Search

Oregon or Washington, that is the question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17th, 2005, 06:03 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oregon or Washington, that is the question

Have been several times to Oregon coast and, several years ago,to Washington coast. Want to take a two to three week trip to the coast area of one of these states.

How do they compare in terms of places to stay, both camping and other accommodations, prices, and crowds? I would like to go in April/May or September/ October of 2006.

Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
GJLinda is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2005, 06:53 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best, most scenic part of the Washington coast (the northern half) is quite remote and has either a very few scattered accomodations (eg Kalaloch Lodge) or wilderness camping only (backpacking in Olympic National Park). I think the wilderness camping is fantastic but of course you have to be into that. The southern part of the Washington Coast (Ocean Shores, Long Beach) has more to offer for tourists but isn't nearly as scenic or interesting as the Oregon Coast. So, if you're looking for a great scenery plus a good variety of accomodations (car campgrounds, cottages, condos) and restaurants, town activities, etc, I'd suggest Oregon.
Of course, two to three weeks is enough time for both, unless you want to be in a single spot and relax the whole time.
christy1 is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2005, 09:00 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a resident of Washington who enjoys both the Oregon and Washington Coasts, I think christy1 is quite correct in her observations. The Oregon Coast does offer far more opportunities for camping and general accommodations.

Pricing would be similar, I believe, as would crowds at the two times of year you are considering. Weather might be better in Sept/Oct than April/May, the latter being perhaps more foggy and cool. But...in the Northwest, one can never tell or predict!

Check out websites for the two states regarding tourism, camping and
travel. Good luck!
suelh is offline  
Old Sep 18th, 2005, 08:29 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 97,172
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
While I love my state of Washington I think the Oregon coast is more beautiful and easily accessible. Loads of great set-ups for camping, staying in yurts, state parks, condos on the ocean, etc. I'd aim for either May or September since April or October more likely would be cooler and possibly raining.
suze is online now  
Old Sep 18th, 2005, 08:43 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too agree with the others. While the Washington coast is gorgeous, much of it is very difficult to get to and with little to no accomodation.

Oregon coast is a very beautiful too but with much easier access.

Ken
LordBalfor is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robinmich
United States
15
Jun 19th, 2009 08:31 AM
BJinHolland
United States
3
Jan 17th, 2007 01:09 PM
CatWoman
United States
11
Nov 6th, 2005 05:56 PM
Allysum
United States
6
Sep 27th, 2003 08:15 AM
MrAmerica
United States
17
Apr 19th, 2003 02:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -