First Time to California
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
First Time to California
We are just in the beginning planning stages of a trip to California for three couples with teenagers. Tentatively planning to fly into LAX. Nobody in our group has ever been to California. Some of the things on our to do list: Hollywood, L.A., two days at Disneyland, and Santa Monica pier. We originally wanted to rent a large house for all of us, but have been a bit frustrated in what we are finding. We've got suggestions from a few people to search Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, and Santa Monica for houses but have not been very successful. Could anyone with experience and knowledge of those areas help me out or suggest an area to stay? We wanted to stay in the house for the entire week but I'm thinking that would not be the best choice. Any help would be appreciated
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
#2


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,499
Likes: 4
Most of the beach cities have banned short-term (less than a month) rentals. And one location for L.A. plus Disneyland would mean lots of driving, much of it in heavy traffic.
Marriott Residence Inn properties and other apartment-hotels would be an alternative. In Manhattan Beach, look at the Sea View Inn.
http://www.theseaviewinn.com/
Marriott Residence Inn properties and other apartment-hotels would be an alternative. In Manhattan Beach, look at the Sea View Inn.
http://www.theseaviewinn.com/
#3
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,597
Likes: 0
You may do better finding family accommodation near Disneyland. And it's sort of central.
There has been a backlash against AirBnb type rentals, which may be why you are finding it difficult in beach communities.
I would start looking for hotels.
There has been a backlash against AirBnb type rentals, which may be why you are finding it difficult in beach communities.
I would start looking for hotels.
#4

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,540
Likes: 2
Go directly from LAX to Disneyland/Anaheim and book there for 3 nights/2 days. Then move to West Hollywood for the rest of your stay, unless it's July Aug Sept when you'll want to be even further west for the lower temps. Short term rentals in Santa Monica are illegal and Huntington/Newport can be 2 hrs in the car to Hollywood.
How big is the group in total? Sounds like 9, minimum?
How big is the group in total? Sounds like 9, minimum?
#6


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,499
Likes: 4
There is a new Marriott Residence Inn in the L.A. LIVE section of downtown Los Angeles. All rooms have full kitchens, you can request adjoining accommodations, and there's a pool. From this location, you could use public trans for some of your sightseeing, esp. Hollywood and downtown museums.
http://www.marriott.com/hotels/trave...geles-la-live/
http://www.marriott.com/hotels/trave...geles-la-live/
#7
Original Poster
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Thank you everyone for your suggestions, I really appreciate it! I wasn't aware that short term beach rentals were banned in a lot of areas, obviously that's why we're not having much success finding a place. I will check out the properties you all suggested.
clarkgriswold, there are 11 in our travel party.
clarkgriswold, there are 11 in our travel party.
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 0
I would definitely split your stay with 3 nights in Anaheim and the remainder in the LA area. I would also split up into several hotels or condos (if you can find one with less than a week requirements), as 11 people in one place, might start to get on one another's nerves after awhile, to say nothing of trying to organize everyone (herding cats, anyone?).
#13
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,597
Likes: 0
Actually, janisj, they are far more likely to find a large rental house in Anaheim near Disneyland than in the other locations they are asking about (HB, Santa Monica, Newport Beach)/
https://www.flipkey.com/anaheim-vaca...?sleeps-min=10
https://www.flipkey.com/anaheim-vaca...?sleeps-min=10
#14

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 35,153
Likes: 0
Even if you could find some house for 11 adults (teens count as adults) in an expensive beach community, it would cost an absolute fortune. Hardly any houses are that big, anyway.
There is actually a 4 BR house in Santa Monica for rent on VRBO, however, have no idea what it costs, but I bet a bundle. http://www.vrbo.com/710126
or this one http://www.vrbo.com/212727
Don't know about the laws, though. It might be more realistic not to target some of the most expensive beach areas in LA (like Santa Monica). Like try El Segundo or something more modest, as well as inland places, that's a good idea. I still don't think there are very many houses that big.
Here's a 5 BR place in El Segundo for only about $740 a night, for example. http://www.vrbo.com/692271
There is actually a 4 BR house in Santa Monica for rent on VRBO, however, have no idea what it costs, but I bet a bundle. http://www.vrbo.com/710126
or this one http://www.vrbo.com/212727
Don't know about the laws, though. It might be more realistic not to target some of the most expensive beach areas in LA (like Santa Monica). Like try El Segundo or something more modest, as well as inland places, that's a good idea. I still don't think there are very many houses that big.
Here's a 5 BR place in El Segundo for only about $740 a night, for example. http://www.vrbo.com/692271
#15
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,959
Likes: 0
Lynn412, in addition to the above suggestions also check Pacific Palisades and Malibu, e.g.
http://www.vrbo.com/vacation-rentals...ific-palisades
Not all beach towns have banned short-term rentals, and frankly I don't understand how these bans have survived legal challenges. Government does not have the right, regardless of what it might claim, to dictate minimum or maximum rental lengths on private property. So the point is, it doesn't take much searching to find listings that either sidestep the ban or ignore it altogether. If I was a property owner in one of these cities I'd definitely opt for the second of those choices.
http://www.vrbo.com/vacation-rentals...ific-palisades
Not all beach towns have banned short-term rentals, and frankly I don't understand how these bans have survived legal challenges. Government does not have the right, regardless of what it might claim, to dictate minimum or maximum rental lengths on private property. So the point is, it doesn't take much searching to find listings that either sidestep the ban or ignore it altogether. If I was a property owner in one of these cities I'd definitely opt for the second of those choices.
#19

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,540
Likes: 2
Your right to rent-out your property cannot infringe on your neighbor's right to quiet enjoyment. It's not as if they're banning this practice against the will of the majority of the neighborhood.
But then, this really is not the place for a legal discussion, it's rude to hijack a thread in such a manner.
But then, this really is not the place for a legal discussion, it's rude to hijack a thread in such a manner.


