Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Ryanair Boeing 737 seat question

Ryanair Boeing 737 seat question

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 06:06 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 1
Ryanair Boeing 737 seat question

While returning from Sicily last week, there was an altercation between several passengers trying to get the two window seats on the last row of a Ryanair 737.

As they were among the first passengers on the plane, I was surprised they hadn't gone for the over wing seats near the exits - what is so special about the seats they wanted ?
willit is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 06:13 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Don't let everybody know that there is more room in the seats near the wing!!!! Every buggar will be attempting to get there before me now....aghhhhhh

Regarding the window seats at the back, I don't know. I don't like those seats as it always seems bumpier there.
jeep_potter is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 06:43 AM
  #3  
ira
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Hi W,

It could be that they had heard that in case of a crash the tail of the plane is safer than the front.

ira is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 07:12 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,188
Likes: 0
Did this plane allow you to board and disembark from both the back and the front? If so, sitting in the back row is very desirable.
WillTravel is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #5  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,359
Likes: 0
You might want to post your question in the Airline forum as well as here.
Underhill is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #6  
CU
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
I have heard of this on other airlines and I have been informed that some passangers feel hemmed in when the refreshment trolleys are on the aisles so they look for a back seat or else one at the front.
CU is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 02:46 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,232
Likes: 0
Whwn we were on Ryanair they let you go out either the front door or the back door. They probably just wanted to get off quick.
wliwl is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
They probably had air rage induced by making the effort to get to check-in over two hours early, only to watch latecomers with high-numbered passes being allowed to board in the 'only passengers with numbers 1 - 61' phase.
papagena is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 03:41 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,492
Likes: 0
isn't the boarding chaos amazing?
why don't they just give out seat assignments? does that really save them money???

i guess it saves time, more than money, by not having to ask everyone what type of seat they want. but it reminds me of the iberia boarding chaos thirty years ago.

i was soooo glad when they FINALLY started assigning seats!!!!
lincasanova is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #10  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,232
Likes: 0
I liked the no seat assignments. It was super quick loading that plane! Our flight was only about 2 hours (maybe less). Who cares WHERE you sit for 2 hours?

I just want to get off a plane as fast as possible - so sitting there while everyone takes forever stashing all their junk drives me crazy.
wliwl is offline  
Old Oct 26th, 2005 | 11:45 PM
  #11  
Original Poster
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 1
"only to watch latecomers with high-numbered passes being allowed to board in the 'only passengers with numbers 1 - 61' phase. "

During boarding at Stansted at the beginning of October, Ryanair were very strict about this. Several people were turned away from the gate because of "high numbers". I was quite glad to see this. On the return flight, it seemed to be a bit of a "Free for all".

There was also a slight problem with groups of people boarding late, then wanting to sit together, so trying to "negotiate" other people out of the seats they wanted. Twice the stewardess had to insist that people take the nearest available seat, or the flight would be delayed.
willit is offline  
Old Oct 27th, 2005 | 12:41 AM
  #12  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,492
Likes: 0
i find the "no seats" very stressful for families or travel mates that want to be together, have fear of flying..or think they need to be near a certain person,place.

but i do see that it must be a time/money saver or they wouldn't do it.
lincasanova is offline  
Old Oct 27th, 2005 | 01:36 AM
  #13  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
I think that as long as they strictly apply the 'seats 1-65' rule strictly, it's quite a fair system. It encourages people to come to the airport early, so queues at check-in are better spread out. People that absolutely want to sit together or have a special seat, just have to make sure that they come to the airport well in time.

And yes, as for the back seats, I think it's about unloading the plane from both front and back.
stardust is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bloom
Air Travel
21
Aug 17th, 2007 01:46 PM
vinylcrocodile
Europe
8
Jan 5th, 2007 02:14 AM
simpsonc510
Air Travel
11
May 11th, 2006 02:44 PM
Carole
Europe
17
Oct 8th, 2005 04:35 PM
LostinChina
Asia
7
Mar 9th, 2005 08:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -