Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

London: Earthquakes, Tornadoes - Armaggedon?

Search

London: Earthquakes, Tornadoes - Armaggedon?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30th, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
London: Earthquakes, Tornadoes - Armaggedon?

I guess there was a significant earthquake in Kent, actually striking near the Chunnel (!) entrance and reverberating throughout SE England, including parts of London. Chimneys apparently were knocked down, plaster cracked, but no major destruction or injuries.

In any case would not have wanted to be in the Chunnel and felt the shocks there!

After a tornado recently (apparently London area is in a Tornady Alley and they are not all uncommon, i ask

Is this Armaggedon for London?
PalenQ is offline  
Old Apr 30th, 2007 | 07:59 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,549
Likes: 0
Pal, PLEAZZZZZZZZZZZZE....now I <b>KNOW</b> you've got too much time on your hands !!!
Dukey is offline  
Old Apr 30th, 2007 | 08:07 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Nah,

The meeja have got too many pages and too many channels.

Back when black and white telly was on ration, they wouldn't have given this kind of non-event houseroom.
flanneruk is offline  
Old Apr 30th, 2007 | 08:35 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
It was an earth tremor.
Tornadoes are quite common in the UK
It's the bloody Channel Tunnel, not the Chunnel!
Josser is offline  
Old Apr 30th, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #5  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,269
Likes: 0
Tornado Alley? Hardly. There was one localised whirlwind that caused a bit of damage in a couple of streets a few months ago. There was one in Birmingham a few years ago.

We don't do Armageddon. Not cricket, you know.
PatrickLondon is offline  
Old Apr 30th, 2007 | 10:04 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,886
Likes: 0
A whirlwind is hardly the same as a tornado. (Flying dust and trash versus flying buildings and cars.)

As for an earthquake - almost every place on earth has them. As long as major things aren;'t being knocked down - or you're not sitting on top of the San Andreas fault - this is a total non-issue.
nytraveler is offline  
Old Apr 30th, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78,320
Likes: 0
DOO-KEY:

Yes too much time since i no longer than better things to post than someone peeing behind a Burger King on the A-11 so need to post something - the jones you know.

If fact now to think about it i'm not sure the two are not related - the peeing incident and ensuing earthquake!
PalenQ is offline  
Old May 1st, 2007 | 01:27 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 0
I live in KEnt and I didn't know anything about the earthquake until I saw it on the news, so I don't think it was quite 'reverberating throughout SE England' as dramatically as that sounds.
nona1 is offline  
Old May 1st, 2007 | 03:16 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 0
Per square mile, the UK has more tornadoes than any other country in the world
alanRow is offline  
Old May 1st, 2007 | 03:54 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,641
Likes: 0
Alan, that's a fairly meaningless stat. Even the Met admits that UK tornadoes are, for the most part, much weaker and shorter lived than tornadoes in the U.S. According to the UK's meteorological services, &quot;The most powerful tornadoes occur in the USA and can cause a broad swathe of total destruction along their path.&quot;

People living in America's &quot;tornado alley&quot; would be very happy to exchange their tornadoes for the UK's.
BTilke is offline  
Old May 1st, 2007 | 07:11 AM
  #11  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,269
Likes: 0
I was watching one of those shock horror TV shows about tornadoes last night - some loon who does tours to them in the middle of a dozen ripping through South Dakota. Absolutely terrifying and HUGE clouds: we never get that.

You say tornado, we say &quot;Bit breezy today, isn't it?&quot;
PatrickLondon is offline  
Old May 1st, 2007 | 07:31 AM
  #12  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,106
Likes: 4
PalenQ,

Not a significant earthquake.Without going to check, I think it was about 4.5. This is small. The reason all those thing collapsed is that earthquakes in this part of the world are rare and many of the buildings are very old. Who knows if current building codes include anything about earthquakes?

One very interesting item; I read a comment from an insurance company representative who was asked if the damage would be covered by insurance. He replied that of course it would be. Isn't this exactly what insurance is for? I don't think US insurance companies think this way, but I sure wish they did.

Josser, it was an earthquake.
Barbara is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GodsGift
Europe
163
Jul 9th, 2007 04:45 AM
Patrick
Europe
25
Oct 28th, 2004 06:51 PM
2fly
Europe
6
May 11th, 2004 11:07 AM
stragic
Europe
33
Feb 20th, 2003 08:31 AM
SenoraSolidad
Europe
11
Nov 25th, 2002 10:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -