Virgin Atlantic is a nightmare
#21
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 34,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think it needs to be pulled, it has some info for folks flying Virgin Atlantic.
I usually fly Air France to Europe and have never had any issue getting an assigned seat when I book the flight, rather than 24 hrs in advance. IN fact, I'm looking at buying a ticket from them now and they allow me to select my seat, and it's a couple months in advance.
I usually fly Air France to Europe and have never had any issue getting an assigned seat when I book the flight, rather than 24 hrs in advance. IN fact, I'm looking at buying a ticket from them now and they allow me to select my seat, and it's a couple months in advance.
#22
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have found most airlines allow seat selection if they have lots of seats available when I book. However, if the flight is close to selling out or if I am booking close to my date of departure, I usually have to wait until 24 hours before flying to choose my seat.
#23
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some posts might provide good information, but the headline is what everyone will see, "Virgin Atlantic is a nightmare". Many might read that, and move on, discounting Virgin based on just skimming headlines.
As the OP, I would either delete the thread, or re-post the good information under a revised headline, "I was wrong about Virgin Atlantic being a nightmare". Just in all fairness to readers and to Virgin. IMHO.
As the OP, I would either delete the thread, or re-post the good information under a revised headline, "I was wrong about Virgin Atlantic being a nightmare". Just in all fairness to readers and to Virgin. IMHO.
#24
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone who would judge an airline solely by the title of a thread on a website is an idiot. This thread contains useful info and shouldn't be deleted.
As far as it being in fairness to "readers," if they actually read the thread they will see that it is indeed fair to Virgin. As for Virgin, I think Richard Branson and his billions will be able to survive one misleading title on a Fodor's forum. IMHO.
As far as it being in fairness to "readers," if they actually read the thread they will see that it is indeed fair to Virgin. As for Virgin, I think Richard Branson and his billions will be able to survive one misleading title on a Fodor's forum. IMHO.
#25
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm, quite an interesting reaction to my suggestion.
Because Branson is wealthy and successful, it is ok to trash his business unfairly?
And because headline-readers are "idiots", there is no need to be respectful by clearing up a misstatement.
Well, it isn't my thread, and I won't post again about it, but if it were mine, I would re-post and clear it up. I think we owe each other to be correct and not inflammatory in our postings.
Because Branson is wealthy and successful, it is ok to trash his business unfairly?
And because headline-readers are "idiots", there is no need to be respectful by clearing up a misstatement.
Well, it isn't my thread, and I won't post again about it, but if it were mine, I would re-post and clear it up. I think we owe each other to be correct and not inflammatory in our postings.
#26
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The OP didn't trash his business--she expressed her opinion. Several posters came to Virgin's defense. The OP then acknowledged that she didn't realize this was common practice in the airline business. There's nothing else to clear up.
I won't post again either. We've beat this horse this enough.
I won't post again either. We've beat this horse this enough.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usernameistaken
Air Travel
20
Mar 9th, 2010 10:53 AM
EllensWords
Air Travel
7
Jun 5th, 2006 04:02 PM