Dog Tags
#21
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
At the risk of making a statement that may be a painful reminder to those who lost loved ones at the WTC (and perhaps the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania, but in many tragic situations as well)...
...an implanted (RFID) chip will not always be a means of determining identity of a body in some cases, nor even necessarily useful for determining if a body was or was not present in some devastating explosions, fires, or air crash sites from which no recovery is possible.
And in the other 99% of the situations when I might be klled or rendered unconscious without anyone around who knows me, I think that my passport in my pocket will suffice for me.
Best wishes,
Rex
...an implanted (RFID) chip will not always be a means of determining identity of a body in some cases, nor even necessarily useful for determining if a body was or was not present in some devastating explosions, fires, or air crash sites from which no recovery is possible.
And in the other 99% of the situations when I might be klled or rendered unconscious without anyone around who knows me, I think that my passport in my pocket will suffice for me.
Best wishes,
Rex
#25
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Hi Intrepid1
>Ira, I cannot imagine you actually putting the words "Republican" and "Al Qaida" (please learn how to spell those terrorist names properly) in the same sentence...<
Even after seeing it?
It's not "Republican"?

>Ira, I cannot imagine you actually putting the words "Republican" and "Al Qaida" (please learn how to spell those terrorist names properly) in the same sentence...<
Even after seeing it?

It's not "Republican"?

#26
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Rex is "hooked on phonix"...and dare I say that one might throw a u in Quaida, but it still looks wrong.
Besides, "Qaida" is closer to how GWB pronounces it anyway.
Jules,
who's waiting for a chance for my retina to be scanned and any other technology that will help "Them" follow my every move.
Besides, "Qaida" is closer to how GWB pronounces it anyway.
Jules,
who's waiting for a chance for my retina to be scanned and any other technology that will help "Them" follow my every move.

#27

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 35,163
Likes: 0
I don't know what the original poster really meant, but will take him at the surface meaning -- dog tags as the military wears (not implant chips).
There is no point to this as it is no different than a passport. In fact, that's pretty much what it is, only a piece of metal hung around one's neck rather than a paper booklet. So how on earth can requiring US citizens to wear a piece of metal around their neck for travel be anything revolutionary in comparison to requiring them to carry their passport for international travel, which they are?
This whole propsition seems pointless to me.
There is no point to this as it is no different than a passport. In fact, that's pretty much what it is, only a piece of metal hung around one's neck rather than a paper booklet. So how on earth can requiring US citizens to wear a piece of metal around their neck for travel be anything revolutionary in comparison to requiring them to carry their passport for international travel, which they are?
This whole propsition seems pointless to me.
#31
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seetheworld
Europe
6
Dec 23rd, 2007 02:03 AM



