Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Travel Topics > Air Travel
Reload this Page >

Carry-on size: is this a website typo?

Search

Carry-on size: is this a website typo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28th, 2008 | 03:32 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,419
Likes: 0
Carry-on size: is this a website typo?

From USairways

Carry-on baggage
Size requirements
Up to 51 in/129 cm (11 x 14 x 26 in or 28 x 35 x 66 cm)

26" carry-on? Can this be true?
FainaAgain is offline  
Old Jul 28th, 2008 | 03:35 PM
  #2  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,419
Likes: 0
and this is the link

http://www.usairways.com/awa/content...epolicies.aspx
FainaAgain is offline  
Old Jul 28th, 2008 | 03:42 PM
  #3  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,070
Likes: 0
That seems a trifle small, but still reasonable for a piece of carry-on luggage. Something longer than 26 inches is probably not going to fit wheels first into an overhead bin in economy class. I'd have to see the overhead bins on a USAirways flight to be certain. Unless you're going with some huge suitcase, maybe you're within the limits.
Jeff_Costa_Rica is offline  
Old Jul 28th, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #4  
J62
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,332
Likes: 0
That seems a trifle large, and unreasonable for a piece of carry-on luggage. Something longer than 26 inches is probably not going to fit into an overhead bin in any class.

These rules definitely posted on the USAirways website. To me 11x14x26 is classified as a big suitcase.

J62 is offline  
Old Jul 28th, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #5  
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 23,193
Likes: 0
We flew USAir on 4 flights in June. On all but one of the flights the FA were hauling off suitcases far smaller than this dimension and forcing them to be gate checked.
gail is offline  
Old Jul 28th, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #6  
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 75,025
Likes: 50
Jeff_Costa_Rica: &quot;<i>That seems a trifle small, </i>&quot; Huh? That is larger than most any airline I'm familair.

Most have a 9 x 14 x 21 (or sometimes 22) limit.

FainaAgain: I'd sure double check on that, it seems awfully large to me - but I've never flown USA.
janisj is online now  
Old Jul 28th, 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #7  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,070
Likes: 0
You're right. I just measured and mine is 21&quot; x 14&quot; x 9. It's perfectly adequate for me. I've seen people board with bags bigger than mine though.

Maybe I misinterpreted Faina's original post. I thought you were saying those dimensions were too small for you. That's not what you meant, is it?
Jeff_Costa_Rica is offline  
Old Jul 29th, 2008 | 06:49 AM
  #8  
Jed
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 0
Seems to me that the 'catch' is the 14', which is thin. I don't think any 26' baggage is only 14' wide (mine is 18'), but 11' high is OK.

So the 26' is unrealistic with the total of 51'.
Jed is offline  
Old Jul 29th, 2008 | 07:07 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Some airlines only publish a overall linear dimension anyways. Like Continental, which is 51&quot;. So, nothing special about what USAirways says.

And let me give you one example of an item benefits from this - violin case, as I play the violin. Most are about 31&quot; long, but the other dimensions are well within the other limits.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Jul 29th, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,419
Likes: 0
Somebody on the US board asked this question, and 26&quot; seem too large (HUGE!!) to be a carry-on. I hope, it's a typo

I don't think I even have a 26&quot;! My largest is 24&quot; and only when we both share it.
FainaAgain is offline  
Old Jul 29th, 2008 | 11:29 AM
  #11  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
It is not a typo.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Sep 21st, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
US Airways allows 40lbs/45in linear for carry-on.

Got this from http://airlinealacarte.com

~Star


starburst is offline  
Old Sep 21st, 2008 | 04:11 PM
  #13  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Why would someone rely on a 3rd party site with 2nd hand (or worse) information when USAirways clearly say they allow 51&quot; on board, as clearly stated in the link in the very first reply in this thread?
rkkwan is offline  
Old Sep 22nd, 2008 | 04:59 AM
  #14  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
It says up to 51&quot; (max) so a 11x14x26 would more than likely be a foldover garment bag type rather than a bag with wheels which in most cases are thicker than 14&quot;.
joethekay is offline  
Old Sep 22nd, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #15  
Jed
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,546
Likes: 0
If anyone has a 26&quot; bag, please give us its measurements.
Jed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FerrisFar
Europe
30
Apr 17th, 2013 01:00 AM
Clarin
Europe
10
Dec 1st, 2008 09:43 AM
leeann44
Australia & the Pacific
8
Mar 23rd, 2007 05:12 AM
emckeeve
Asia
17
Feb 8th, 2006 09:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -