Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Grand Canyon Skywalk

Search

Grand Canyon Skywalk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20th, 2007 | 07:46 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Grand Canyon Skywalk

Does anyone really plan on doing this, let alone being the first ones? I'm sure it's safe, but I get nervous looking over balconies. And what about earthquakes or high winds? Maybe I'm just being paranoid.

HUALAPAI INDIAN RESERVATION. The Skywalk, which will be unveiled Tuesday, is being touted as an engineering marvel. The glass-and-steel horseshoe extends 70 feet beyond the canyon's edge with no visible supports above or below.

For $25 plus other fees, people will be able to see 4,000 feet straight down to the canyon floor, a vantage point more than twice as high as the world's tallest buildings.
MinnieNo1 is offline  
Old Mar 20th, 2007 | 09:40 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
I get a kick out of your "for $25 plus other fees". The other fees amount to $50 per person, so it is a total of $75 for each person visiting the skywalk.
NeoPatrick is offline  
Old Mar 20th, 2007 | 09:45 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
It looks like a financial disaster waiting to happen, to be abandoned in a few years but sitting there ruining the surroundings for centuries.
joesorce is offline  
Old Mar 20th, 2007 | 10:00 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,959
Likes: 0
I might spend $10 on it, but at $75 a pop me and mine won't be going near the skywalk.

Just wait til the Indians start fencing off large portions of the rim in their territory, so visitors can't get the same basic view for free.

If they're intent on defacing landmarks they would have made a lot more money by building a gambling casino on the rim.
fdecarlo is offline  
Old Mar 20th, 2007 | 10:58 AM
  #5  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 0
they did build a casino. Most of the visitors come from Las Vegas and aren't interested in gambling. The casino closed after about a year
bigtyke is offline  
Old Mar 20th, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,912
Likes: 0
We are going to the Canyon for the first time in June, staying on the South Rim. If the Skywalk were convenient to where we are staying, which it's not, I would pay $25 to walk out on it...but $75 is hard to justify, imo.
AnnMarie_C is offline  
Old Mar 20th, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
I am not thrilled with the overhang either but at least it will be quiet. I would rather they ban all helicopter flights over the Canyon first.
cgrk is offline  
Old Mar 20th, 2007 | 03:55 PM
  #8  
GoTravel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think if it will help a group of people pull themselves out of poverty then it is an excellent idea in my book.
 
Old Mar 20th, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,959
Likes: 0
If they're able to build and run casinos, they should be able to handle two years at DeVry.
fdecarlo is offline  
Old Mar 21st, 2007 | 08:08 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 0
Agreed, GoTravel.
Nora_S is offline  
Old Mar 23rd, 2007 | 05:05 PM
  #11  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
It for sure won't be quiet. The Hualapai's main attraction up until they open the skywalk is that they're the only place where you can ride a helicopter to the bottom of the canyon. And a good portion of their visitation arrives from vegas by helicopter.
gcmaven is offline  
Old Mar 23rd, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
You would have to pay ME to go out on it. I'm terrified of heights!!!
luvtravl is offline  
Old Mar 25th, 2007 | 06:55 AM
  #13  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
I see multiple problems with the skywalk. It's sufficiently scary that a lot of people won't go on it (lost revenue). It's ten times more expensive than it needs to be to generate maximal revenue ($7.50 would be fine; $75 is not). It's in the middle of nowhere, and isn't spectacular enough in itself to justify a special visit. And the engineering strength of the structure has been overstated, although I'm sure it's more than sufficient to hold 120 people.

I'm not worried about it spoiling the scenery. The Grand Canyon is a big place, and one little walkway isn't going to make any difference. (Of course, if this were the beginning of a trend, that would be different.) But I don't think it will prove very profitable, either. And my guess is that the outside investor from Las Vegas (the one who put up the $30 million to build it) wrote the agreement such that he is guaranteed a return on his investment first, before anything goes to the tribe.

I heard a member of the tribe say that there's no local gas station. That may be true, but there are plenty of equally isolated spots in the U.S.; those who don't like such places can move to the cities. And if a tribe wants to live the way its ancestors did, it doesn't need gasoline, does it?

You can get used to anything, in time. The Hualapai are no doubt quite used to the giant canyon in their backyard, so sending endless helicopters down into it or building skywalks over it doesn't bother them, as long as it makes money. Religion and tradition are fine when they work in your favor, but easy to ignore when they stand in the way of profits.

I wonder what the plan is for inspection of the steel and glass for corrosion, rust, cracks, and the like as the structure ages. It certainly isn't likely to be there for hundreds of years, unless it is very well and regularly maintained indeed. The canyon will still be there, however.
AnthonyGA is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #14  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Just a little FYI - Did some more research on the Skywalk as was thinking of doing it during a trip in Sept-the actual price is $80 per person. The $75 does not include tax. In my books that's highway robbery of a different sort, and I won't be doing any peering over the edge there. I'll do it for free somewhere else in the canyon. I'm all for the Hualapai Indians making some money for their tribe, but this is just total GOUGING!
skikat9 is offline  
Old Jun 20th, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #15  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 0
The Skywalk is on Hualapai reservation land and is actually in a side canyon. Since it is Hualapai land, the tribe is free to use it to help themselves have a better life. I hope this is not going to turn into another debate as to whether this should exist or not. It is, in fact, helping the Hualapais. We can all choose to go and see this (and pay for it) or not.
FauxSteMarie is offline  
Old Jul 9th, 2007 | 09:01 AM
  #16  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Did the Skywalk a few weeks ago and the price was in and around $27, I can't remember the exact price but it wasn't much more than this.
JoanieJ is offline  
Old Jul 9th, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #17  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Joanie, but how much did you pay per person to get onto the reservation?
frank_and_beans is offline  
Old Jul 31st, 2007 | 05:15 PM
  #18  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
And did you enjoy it? And why can't I find it on Mapquest?
cynstalker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aabha
United States
7
Mar 25th, 2011 10:38 AM
Luvs2travel
United States
8
Jul 29th, 2008 05:48 PM
skitravel
United States
8
Mar 10th, 2005 08:21 AM
AmandaF
United States
10
Aug 24th, 2004 06:02 PM
sarahtor
United States
7
Nov 2nd, 2003 04:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -