Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

UK and per room vs. per person room rates

Search

UK and per room vs. per person room rates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27th, 2006 | 01:47 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
UK and per room vs. per person room rates

traveling to UK next summer: Cambridge Duxford area and flight to Edinburgh and Celtic Festival on Isle of Lewis. Have seen rooms set at a per room rate and others per person. With the lousy exchange rate, the per-person route is pretty steep. Is there a trend toward a per-room rate vs. a per-person rate and having to make their room rates more exchange-rate friendly? Or is this just wishful thinking/hallucinations on my part? Boy the dollar is pretty lame against most currencies...even Canada is catching up!
nimbus109 is offline  
Old Dec 27th, 2006 | 02:20 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,666
Likes: 0
i don't understand your question about 'exchange rate friendly'. some hotels/b&bs charge by the room and some per person. i do not notice any trends one way or the other. the total turns out more or less the same anyway. the vast majority of decent (but not top) b&bs are priced at £60-70 per room, per night. the same type of place would be quoted as £35 ppn (per person, per night). special events and seaside rooms in the summer are exceptions to this.

i have not noticed any different pricing due to the decline of the US dollar, but since i'm in the UK, i would not be aware of any special offers aimed at americans. anyway, average local businesses would not change their pricing for this reason. only businesses aimed at americans (eg american focused tour companies) would even consider doing this.
walkinaround is offline  
Old Dec 27th, 2006 | 02:23 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 0
Can't imagine that they'd be making room rates more exchange rate friendly, after all they have to pay UK bills not US or CDN ones.

I wonder if by summer you mean August which for Edinburgh means paying through the nose?

Can you give some examples?
alanRow is offline  
Old Dec 27th, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Rate per room is a fairly new concept in the UK, at least as far as the advertised prices were concerned. Rate per person was much more common, though in the small print there was usually a hefty "single occupancy supplement" which meant a room for one was nearly as much as a room for two.
In the last ten years or so there's been a big increase in no-frills hotels aimed at people (and families) who want a bed for the night and not much more. These often charge for a room with a big bed for mum and dad and smaller beds for one or two children, all in the same room. I don't know if it's the impact of these places, or if the UK is moving to a more European way of doing things, but I've noticed that more hotels and B&Bs are quoting a rate per room now. I don't think there's any firm rule about which is better value, it partly depends on how many of your fellow travellers you want to share a room with.
Craigellachie is offline  
Old Dec 28th, 2006 | 09:33 AM
  #5  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 35,154
Likes: 0
How can it be an unusual concept for the UK to price rates per room, rather than per person. That's the only thing that makes a lot of sense. Advertising for deals may quote per person because it makes it look cheaper. I have been traveling to the UK for about 15-20 years and have always been quoted rates per room in hotels, not per person. B&Bs may do something different, but it isn't a foreign concept to British hotels that you are actually paying for a room, it's not a rooming house or hostel or something.
Christina is offline  
Old Dec 28th, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
I've been going to and traveling within the UK at least annually for about 18 years now. I can't recall EVER being quoted a price for a hotel per person. It has always been per room. But then I've never stayed in a B&B if that's what you are referring to.
NeoPatrick is offline  
Old Jan 6th, 2007 | 08:07 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,159
Likes: 0
Craigellachie is one hundred per cent correct. It may that this stuff is marketed differntly into the States or in US based chains; but it is certainly true that a room rate is becoming more common.
sheila is offline  
Old Jan 6th, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #8  
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 75,037
Likes: 50
MANY hotels and B&Bs are pp. I'm pretty amazed NeoPatrick has never experienced that w/ all the times you've been there. Now in big city hotels - it is most often per room.

But in smaller places it is pretty much 50/50 - some per room, some per person double occupancy.
janisj is offline  
Old Jan 6th, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
As others have noted, it is the smaller properties (family owned, out of the way types) that will charge per person. However, whether it is per person or per room is irrelevant as it's the total amount that is important.
m_kingdom2 is offline  
Old Jan 6th, 2007 | 08:55 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
As I said, I've never stayed in B&B's. I guess I have seen per person rates when a place is half pension -- or including meals at all, but I avoid that like the plague, so again I haven't run into it.
NeoPatrick is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
afterall
United States
31
Dec 31st, 2008 06:08 PM
klim
Europe
11
Jun 14th, 2007 04:36 AM
annie4
Europe
6
Mar 22nd, 2006 02:23 PM
trueguy
Europe
5
May 6th, 2004 12:44 PM
hester
United States
7
Aug 2nd, 2002 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -