Young Frankenstein - Broadway
#3
Original Poster
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Honestly, it's been many years since I've seen the film....just can't remember all the details. I'm trying to find something the whole family would enjoy....they think they're too big for Lion King, Mary Poppins, even though I still think they would enjoy them. Any other suggestions?
#5
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
Legally Blonde! Perfect choice.
Frankly I think Spamalot has as much "dirty innuendo" as Young Frankenstein, but I'm a believer in most 12 to 14 year olds being able to handle either. I can just never gage what some parents want or allow their children to see.
Frankly I think Spamalot has as much "dirty innuendo" as Young Frankenstein, but I'm a believer in most 12 to 14 year olds being able to handle either. I can just never gage what some parents want or allow their children to see.
#7
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,832
Likes: 0
I also saw it in Seattle, and really enjoyed it, but some friends who were with us were a little turned off by the language and sexual references...after all, this is Mel Brooks we're talking about. If you saw "The Producers", this one is very similar in terms of R-rated content.
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,965
Likes: 0
I'm curious. What did you find to be R-rated about Young Frankenstein?
It struck me as playful, childish, and fun. The 12- and 14-year-old are sure to get a kick out of the weird science, yodeling, and the rest.
Everything on TV (including Bill O'Reilly) strikes me as being raunchier.
Even if the children are headed for a convent, they should have a little fun before retiring from the world. Do you disagree?
It struck me as playful, childish, and fun. The 12- and 14-year-old are sure to get a kick out of the weird science, yodeling, and the rest.
Everything on TV (including Bill O'Reilly) strikes me as being raunchier.
Even if the children are headed for a convent, they should have a little fun before retiring from the world. Do you disagree?
#9
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,832
Likes: 0
Well, there was one rather egregious use of the "F" word...and then a lot of references to Inga's physical endowments, and of course the "Sweet Mystery of Life" scene...but that may well go over the heads of 12 to 14 year olds. As others have pointed out, the parents should know better than anyone what their kids can handle...if it was a movie, it would probably be rated PG-13 (as was "The Producers".) Personally, I thought it was fine; and I think kids would particularly love Igor - had never seen Christopher Fitzgerald before, and he was great.
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Now you guyz have me completely excited about opening......what to wear??? I've got the door knockers! LOL!
Kamo, I have yet to see it, but unless your 12 and 14 year olds are sheltered, I doubt Mel would put in anything too innapropriate. Hell I had a 13 year old boy that was thrilled to see the showgirls in Spamelot!
Kamo, I have yet to see it, but unless your 12 and 14 year olds are sheltered, I doubt Mel would put in anything too innapropriate. Hell I had a 13 year old boy that was thrilled to see the showgirls in Spamelot!
#12
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
I'm so excited for Christopher Fitzgerald. Several years ago he overwhelmed me off Broadway in his solo performance in "Fully Committed". Last winter he had me on the floor laughing in the two man show, "Gutenberg, the Musical". And this summer he amazed me with his musical talents in the Encores production of Stairway to Paradise with Kristen Chenoweth. He's a force to be reckoned with!
#13
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,832
Likes: 0
Yes, and Roger Bart was outstanding as well. I hope they do something more with Sutton Foster's part as she is so talented and it seems a little under-written. Andrea Martin stole some scenes as Frau Blucher (neigh!), and Shuler Hensley was a delight as the monster, especially at the end...oh, and in the scene with the blind hermit! Classic.
#14
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,886
Likes: 0
There is nothing in the show to shock or even surprise any 12 year old I've ever seen. (I don't think there was even anything that would have shocked us when we were 12 - back in the last ice age.) (I took my 12 year old nephew and friends to see Rent for his birthday last year and they loved it.)
I do agree that they're awfully old for Lion King or Mary Poppins - I would think those are for 10 and under.
I do agree that they're awfully old for Lion King or Mary Poppins - I would think those are for 10 and under.
#16
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
nytraveler, I resent that. I loved Lion King and Mary Poppins and I'm a half century beyond 10! But of course I do realize that some young teens "think" they are too old for shows like Lion King and Mary Poppins. It's their loss.

