Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

If the reply to message is not on the page does that mean the thread was stopped?

Search

If the reply to message is not on the page does that mean the thread was stopped?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 12:07 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the reply to message is not on the page does that mean the thread was stopped?

I was trying to thank the people that were not mean in their reply to my thread about the jewish jewelery and the reply to message section was missing. Does this mean Fodor's doesn't want any more on this thread?

I ask the questions I think about. I don't have anyone else to talk to about any of this. And no matter what some mean people say, I will always come back for the nice people.
PLMN is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 12:15 PM
  #2  
ira
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi P,

>Does this mean Fodor's doesn't want any more on this thread?


Yes. They have closed the thread, but not deleted it.
ira is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 12:46 PM
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As always ira, I thank you

PLMN is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 01:39 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know if this is the case here, but there have been times when I thought my posting hadn't gone through.
I learned to wait a moment, hit Refresh, and the thread appears updated.
elaine is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 01:54 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Elaine, I think PLMN is talking about at the end of the thread there isn't even a place to click for "post a reply". There is no way to add anything. Fodors has decided enough is enough.

Yesterday I started a thread about why another thread that seemed totally civil had been "ended". My questioning thread had gotten a number of responses and then poof, that whole thread was completely deleated. So this one will probably disappear too. I don't think the powers above like us discussing how they do things.
Patrick is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 02:02 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 97,186
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Sometimes that situation (when the thread has no place to reply at the bottom) later changes back & you can add to it again. This was the case yesterday on an Amsterdam topic for awhile. My impression is it is a way to stop the thread until Fodors has time to review it (but I am just guessing by the way I've seen it work before).
suze is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 02:08 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 34,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I have heard in the past, Fodors thinks there is some sort of information for people on the thread, but since it has degenerated in some way, they freeze it to stop it from getting worse.
So you can still cull the good info from the unwanted trashing of a thread.
Scarlett is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 07:36 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you supply the bat and ball you get to decide how to play the game.
USNR is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 07:42 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 34,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
USNR, LOL, True, true~
Scarlett is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 07:47 PM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
USNR, I agree totally. But when they stopped one thread that seemingly was totally about travel and had not had a single nasty slam, quoted material, or anything else that seemed to be against rules I was curious why. In addition to the post in which I asked why, which they deleted, I also emailed the editors and politely asked what it was about that thread that led to its demise. Guess what, they chose not to answer me directly, but deleted the thread discussing it.
Even the person supplying the bat and ball usually will explain what rule has been broken.
Patrick is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 07:49 PM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Patrick, what thread was it? (or are you afraid to say?)
FromAtlanta is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2004, 08:56 PM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Patrick, are you saying you emailed directly to [email protected] and received no reply whatsoever? That is surprising to me, as I have always gotten a reply although it may take a few days. I would write again. You are a valuable contributor to this forum, not a troll or a troublemaker, so I can't believe you would not get the courtesy of a reply.
Marilyn is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2004, 10:01 AM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 34,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really don't think Fodors has the time to personally answer every email they get about this board. It doesn't surprise me because I rarely get an answer from Fodors when I write them about this board. I haven't done it a lot, but I think they only responded once and that was several years ago when the board was younger.

In fact, I think that I don't even get an automated response any more saying they got my post -- not sure. Sometimes they have done what I asked (such as banning someone for advertising), although they never responded to me about it.
Christina is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2004, 10:20 AM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Marilyn. That is correct. I've emailed before and always gotten an answer, but not this time. It has only been two or three days, but I don't think it's ever taken that long before unless over a weekend.

Please don't laugh, but now I've forgotten what that "ended" post was. I was just surprised because it had a lot of responses and none were political or nasty and the thread really was very travel related. Can anyone help me out here, what the specific thread was? (God, I must be getting old.)
Patrick is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2004, 10:23 AM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Patrick, are you talking about the razor blade thread on the US board?
Jocelyn_P is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2004, 10:29 AM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Patrick,

They cut off the thread about the Olympics and totally deleted a follow-up thread.

JoeG
JoeG is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2004, 10:34 AM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you, yes, Jocelyn.
It was all about what kind of compensation should be expected from a hotel when something "dangerous" happens. It started with a story of someone stepping on a razor blade on the floor of their hotel room, under the bed skirt. There were a lot of posts, discussing various opinions about how much compensation should be expected from a hotel for various issues and if it should depend on whether injury actually occurred or just could have been possible.
In reviewing it after it was "ended" I really couldn't find a single thing that would be against the rules or policies of this board. Of course there were a couple of oddball posts like mentioning what the razor blade could have been used for, but nothing I would think would cause the thread to be controversial.
Patrick is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2004, 10:48 AM
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JoeG. They didn't delete the Olympics post but just ended it, as you say. If you go back and look at it, I'd have to agree that it had nothing to do with travel (except in the wildest stretch of imagination). The whole thread was started with a question about people being unimpressed with TV coverage of the Olympics and that's what it continued about -- not about traveling to the Olympics or hotel prices there, or anything else travel related. It ended up being a discussion of which network gives better coverage and a lot of comments about Katie Couric's dangling legs -- hardly travel fodder. I totally understand their reasoning in stopping that thread. I didn't see the follow up one that you say was deleted so I can't comment on that.
Patrick is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2004, 12:38 PM
  #19  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Around the same time they also completely deleted the thread "Getting Stoned in Amsterdam", which was totally related to travelling to Amsterdam. There was alot of excellent advice on what to look for and expect with your first coffeeshop experience, information that MANY American tourists could utilize.

Hmmmm....razor blades & cocaine...marijuana & hashish...I see a connection here. Peace. >-

Robyn
artstuff is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clarin
Europe
7
Oct 25th, 2007 11:49 AM
napamatt
Africa & the Middle East
69
May 31st, 2007 10:01 AM
DebitNM
United States
12
Sep 3rd, 2006 09:09 PM
cmt
Europe
14
Oct 3rd, 2005 04:51 PM
smacknmo
Europe
21
Feb 21st, 2005 05:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -