Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Rye, Battle, Leeds, Canterbury - One night trip?

Search

Rye, Battle, Leeds, Canterbury - One night trip?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27th, 2007, 09:18 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rye, Battle, Leeds, Canterbury - One night trip?

I am trying to plan a one night stayover trip to Southeastern London (We will be staying in London for 4 nights, I believe, and have 3 other nights we can spend elsewhere). We definitely want to see Canterbury. We have heard that Rye is a good place to see and spend the night. We would also be interested in seeing Leeds Castle, Battle, Hever Castle, Dover Castle - probably not all of these though, and they are listed in the order of preference. Is there an easy way to accomplish this? I am trying to figure out how we can best do this without having to carry our luggage around as we sight see. I guess this would mean going to our hotel first, and then sight seeing. But then it seems like we would have to travel quite a bit more. We would be willing to stay somewhere other than Rye, if that made more sense.
Thanks for any insight/advice you might have to offer!
BPJ
BPJones is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2007, 09:44 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's way more than you can see in one day. If you're talking about leaving London early one am, staying in a hotel overnight and having 2 full days you can see quite a bit of it - but still won;t have time for everything.

Frankly I wasn;t that enthused by Leeds - way to modern - versus most of your other items listed. We especially enjoyed Dover Castle - including the Roman remains and Battle.
nytraveler is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2007, 10:20 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BP Jones,

In 1998 I traveled to England on my own, at the time I was 63. I picked Rye for a week stay and really enjoyed it. I stayed in The George right on high street. It's a wonderful old hotel. I stayed in the old part. It didn't have an elevator. Reception was wonderful. One young lady brought her children to meet an American Grandmother. The pub and restaurant were very good. I explored the town and surroundings knowing I had a warm comfy hotel to return to in the evenings. I'd love to return to that lovely little town.

Good Luck, Joan
chatham is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2007, 10:28 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leeds Castle near Maidstone is one of the most hyped castles due to its publicity machine but one that after such a build up underwhelms many folk.

Rye is a cutesy place yes.

I loved Hever Castle and Dover is the castle of your dreams

Battle is a great little town and the Battle site and ruined abbey fascinating to me but i'd put it down on your list.
PalenqueBob is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2007, 10:35 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,157
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Battle will always remind me of a time when I went to a huge military reenactment - called something like "2000 years of warfare".

Around lunchtime , in a nearby pub, pint glasses in hand , sat three Roman legionaries, two Normans couple of Naploeonic riflemen and a WWII vintage German. Not something you see every day.

In answer to the original question, Dover castle is great - you could easily spend 5 or more hours there. Canterbury is similarly impressive - not just the cathedral, but the town itself. I have never been into Leeds castle (I got as far as the gates, saw the admission charge, got back in the car and went on to Dover) Hever is very pretty, but IMO, not a true "Castle" in the way that Dover is.
willit is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2007, 10:46 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But Hever reeks of history - one of Henry VIII's wives - Ann Bolyene i think lived there and that makes it intriguing - plus is in such a nice pastoral setting. Hard to easily reach by public transport and via it a long way from Canterbury - there is a Heaver train station but no taxis there - but a nice few-mile walk thru fields to the caslte IF you can find the path. Buses go direct from a larger nearby town however.
PalenqueBob is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 07:14 AM
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, so it sounds like Leeds maybe isn't worth it. I was definitely thinking that we would see some of these things one day, stay over, and then see some things the following day before going back to London. I am having trouble planning the order that makes the most sense though. For example, if we went to Canterbury first, and then Dover, and then the hotel for the night in Rye, and then Battle the next day, we would have our luggage while in Canterbury and Dover. But if we go to the hotel first, we will have to do quite a bit of extra travelling just to be able to drop our bags off. Maybe there is no easy way to plan this . . . but if anyone knows how, I'd really appreciate the advice!
Thanks again!
BPJones is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 07:42 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am more than a bit confused, however, since you are leaving and returning back to London, can't you leave the bulk of things in you London hotel and just take a very small pack for your one night away. But on the other hand you state you want to plan a one night stay, then you go on and mention a 3 night stay. Guess that is the part that I don't follow. In any event. I too suggest you give Leeds castle a pass. Have fun and let us know how it all turns out.
rogerdodger is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 07:47 AM
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a one night stay.
And if we leave our things in the London hotel, we will have to pay for that room, and the room in Rye for the night, which doesn't seem cost effective.
We want to see all of these things with a one night stay over, not three.
BPJones is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 07:48 AM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Completely unrealistic to see all those things in one day IMO
PalenqueBob is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 09:32 AM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are leaving and coming back to the same London hotel, you should be able to have the hotel store your luggage and just carry an overnight bag. There may be a charge for this.

You could also store your bags at a 'left luggage' facility at the London train station (assuming you're traveling by train) - for around 6 GBP per bag per day - and bring an overnight bag with you.
noe847 is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 09:41 AM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it's just for one night, I'd pick Rye or Canterbury and stick with that.
Nonconformist is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 09:44 AM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 72,801
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 7 Posts
Just a few points:

Leeds (it looks like you've already been convinced) is definitely not a "must". The graounds are very nice - but there are twenty other gardens in Kent that are just as good or even better.

Dover Castle is HUGE and takes most of a day to explore. A minimum of 4-5 hours.

Hever <i>was</i> historic but very little of the original bldg is there. It is mainly an early 20th Century remodel/invention by William Astor. Not to say it isn't worth a visit - it is much better than Leeds for sure. The grounds are amazing.

W/i a very few miles of Hever are both Chartwell (Churchill's country home) and Penshurst Place (which is much more original than anything at Hever)

So for a 2 day sojourn - I'd leave early in the a.m. to Canterbury, tour until late morning and then head over to Dover for the rest of the day. Stay in a B&amp;B in mid-Kent somewhere between Dover and Hever. The next day I'd visit Penshurt Place, Chartwell and Hever and then head back to London in the early evening.

Rye is very interesting - but you really need 3 or 4 days to really explore much of Kent/East Sussex.

janisj is online now  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 10:24 AM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our standards must be low. We enjoyed Leeds Castle.

We drove from London to Rochester where we spent much of the day, stopped at Leeds Castle before driving to our BnB, Frith Farm House in Otterden.
jsmith is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 10:28 AM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No one said Leeds wasn't worth it - did say dissapointing when compared to other castles so there are better places for the OP on extremely limited time to dwell in on.

I've been to Leeds and enjoyed it as well but i feel it just doesn't deserve the apparently self-fueled publicity it gets so that folks seem to think it's one of England's finest castles

In fact as castles go it's mediocre - but this is still enjoyable and fine in the overall context.

How many castles have you seen? If Leeds were your first or so then your reaction may be different.

But to unfortunately at times jaded veteran England travelers Leeds is ho-hum

Sincerely
PalenqueBob is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 11:09 AM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 57,091
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
hi, BP,

here's my contribution having lived in Kent for 15 years or so, albeit leaving 10 years ago [but I bet the castles etc. haven't changed much!]

you don't want to stay in dover!
to avoid that, leave London early, get to dover, see the Castle, leave for canterbury. book into hotel [sorry I can't recommend one, but others will I'm sure], spend the rest of the day and night into the town.

set off early for Rye - perhaps taking in the romney marshes and/or the Romney and Dymchurch light railway and winchelsea on the way. Spend the night in Rye.

from Rye, head north to sissinghurst [classic english garden] then through the weald of Kent to Penshurst and finally Chartwell. if you have a third night, spend it in this area, then you could see Hever, Chiddingstone, scotney, leeds castle [great rose gardens in June/July] as well, before heading back to London.

hope that's whetted your appetite.

regards, ann

PS i'd scrub Battle - not much tere besides the castle, and it's a long way off your route.
annhig is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2007, 11:13 AM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not a very long walk from the Hever train station to the castle, maybe a mile or less. There is a painted sign board showing the way. We had a very enjoyable day trip there by train from London.

We have also done day trips to Canterbury and to Rye in different years.

I'm not sure what the breakeven point would be to make two day trips to your chosen destinations by train and not do an overnight away from London, but maybe some of our London posters can tell you.

carolyn is offline  
Old Sep 1st, 2007, 06:20 PM
  #18  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is what I am thinking now, but I do not know if it is a good plan or realistic . . .
I was thinking that perhaps we should start with the Kent area, and go to London after. I also think we should maybe stay 2 nights in Kent, instead of one.
My very tentative plan would be to: take the train straight from Gatswick airport when we arrive to Rye. Perhaps rest for a bit, and then take the train to Battle (@ 50 minute trip) and return to Rye for the night.
Leave the next morning for Dover Castle, and then from there to Canterbury. Head back to Rye for a night's sleep, and then leave for London in the early am. This plan would take care of the luggage issue, because it would just stay in the Rye hotel until we leave for London. This plan puts us at about 2 hours of train time for day 2 (Rye - Dover - Canterbury - Rye).
Does this seem do-able? A good plan?Worth the time on the train to stay in Rye?
Also - some of the suggested &quot;journeys&quot; on the National Rail Web site, leave about 6-8 minutes to catch a connecting train. Is this enough time for someone in is not familiar with the train system there?
Thank you all so much!
BPJones is offline  
Old Sep 2nd, 2007, 06:33 AM
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 6 to 8 minutes to catch the next train should not be a problem. Just check the TV monitor for platform #'s. Sometimes they show the edning station, not the middle one at first, but then they will show all of the stops. Not a problem. If this fails, just ask someone.
rogerdodger is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
texasbookworm
Europe
19
Jan 18th, 2010 11:32 AM
weavermary
Europe
7
Jun 26th, 2007 01:01 AM
dsm22
Europe
21
May 5th, 2005 06:15 PM
P_M
Europe
8
Apr 7th, 2005 04:24 AM
Daisy54
Europe
5
Jan 11th, 2004 12:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -