Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

What is security check-in like these days?

Search

What is security check-in like these days?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28th, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
What is security check-in like these days?

For those who have flown recently....do you notice much difference in the check-in process? Do they look inside your carryons and purses, briefcase, etc?

No lipstick?

cabovacation is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2006 | 07:16 PM
  #2  
Dan
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Just random observations from my flights through New Orleans, Chicago O'Hare, San Francisco and atlanta last week, but all security checkpoints were FASTER than before. The fact that so many people are just checking luggage makes the whole process work a lot better although I guess it does slow the baggage checkin/retrieval process a bit.
Dan is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2006 | 07:33 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
The Southwest line at Ontario was out the door on Friday evening. It took nearly an hour to make it to the gate.

On the other hand, the Phoenix airport yesterday had no lines and security was very quick. The woman next to me had her mascara taken from her purse and they took another woman's lipgloss. They were also doing randon spot checks again at the gate.
sightseer is offline  
Old Aug 28th, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 0
It really depends on the airport and in some cases the airline. We have had some flights where we just breeze through security and others where the lines are long. Don't bring any makeup except a tube of lipstick. They will allow that but not lip gloss and other more liquid types of lipstick. Good luck!
Cali is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 10:31 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
I didn't notice much difference in the security process or timing flying out of Minneapolis. However upon returning to Minneapolis, I waited 1.5 hours for my checked luggage. What a pain! They had as many as 6 or 7 flights back up on each luggage return. Lots of people and very little luggage
sweetsailing is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 10:37 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
In coming back from HNL through LAX we passed by three National Guard soldiers inspecting the boarding of just our plane. We flew on Delta. I overheard a conversation between a Delta employee and a soldier who was quite unhappy that an off duty Delta Flight Attendant was allowed to board with her coffee. The guardsman was explaining that he could pull her off of the flight and inspect everything that she owned and told the employee to discuss it with her so it doesn't happen again. While boarding the same employee was behind me discussing the situation with another co worker. He repeated the story and said that he had no intention of saying anything to her. Security is as good as the weakest link.
DawnCt is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #7  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 0
I flew Sacramento to San Diego and return last week- didnt notice any difference in lines and searches than before.
More people checking bags so less carry on bags and boarding and deplaning easier.
Lipstick is allowed -
sunbum1944 is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 10:46 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
Based on a trip earlier this week -- in carry-on: tube lipstick, yes. Lip gloss and Chapstick, no.
michelleNYC is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,296
Likes: 0
DawnCt, that's an eye opener. I hope you wrote/emailed Delta about this.
BayouGal is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
No but perhaps I should. We flew the red eye from HNL and I didn't give it much thought until now.
DawnCt is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #11  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
I'm hearing lipstick is ok. It's the liquid lipgloss that's not acceptable.
Here's some info from the Office of Travel and Tourism Industries that might clarify:

"No liquids or gels of any kind will be permitted in carry on baggage.... This includes all beverages, shampoo, sun tan lotion, creams, toothpaste, hair gel, and other items of similar consistency.

Exceptions: Baby formula and medicines, which must be presented for inspection at the checkpoint."

Wendy Piquette
C-USA Travel Guide
www.c-usa.info
wpiquette is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 12:38 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,322
Likes: 0
I still wonder about the fact that commercial cargo put in the hold of the airplanes are not being screened. I read SFO has or is going to start screening the commercial cargo there. But what about the rest of the airports? That to me seems like a very large security gap.
LoveItaly is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #13  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 98,204
Likes: 12
Seattle thru Dulles to Bradlee last week and in reverse. Yes they look inside your carryone and purses both at the security check point and again at the gate before boarding. Tube lipstick was OK. The difference I noticed was things seemed more organized and better staffed.

I am sure this varies depending on when and where you are flying.
suze is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 01:06 PM
  #14  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
I've flown quite a bit in the past few weeks. Check-in is taking a slightly longer than usual, as more people are checking bags. Going through security is taking more or less the same.
Jean_Valjean is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #15  
SAB
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,614
Likes: 0
Out of SFO and EWR last weekend, got through security in 10 mins in each place--no long lines, no issues, no one looked in my bag.
SAB is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 02:49 PM
  #16  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,694
Likes: 0
Flew through Milwaukee a week ago Sunday. At least two passsengers boarded with bottles of water held in plain sight. Not a word was said and the two of them apparently quenched their thirst while the rest of us waited with dust-dry throats for the beverage carts.
Toucan2 is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 03:09 PM
  #17  
Neopolitan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Interesting about that off duty flight attendant at Delta. Last week flying American from Las Vegas to Los Angeles, an off duty American pilot was boarding with a Starbuck's and the guy at the gate made him toss it, which he did without complaint after gulping most of it. Almost immediately after that the regular pilot or co-pilot entered with a cup of Starbuck's and the guy started to prevent him, but then decided since he was flying the plane he could have his coffee. We all sort of laughed.
 
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #18  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
I ALWAYS drink lots of water while flying. Are the airlines now giving out entire bottles of water once on board, or are they still pouring those teeny 4 oz cups?

I'm thirsty just thinking about this.
joan is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 03:27 PM
  #19  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Security was easy this weekend to and from DFW/SFO. Leaving SFO, they simply asked if I had any lotion or mascara, but no one looked in my bag. However, companion walked right on with a bottle of coke in hand before he realizing it and throwing it away. Yes, I had lipstick.

Joan, I'm also an a water addict and told the flight attendant as soon as I walked on board that I need a bottle of water. She said she couldn't give me a bottle but immeidately poured me a cup out of a big bottle and I took it with me to my seat. I made sure my cup did runneth over until the absolute last minute before we landed!
jayne1973 is offline  
Old Aug 29th, 2006 | 03:30 PM
  #20  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 98,204
Likes: 12
No they will not give you a bottle of water, but it was available by the cup by walking back to the galley.
suze is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -