Oh, the humanity! Métro Ligne 1
#23
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
It is called "La Defense" because it is where the defense of Paris was set in 1870 during the war against Prussia. Before the 1950s and the beginning of the construction, there was a simple crossroad here (East to Paris and 2 other roads NW & SW to the suburban areas). A statue of the "National Defense" was erected there. You can still see it close to the fountain and the Calder and Miro sculptures.
#25

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 24,034
Likes: 6
No more automobile museum at La Défense.
While the Imax dome and the auto building were not officially connected, UGC connected everything into an 16 screen megaplex. The Imax function was not even retained and the inside of the dome is just part of the grandiose entrance hall.
While the Imax dome and the auto building were not officially connected, UGC connected everything into an 16 screen megaplex. The Imax function was not even retained and the inside of the dome is just part of the grandiose entrance hall.
#28
Original Poster
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Everybody should! It's only 10 minutes from Châtelet-les Halles on RER A.
BTW - budget travelers should consider staying at La Défense, because lodging values* are much better there. Since you're probably going to ride to most of the things you go to Paris to see, 10 minutes more in a train isn't that much in the grand scheme of things - and Montmartre and the Arc/Champs are even closer than many neighborhoods.
You can even go back to the hotel for a siesta without losing much time.
* Value = more room than in the city center for the same money, or the same room for less money.
BTW - budget travelers should consider staying at La Défense, because lodging values* are much better there. Since you're probably going to ride to most of the things you go to Paris to see, 10 minutes more in a train isn't that much in the grand scheme of things - and Montmartre and the Arc/Champs are even closer than many neighborhoods.
You can even go back to the hotel for a siesta without losing much time.
* Value = more room than in the city center for the same money, or the same room for less money.
#29
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 0
http://www.parisladefense.com/parisladefense/plan.htm
You'll be able to find a map and list of the artistic works on the esplanade...
You'll be able to find a map and list of the artistic works on the esplanade...
#32
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
I lived in Paris and never went to La Defense. A friend of mine in London took me to Canary Wharf for the express purpose of showing me how awful it is -- and I concurred.
What difference does it make if you go to Paris a lot and don't go to La Defense? I mean, I wouldn't avoid it, but why go? Until the WTC was incinerated, most tourists never went to the Financial District of NY, except a few to gawk at Wall Street. And why should they have done?
What surprises me is how many visitors to Paris who go with a checklist of art museums and churches and historical sites never go to St Denis.
What difference does it make if you go to Paris a lot and don't go to La Defense? I mean, I wouldn't avoid it, but why go? Until the WTC was incinerated, most tourists never went to the Financial District of NY, except a few to gawk at Wall Street. And why should they have done?
What surprises me is how many visitors to Paris who go with a checklist of art museums and churches and historical sites never go to St Denis.
#34
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
Who said anything about "saving up their money to visit"?
zeppole, I'm a little confused by your post and that very odd choice of comparison. Before 9/11 TONS of tourists went to that area -- particularly to go to the top of the World Trade Center which was one of the busiest tourist attractions in the city. Tourists stood in line to do it day and night -- and the restaurant at the top was once the "busiest restaurant" in the entire US -- primarily with tourists. There also was a TKTS booth in the WTC -- very busy with tourists. Why did they go? Because it was an architectural wonder and offered an amazing view. While La Defense may be a little further removed from the center of Paris, that arch too is an architectural wonder and offers amazing views of Paris.
I'm still not saying the La Defense is the "be all" of Paris, but I think for those exploring all parts of Paris it is certainly worth a look, if for no other reason than to visit that arch and see the view. But I too would add St. Denis to that "why don't regular tourists visit. . ." list.
zeppole, I'm a little confused by your post and that very odd choice of comparison. Before 9/11 TONS of tourists went to that area -- particularly to go to the top of the World Trade Center which was one of the busiest tourist attractions in the city. Tourists stood in line to do it day and night -- and the restaurant at the top was once the "busiest restaurant" in the entire US -- primarily with tourists. There also was a TKTS booth in the WTC -- very busy with tourists. Why did they go? Because it was an architectural wonder and offered an amazing view. While La Defense may be a little further removed from the center of Paris, that arch too is an architectural wonder and offers amazing views of Paris.
I'm still not saying the La Defense is the "be all" of Paris, but I think for those exploring all parts of Paris it is certainly worth a look, if for no other reason than to visit that arch and see the view. But I too would add St. Denis to that "why don't regular tourists visit. . ." list.



