Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

NYC: Hudson vs. Muse vs. Doubletree

Search

NYC: Hudson vs. Muse vs. Doubletree

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29th, 2004, 11:48 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NYC: Hudson vs. Muse vs. Doubletree

I'm going to be in NYC from April 30-May 4, and I've narrowed down my options as follows (personal travel, but taking advantage of corporate rates):

Muse (Times Square) $245
Hudson: $220
Doubletree (Times Square) $235

I've stayed the the Muse before and love the place (beds are awesome and they have the fantastic philosphy products), however, I haven't stayed at any of the others. I'd like to keep costs down closer to the $200-$225 range, which leaves the Hudson (or Paramount), but I've seen a lot of negative reviews.

Just wondering which one the seasoned NYC travellers would choose.

Thanks!
TO_dweller is offline  
Old Mar 29th, 2004, 01:15 PM
  #2  
weenie57
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you are going alone, or with only one other person, you probably don't need the room at the Doubletree - they are all suites, with a seperate living room. It is great for families though! The location of the Doubletree is smack dab in the middle of Times Square, it is a mobscene (of course) right outside the door, and there is no real lobby there (it is sort of on a second floor - but no place that I recall with a nice bar). Is the new Gorham Hotel (now called the Blakely) open yet. I loved it there - and that was before they remodeled! I think their new rooms are $225, but I'm not sure when they open.
 
Old Mar 29th, 2004, 02:04 PM
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the suggestion weenie. Unfortunately I'm arriving a day early?Gorham is scheduled to open May 1!

I'm going with my boyfriend so I figured I didn't need the space offered by the Doubletree, but I think I'd prefer it to the Ian Schrager hotels (haven't stayed personally but have read many negative comments).

I don't know what's happening in NYC that weeknd but a lot of places are sold out, so I may just have to spend the $245 for the Muse.
TO_dweller is offline  
Old Mar 29th, 2004, 02:30 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I'm sure you've read: the rooms at the Hudson are tiny! If you and your boyfriend are very small people you might not mind. If you're seeing much theatre then the Muse or Doubletree locations would be more convenient. I do agree with the previous poster that it's a mob scene when you walk out the door of the Doubletree. I've stayed at the Hudson and Doubletree but not the Muse but I've eaten in the restaurant there and like the location.
sgbslo is offline  
Old Mar 29th, 2004, 04:12 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love hudson, but I do not think it is "worth" $220.

Of the 3 hotels you are considering, I would choose The Muse.

I checked quikbook.com for your dates and this looks like a popular weekend in the city. There are rooms at the brand new Maritime Hotel for $245, which might be fun to try?
Margie is offline  
Old Mar 29th, 2004, 04:50 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My I suggest another hotel for you. It's the Michaelangelo, and it is located on 51th between 6th and 7th. It is part of a boutique Italian hotel chain, and is there only location not in Italy. Really a great place; a piece of Europe in the middle of Manhattan. There is a complimentary Italian continental breakfast service each morning in the lobby.We live on Long island, and spend many weekends at this hotel. Website is: http://www.michaelangelohotel.com/
All rooms are large and they are well appointed.
rogfam is offline  
Old Mar 29th, 2004, 05:56 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 8,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My husband and I love the Doubletree. When we go to NYC, it's for a theater weekend, and the location can't be beat. The spaciousness of a suite is wonderful.
abram is offline  
Old Mar 29th, 2004, 06:02 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would second the Michelangelo, but would be surprised if there was a room for less than the $220 mentioned. I entered the dates of April 30 to May 4 and found the hotel sold out in fact.
Patrick is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shar
United States
6
Feb 2nd, 2009 01:51 PM
cdharr0
United States
14
Jun 25th, 2006 11:35 AM
bamakelly
United States
12
Nov 3rd, 2004 04:01 AM
MikeT
United States
10
Jun 17th, 2004 08:14 AM
RLUCIDO
United States
5
Jan 18th, 2004 07:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -