Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Security/Immigration at US Airports

Search

Security/Immigration at US Airports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28th, 2004 | 12:55 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Security/Immigration at US Airports

I am travelling to San Francisco from the UK soon. I have been told that the waiting in line at security and immigration at major airports is currently horrendous.
Would I be better off travelling via Pittsburgh or Charlotte (which will also save me $100)so that I can enter there; or should I bite the bullet and go direct to San Francisco?
Thanks for any suggestions, Greybeard
greybeard is offline  
Old Jan 28th, 2004 | 02:23 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Just go direct to SF. The line in SF could not possibly add more time to your trip than the plane change, plus you'd have the added anxiety of making a connection.
Anonymous is offline  
Old Jan 28th, 2004 | 04:22 AM
  #3  
Dan
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Go direct to SF. I was stuck at US Immigration last year for 90 minutes in Charlotte and missed a connection!
Dan is offline  
Old Jan 28th, 2004 | 04:51 AM
  #4  
Community Builder
40 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
1m Airline Miles
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,770
Likes: 0

Go non-stop to SFO. The one-stop would save $100 but would cost you 4 hours extra, maybe more. If you fly non-stop then you won't have to worry about the weather in PIT or CLT.
mrwunrfl is offline  
Old Jan 28th, 2004 | 05:47 AM
  #5  
GoTravel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The flight time between Charlotte and SFO would be four hours plus the time you would spend de-boarding, collecting luggage, customs, rechecking luggage, waiting on plane, reboarding, yadda, yadda. This would add at least 6 hours to your trip at the very least.
 
Old Jan 28th, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,886
Likes: 0
In general you're better off at the larger airports - even though the lines look enormous they usually have many more agents working so the lines move more quickly. The only time this doesn't work is if weather causes a huge # of planes to land at once - and I don;t know how to determine this in advance.
nytraveler is offline  
Old Jan 28th, 2004 | 07:17 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,106
Likes: 0
I was just at the San Francisco International Terminal this last weekend, seeing someone off.

The International Terminal opened recently, is large, and looks to be very efficient. From the looks of it, coming in and checking through customs and immigration will be a breeze as compared to some of the older airports on the East Coast - thinking of my nightmare entry at Philadelphia last year!

Another vote for flying directly into SFO.
easytraveler is offline  
Old Jan 28th, 2004 | 07:22 AM
  #8  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,107
Likes: 4
I arrived at LAX on Jan 2 from London on a completely full United flight. At immigration, there were at least twice as many agents processing non-citizens as there were working with US citizens. The numbver of passengers in each line was about the same. It seemed that most passengers,if not all, including non-citizens, got to the carousel before the luggage.
Barbara is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MaggieOB
United States
6
Apr 25th, 2012 04:20 PM
Marcoph
United States
5
Feb 9th, 2012 10:47 AM
beckytx
Caribbean Islands
13
Jun 28th, 2008 12:14 PM
jules39
Air Travel
10
Mar 21st, 2008 09:12 AM
GP
United States
8
Aug 15th, 2006 08:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -