Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

U.S. cities with lighter traffic

Search

U.S. cities with lighter traffic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 02:54 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
U.S. cities with lighter traffic

I am currently living in metro Atlanta, which holds its title with the third worst traffic in the nation, and sits in first place as the most expensive city to commute in. So with our sweltering summers that necessitate setting the car a.c. at at a high speed, and with our three minute long traffic light wait times and congestion, on top of all of the suburban sprawl, driving around here can be a huge pain in the behind, to put it lightly. Can anybody tell me of any cities where traffic isn't such an aggravating issue?
Metalbird91 is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 02:57 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly not here (chicago), I'd like to know as well, the traffic where I live has become completely out of control, it is a miracle anyone gets anywhere. I haven't driven in awhile (I'm downtown with no car) but I did the other day, I drove in from the burbs to the city during the morning rush hour, and about ripped out my hair, I don't know how people do it everyday without going completely bonkers.
Vittrad is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 03:04 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DFW is far worse and the officials have no clue.
M
mikemo is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 03:19 PM
  #4  
KMK
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cleveland, OH is decent with respect to traffic. Not too huge to navigate; I spent 6 years living on one side of town and having to cross 480 twice a day at rush hour, and it wasn't bad at all...know plenty of people who live in far outlying suburbs & commute across town or into downtown...sure, an accident can bring things to a standstill, but usually thing motor right along.

The downside...you have to live in northeast Ohio. And good luck finding a job in that economy these days.
KMK is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 03:29 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buffalo, NY - We moved here from Alexandria, VA and our stress level has plummeted. You can get from any suburb to the city in under 20 minutes.
kcapuani is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 03:47 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the only cities that don;t have really awful traffic - are the ones that aren't really cities (just technically). Traffic is part of what makes a city.
nytraveler is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 04:04 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Austin Texas- we by no means have the lightest traffic in the world, but I lived in Houston for 3 years and it is much better mostly because we are not such a huge metropolis. I know people from L.A. who say that traffic is easy compared to L.A., but I am not sure if that is really saying much.
ilovetulips is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 05:04 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Austin has the worst traffic and Buffalo does not see the sun for three or more years in a row.
M
mikemo is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 05:13 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll kindly take issue with that Buffalo comment - we had several days over 90 degrees this summer. Of course this was abnormal for the region, but normally our summers are very pleasant with temps in the high 70's/low 80's. Plus just because there is snow on the ground doesn't mean that it can't be sunny out...
kcapuani is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 05:14 PM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rochester, NY -- "Commuting Heaven" compared to other areas. I almost moved to Atlanta last year due to a job transfer, and decided against at the last minute. However I spent quite a bit of time in Atlanta ... Nice area, but what a commuting headache! So much of life ends up revolving around commuting and time in the car, or trying to travel at weird times to beat the rush ... really can affect your quality of life after a while.

We have a "20 minute rule-of-thumb" ... that is it is generally 20 minutes from the suburbs to the downtown area, or to go from one suburb to another.

Even in the winter, the communities are very equipped in snow removal quickly, so the roads are generally clear by the time you're heading off to work (unless it's an exceptionally bad storm that's still hitting during the "rush" hour).

Cher is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 05:19 PM
  #11  
stjohnbound
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have to agree with Austin having awful traffic. It's not just the traffic but the drivers in general. It's not unusual to see people doing 50 mph in the middle lane, and merging seems to be a totally foreign concept. I won't even get into all the cell phone usage. And I'm from Florida...I never in a million years would have thought that anything could be worse than the drivers in Florida!
 
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 05:31 PM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
madison, WI (the city in which i went to college) has decent traffic. and great quality of life, all-around.
lynnejoel1015 is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 05:47 PM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I lived in Indy for 10 years and though rush hour can be like any other city, for the most part you are at last moving ~ and there are alot of different routes that one can take to get to a final destination. It's a great city and very under-rated.

I just returned from a week long visit and am amazed at what great houses you can buy on large, tree-lined lots for not that much $$.

Another area that I highly recommend and travel to often, are the NW burbs of Milwaukee - traffic moves pretty quickly there also.

Of course, both of these places are in the good ol' midwest - snow, sleet, rain........
cfntmpn is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 08:11 PM
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 8,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Milwaukee is an easy city to get around.

We have good regional theater, lots of interesting restaurants, professional sports, symphony, ballet, a good park system, and Lake Michigan.
abram is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 08:18 PM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Utica, NY.
Topeka, KS
East Podunk
Bumphuk, Egypt

but why, "metalbird", are you planning a no-traffic vacation?????
rb_travelerxATyahoo is offline  
Old Aug 31st, 2005, 08:26 PM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall a columnist in the new yorker once stating that any city worth living is difficult to park in. I'm inclined to agree, but I still hate the traffic.
Vittrad is offline  
Old Sep 1st, 2005, 05:53 AM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was stunned by the lack of traffic in San Diego, even during rush hour. It's weird. There are tons of cars on the interstate but none on the city streets.
j_999_9 is offline  
Old Sep 1st, 2005, 08:24 AM
  #18  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rbtravelerx: The real reason I'm seeking a place with lighter traffic is so that I can move there. The maximum length of a traffic light should only be a minute. In Atlanta, the reason so many people run red lights is because it is a three minute wait if you miss them, and it seems like the lights only give you 7 seconds to go through them before turning yellow! I am not justifying running red lights; it is dangerous. But that is why people run them.
Of course vacationing somewhere with light traffic is also a plus! Imagine sitting in traffic just to go to the beach! But I guess Florida is like that sometimes. I was surprised at the amount of cars on the road in St. Augustine. Maybe everybody there drives because it is too hot to ride a bike!
Metalbird91 is offline  
Old Sep 1st, 2005, 08:37 AM
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rather than moving somewhere just because the traffic isn't bad, wouldn't it be better to find a city you love, then set up your life so you live close to your job and the activities you enjoy? Or find a city with great mass transit? I live in Seattle, and people who live far from their jobs constantly complain about the traffic, but I live in a neighborhood with lots of shopping/restaurants, etc, and great bus service to my job downtown, so I don't ever experience the traffic.

After all, if people are going to move to other cities to avoid traffic, yet continue to commute in their cars, you're just making the situation in that city worse.
christy1 is offline  
Old Sep 1st, 2005, 08:43 AM
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
christy, I'll carry your point one step further. I'm always amazed by people who live outside those traffic laden cities and say "I'd never live in the city, the traffic would get to me". Yet they drive back and forth through it every day when they work in the city. I guess it never sinks in with them that if they lived IN the city, they wouldn't be in all that traffic every day.
Patrick is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -