Notices

Would you join in a tourism boycott?

Old Mar 14th, 2006, 01:16 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would you join in a tourism boycott?

I'm not trying to start a debate about the underlying issue, but I'm curious if anyone else has been reading with interest the movement toward a boycott of tourism in South Dakota. This following the state's new law that bans most abortions.

If you disagreed, would you change travel plans? Not make future plans?

If you supported the state, would you go out of your way to travel there on vacation?

Me, I support the boycott and wouldn't go there. I actually was there last year and had been making plans to return, so it's not just empty talk.

But I wonder if anyone else feels this way.
sfamylou is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 01:25 PM
  #2  
TheWeasel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No, it wouldn't change my plans either way. I think a boycott would hurt the state a bit with decreased revenue, but at the same time it would hurt individuals who depend on tourism for part or all of their livelihood. The state can afford to take the hit better than the individuals, so any boycott may end up hurting innocent bystanders (so to speak).
 
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 01:27 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 22,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bring back Bill Janklow!!!
ekscrunchy is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 01:37 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ooh, this is a touchy subject. But let's just say that when I see a state pass particularly mean-spirited, regressive and/or anti-human rights laws, I just scratch it off my list of places to visit. The people who elect public officials that enact legislation specifically designed to keep certain people In Their Place just aren't people I want to be around.
rjw_lgb_ca is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 01:55 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No - I would not join a tourism boycott. I don't have firm plans to go to S.D. this year, but if I can carve out some time to go to Custer State Park, I'll go.
wtm003 is online now  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:03 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really is unfortunate when people who "depend on tourism for their livelihood" don't think of the possible economic repercussions of legislation which probably has the least amount of effect on the legislators who are wealthy enough to get around it (by going elsewhere for their "treatments") as it is going through the law-making process.

Intrepid1 is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:08 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The exact opposite to this "not trying to start a debate" thread is the simple fact that there are just as many people or more applauding South Dakota for protecting human life. Those of us who support their legislation will be making a special trip to spend lots of money in their State!
spinedoc is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:11 PM
  #8  
TheWeasel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes Intrepid, that is true, but it's not like every individual in the state voted for the current officeholders.
 
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:15 PM
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spinedoc, read my original post again. I didn't write that I didn't want to start a debate. I wrote that I didn't want to start a debate about abortion, and so far, everyone has been civil about that. I asked specifically if you supported the state would you go there, and I'm glad to hear your response. I'm not sure why you think your post is the exact opposite of what I asked, though.
sfamylou is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:24 PM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sfamylou,

My bad..I missed your 3rd paragraph. However as you are well aware this thread will spark quite a debate and that is the beauty of the USA.
spinedoc is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:26 PM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 93,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
South Dakota is no place I want to visit so the question is purely retorical

and obviously this thread *will* start a debate "about the underlying issue"
suze is online now  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:29 PM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 93,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rhetorical
suze is online now  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:29 PM
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope we can all focus on whether we would cancel a trip or not, based on politics, and avoid the underlying debate. I didn't want to be a trouble maker. I hope that if this thread goes down that path that it gets shut down quickly.
sfamylou is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:44 PM
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No. I would not join in a boycott of SD. If anything I would make it a point to go there in support of their decision.
Sunshinesue is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:45 PM
  #15  
Neopolitan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If I boycotted every state than had policies I didn't believe in, I couldn't go anywhere. In fact I'd have to move -- but can't imagine where I could move to.

And the idea that SD is no state to visit -- wow. Custer State Park, Mount Rushmore, Badlands, Wind and Jewel Caves --some of the most beautiful scenery in the west.
 
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:54 PM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
boycotting somewhere because they ban abortion is just purely messed up. How stupid can you get?

Now boycotting somewhere because of they target foriegners for crimes but are relaxed on their own citizens (like letting them out of jail for multiple murders after 18 months) well thats another story.
bhuty is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:55 PM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, I wouldn't join such a boycott. I find myself at odds with many of my state and country's laws but hope tourists won't boycott coming here!
KathrynT is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 02:56 PM
  #18  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OH and ditto to the previous poster.
bhuty is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 03:45 PM
  #19  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 21,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I refuse to go to Canada until there is a permanent ban on the killing of harp seal pups. So, yes, I would boycott a place for political reasons.
Underhill is offline  
Old Mar 14th, 2006, 03:46 PM
  #20  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 21,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For another viewpoint...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...DGU9GJ6KB1.DTL
Underhill is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

FODOR'S VIDEO