Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

help with a location to move to

Search

help with a location to move to

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
help with a location to move to

I need some help please. My husband and I want to start looking to buy land now for our retirement years which is about 12 years away. We would like 60 to 100 acres with mountains, mature woods and within 60 minutes or so of a major ski resort. We thought Tahoe area, western Montana, northern Utah, maybe Colorado. We do not want desert conditions at all. We are also considering State Income and Sales tax rates. We also don't want it to be so rural that it's an hours drive to a store. I would like to be able to get to a decent grocery store or a department store such as Target within 30 minutes or so. And lastly, we would like to keep it in the $200,000 price range.
I would appreciate some recommendations for towns/areas where I can start looking for property that would meet these qualifications. I don't mind if I have to wait a year or more to find the actual parcel that we want and would actualy prefer to wait until I find the exact property we want.
It's such a big canvas to choose from that I thought some personal experiences could help narrow it down.
Thank you for all the help!
milkeway4 is offline  
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 12:30 PM
  #2  
GoTravel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wow! I'd also love to know if 60-100 acres within an hour of a major ski resort for $200,000 is available. I'm not kidding.

Sounds like paradise.
 
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 12:50 PM
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
It does sound like paradise and it's got to be possible somewhere!!!!!!!!!
I'll keep my fingers crossed!!
milkeway4 is offline  
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 01:07 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
If only you had posted 30 years ago... 1/2 acre lots in our town (about 60 minutes to skiing) sell for 400K - when available (rarely).
julie_Colorado is offline  
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 02:37 PM
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
but Julie, you've got to be quite suburban, true? Half an acre lot at $400,000 is certainly the upper end. I'm considering buying a wooded lot in NY (upstate, way upstate) right now for $80,000 for 18 acres with a stream and a 15 minute drive to a major city! It's adjacent to my current property and I don't want anyone to build on it.
It's hard to believe that there isn't somewhere that you can drive for an hour after you leave a ski resort and end up in a rural area where you can find land in this price range. Maybe I'm wrong. But I'm certainly going to give it a try.
milkeway4 is offline  
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 03:54 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,886
Likes: 0
Exactly what major city in New York can you get 18 acres near for $80,000.? (And is it near anywhere you can get a ob?)

In the suburbs here you can get 50 X 100 for about $225,000 - empty - house extra.
nytraveler is offline  
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
I have no idea what land costs, but if you go farther away from Big Mountain (not Big Sky) in Montana you might find it. I read a book about a man who moved to the Yaak area of Montana - way up near the Canada line. But it's remote up here and very rural - not what you're asking. They don't even have electricity.

I doubt you would find this in Colorado.
karens is offline  
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
colorado actually is not my first choice. I really was thinking somewhere in Nevada maybe, Northern utah, western montana, northern idaho maybe. Colorado would do. At a minimum I would want 50 acres. Karen, why do you say Big mountain not big sky becuase I was thinking within an hour of big sky.
Thanks for help too!
milkeway4 is offline  
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,586
Likes: 0
Big Mountain is up near Kalispell. Big Sky is near Bozeman and Livingston is not that far away, either. I eliminated Big Sky just knowing that Bozeman and Livingston have attracted a lot of super wealthy people building huge vacation homes. Their presence doesn't seem to indicate the type of affordability that you're looking for. I may be way off base with my assumptions, but that's why I said what I did.
karens is offline  
Old Sep 2nd, 2005 | 06:51 PM
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
that makes sense Karen, thank you!
milkeway4 is offline  
Old Sep 3rd, 2005 | 12:51 AM
  #11  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Bright,Victoria,Australia.
johhj_au is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
koala
United States
11
Jan 10th, 2007 12:40 PM
palmettoprincess
United States
5
Dec 25th, 2006 07:43 PM
JennieH
Canada
5
Jan 23rd, 2006 01:07 AM
travelphile
United States
5
Nov 13th, 2004 12:35 PM
lrjones
United States
9
Jan 27th, 2004 03:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -