Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Is a 9 sq metre room very small?

Search

Is a 9 sq metre room very small?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 02:42 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Is a 9 sq metre room very small?

My recent post had me deciding on a couple of 2/3 star hotels, but I seem to have settled on Delavigne with 1 reservation. They told me honestly(the others say they dont know the room size!) that the double is approx 9 sq metres. We are a group of 5 women staying for 7 nights, the early bird price is very good, but is 9 sq metres pretty standard compared to other 2/3 star? (it is the minimum size for 3 star rating)We will be single occupancy of double room, so that helps. If you have stayed in the standard double at Delavigne, please let me know what you thought? Do you think rooms at Grandes Ecoles are much bigger?
comedian is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 02:51 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
That's about ten foot square, give or take a foot in either direction.

If you're not going to be spending much time in your room, and literally need "somewhere to sleep" and the price is perfect for you, then take it.
m_kingdom2 is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 02:52 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,549
Likes: 0
9 Sq meters = approximately 97 square feet.
Dukey is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 02:54 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,549
Likes: 0
MK has it right I would agree but remember that one spends fully one third of their travel day in their room even if it is only for sleeping.
Dukey is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 02:54 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
In imperial measure, it's a about 96 square feet. I would consider it quite small for a double (except in Paris or London budget hotels) but adequate for a single.
Padraig is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 03:51 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,549
Likes: 0
Frankly, I consider it "small" for Paris but then again I may be used to more expensive hotels, too.
Dukey is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 04:10 AM
  #7  
ira
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Hi C,

That's a small room.

However, if it will be only one person, it could be adequate.

ira is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 05:06 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
9 sq.metres. That't 3 x 3 meters right? That's too small for a double. Perhaps bearable if for 1 person but I rather agree with Dukey, even for Paris. I hope the ensuite bathroom is not in this 9 sq.meters.
kappa is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 05:22 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
The photos on the hotel's web site show the rooms not that small.

Did you take a look at Tripadvisor.com's review? A bit mixed but sounds like a ok place. Most say the rooms are small but not ridiculoulsy.

http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserR...de_France.html
kappa is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 05:24 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 0
Hotel websites typically show only the best rooms, renovated over non-renovated, larger over smaller, etc. So don't fully count on 'your' room looking just like a website photo.
Travelnut is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 05:30 AM
  #11  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
> Hotel websites typically show only the best rooms ...

Yes, that's right. My point is I can hardly imagine 9 sq.meter is the average size for double rooms at a 3 star hotel. That's really small. If it's the smallest room of the hotel, I could understand.
kappa is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 07:49 AM
  #12  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,019
Likes: 0
Let me suggest that you measure off an area in your house or apartment 10 x 10 feet. Then move a chest of drawers, smallest one you have, a night table, and a bed into that area. Mark off the area with masking tape or string, and stick to those dimensions for two nights. No cheating by using your closet for storage because most 2 star Paris hotel rooms don't have one. Any cabinets, armoires, tables, and chairs use up some of the available space.

That will give you an idea of what you will be tolerating.

I have had some very small hotel rooms and I felt like I was in a jail cell.
The old argument that "you are only sleeping" is a little hollow. I spend much more time in my room than that, particularly if it is raining outside.

bob_brown is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 08:38 AM
  #13  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
I will never ever say that I use a hotel room "just to sleep" in, as I will spend quite a good proportion of my time in there, however, for this poster seeking a 2 star property, a place to rest might literally be their idea of a bedroom.
m_kingdom2 is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #14  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 0
My main bedroom with 5' wide bed & triple wardrobe is 12 square metres - there's not a lot of room for anything else.

9 sqaure meters will get you a small double bed & a hanging rail and if you need to get from one side of the room to the other the easiest way will be across the bed.
alanRow is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 09:05 AM
  #15  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
"That's about ten foot square, give or take a foot in either direction".

MK you never ever fail to make me laugh !! Bravo !!

Muck
Mucky is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 09:06 AM
  #16  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
To clarify that's a square of side ten feet i.e. 100 square feet.
m_kingdom2 is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #17  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Google <b>9 sq m in sq ft</b> and all will be revealed.
Robespierre is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #18  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 35,148
Likes: 0
aside from the math, I would say that it is not that uncommon for a 2* hotel for a single room, no. I don't stay in a place knowingly with rooms that small, but I don't think it's that unusual for a single room in a cheap hotel. I had a room in the Muguet that was that small or smaller, I am sure, and some other 2* hotels.

The requirements for a double room aren't really that much higher for the hotel's rating -- if they just want to meet the standards. I think it's only one SM higher but don't have them at my desk now (eg, I think the minimum for a double in a 3* hotel is only 10 m2, as compared to 9 m2 for the single).

If you are just asking if that is really small compared to the norm for a single room in 2/3 star hotels in Paris, probably not.
Christina is online now  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Hi everyone, its teh op here..I suppose I didn't word ti very well..as an Aussie, I know all about sq metres! i just thought &quot;man, thats small!but wondered whether lots of rooms are that small and you dont know..in this case they spelled it out and this is not a 2 star everyone, ita a 3 star. I dont want anything dated or tired or shabby and ZThe Delavigne does look OK (on the web site ha ha) Grandes ecoles is my other option, they wont reply to q's so did anyone stay there and has an opinion on size of rooms? Jeanne, I emailed Bonapart re avail etc..and whichever place I book I am going to put in nice french soaps and a little bunch flowers to 'lift' it a little1
comedian is offline  
Old Dec 17th, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #20  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 0
I haven't ever tried emailing with the Bonaparte. Their website is new this year and I have no idea how responsive they are. But they do respond same day to my faxes.
JeanneB is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -