Copenhagen or Stockholm?

Oct 13th, 2015, 08:57 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,858
Copenhagen or Stockholm?

We are taking a Nat Geo trip in mid July to Norway ~ starts in Oslo, ends in Bergen.

We would like to add either Copenhagen or Stockholm, anyone have a favorite between these two? How do they compare with each other?

Thanks, I don't know much about either, we have never been to the Scandinavian countries.
wrenwood is offline  
Oct 13th, 2015, 09:42 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,745
Stockholm is best seen in the summer, it is spread out over many islands and you can take a trip into the archipelago. It really is a beautiful city and depending on your interests, there should be things to see eg the Vasa Museum, Gamla Stan, Skansen etc that might interest you.

Copenhagen is quite different, it is also by the sea and has fortifications, castles, parks, has the Tivoli Gardens which is an old fashioned theme park. The food scene is better in Copenhagen IMO with some world class cooking (and prices to match in some but not all cases), it also has an old town, easy to do daytrips to see Hamlet's Castle and Roskilde. Like Stockholm, it has royal palaces. It depends on your interests which city will appeal to you more.
Odin is offline  
Oct 13th, 2015, 10:14 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
How many days do you want to add to the end of the trip?

Stockholm is good for 4 days plus day trips and Copenhagen for 3 days plus day trips - just for the major sights. Both are expensive (but not as bad as Norway) and agree that Copenhagen has - on balance, better food than Stockholm.

I would have a look at the Michelin green guide for the two cities and see which has sights that appeal most to you - based on the number of days you have.
nytraveler is offline  
Oct 13th, 2015, 12:10 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 25,363
Much preferred Stockholm. Click on my name for my TR.
thursdaysd is offline  
Oct 13th, 2015, 05:31 PM
  #5  
kja
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 22,023
I enjoyed both, but think it might depend on how much time you have, as Stockholm easily merits more IMO.

I agree with nytraveler that 4 days is a good base estimate for Stockholm, and strongly encourage at least a 5th day. And I agree with Odin that a trip into the archipelago is a one of the area's great delights.

I thought Copenhagen well worth 2 or 3 days, plus a day for Roskilde.
kja is offline  
Oct 13th, 2015, 05:38 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 13,801
I found Stockholm exceptionally beautiful.
Copenhagen was good for a couple of days , but did not have the same
appeal for me.
danon is offline  
Oct 13th, 2015, 07:16 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,330
I liked both but I think Stockholm edged out Copenhagen by just a little bit. Very impressed with how clean and beautiful it was.
michele_d is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BrunoTraveling
Europe
12
Aug 5th, 2015 12:08 PM
worldly
Europe
10
Aug 31st, 2011 12:53 PM
efishbur
Europe
22
Jul 5th, 2008 03:53 AM
Ethan
Europe
4
Apr 9th, 2005 07:00 AM
yeadonite
Europe
28
Jun 3rd, 2003 03:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -

FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:12 PM.