Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Park Hyatt v Ritttenhouse

Search

Park Hyatt v Ritttenhouse

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26th, 2002 | 06:12 AM
  #1  
bob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Park Hyatt v Ritttenhouse

Staying 2 nights in December - the Park Hyatt is around $120 per night and the Rittenouse is around $170 per night. I have read that the Rittenhouse is one of the world's best hotels - is this correct? Or is the Park Hyatt just as good? Any comments appreciated.
 
Old Oct 26th, 2002 | 06:52 AM
  #2  
Jackie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Now that's DEFINITELY going too far.
The Rittenhouse is a nice hotel.
But please don't start rumors that it's one of the WORLD'S best.

It's only the 3rd best hotel in its own city.

It's not one of the top 15 hotels in the northeast IMO. Rooms are nice but a bit dated feeling. It's an older hotel and has a certain character you don't find in newer luxe cookie cutter hotels (many Ritz Carltons). But it's also not the spotless perfection you expect in a newer Four Seasons either.

Sure, it's a great place to stay in an excellent location. But don't get this 'world's best' tag started.
 
Old Oct 26th, 2002 | 08:20 AM
  #3  
bob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Fair enough - just regurgitating what I read on expedia, quickbook etc. I'm not saying its true though. How about a view on it compared with the Hyatt if you are so knowledgeable!
 
Old Oct 26th, 2002 | 04:26 PM
  #4  
Brian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There's no question that the Rittenhouse is the better hotel, in line with the rates you were quoted.
The question for you is, is the extra cost worth it?
Both are older hotels with plenty of character. The Ritt is better maintained and has nicer furnishings. The PH is nice, but is more mainstream nice than elegant nice.
Why are you comparing these two, instead of Rittenhouse vs. Ritz, for example?
 
Old Oct 26th, 2002 | 11:29 PM
  #5  
bob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for those helpful comments - the comparison is mainly about price. The 4S and Ritz are both about $80 per night more than the Ritt - hence the comparison.
 
Old Oct 27th, 2002 | 06:15 AM
  #6  
Frank
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Check out the Westin and the Sofitel, great hotels, great locations.
 
Old Oct 27th, 2002 | 10:49 AM
  #7  
Erin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've stayed at the Rittenhouse before - a very nice hotel, (although not one of the world's best). To answer your question about the views - you either get one of the city or Rittenhouse Square - a nice city park. Either way, you're fine. Above messages are right about the feel of the hotel - however the bathrooms have that new feeling (shower & tub, tv, phone, etc). I haven't stayed at the Park Hyatt, so I cannot give a comparison, sorry.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flyer
United States
8
Jan 11th, 2009 07:09 PM
arnesen
Asia
6
Nov 3rd, 2004 07:29 AM
zainab
United States
8
Jul 29th, 2004 09:10 PM
bogart04
United States
14
May 1st, 2004 11:47 AM
teadrinker
United States
7
May 16th, 2003 05:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -