Drinking Age in NYC?

Old Mar 30th, 2010, 04:42 PM
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 26,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

That and a nickel will get you a cup of coffee, as my mother used to say (a long time ago, obviously)
sf7307 is offline  
Old Mar 30th, 2010, 05:14 PM
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clubs and restaurnts serving primarily young people will generally be stricter - because they are checked by the liquor authority more often (the police don;t get involved in this unless it causes a crime of some sort). And often the liquor authority is there because of complaints from neighbors about drunk kids and too much noise in the street.

In a restaurant it can vary - very upscale places may not card - casual places are more likely to.

Dance clubs are strictest - since it's very difficult to et both a liquor and cabaret license - and if they are lost the owner is out a huge investment. (But many underage kids do get i - with fake ID. My step-daughters both went clubbing from 18 on - I didn;t ask where they got the ID - but had no objection -since in Manhattan there are no cars involved - just a cab home.
nytraveler is offline  
Old Mar 30th, 2010, 06:01 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
> I prefer to look at it as an opportunity to practice civil disobedience,
> in the great tradition of Thoreau and Gandhi.

Then I suggest you take the time to read what "civil disobedience" IS. It is NOT violating a law and then trying to hide the fact in order to avoid the consequences of it. Civil disobedience means violating the law and being VERY public about that fact, and then daring the authorities to impose the consequences for your violation. Gandhi didn't secretly make salt with the hope that he wouldn't get caught -- he VERY publicly stated he would disobey the law, VERY publicly did so, and VERY publicly accepted arrest for doing so.

You think the law is so unfair that you don't think you should pay any attention to it? Fine. But don't call this "civil disobedience." Unless you contact the authorities in advance of your doing so, and accept whatever punishment they impose on you, it isn't.
PaulRabe is offline  
Old Mar 30th, 2010, 06:20 PM
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Blue noses have no sense of humor.
Fra_Diavolo is online now  
Old Mar 31st, 2010, 06:13 AM
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ascribing the 21 drinking age laws to "puritanism" simply flies in the face of current realities. YOu need only have a look at the TV commercials of companies such as Budweiser, Miller, et al to realize that they are selling drinking as just a fun thing to do. Companies are wise enough not to promote their product in a way that flouts prevailing mores. What was true in the 1920's and before just doesn't apply today. And to ascribe the lack of drinking regulations in Europe to their dedication to "freedom" is a hoot. The reason millions of Europeans came to America was to escape the onerous conditions prevailing in various areas of Europe.
jroth is offline  
Old Mar 31st, 2010, 07:39 AM
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26,710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here in Europe, we have a long philosophical tradition of freedom and civil rights. We think the state should not interfere in the lifes of the citizens
__________________________________________________ ____

This tradition must be at least 35 years old considering the deaths of Salazar in Portugal and Franco in Spain.

Or myabe it was 1991 with the fall of the Societ Union and the now many independent European states.

Or maybe the tradition is yet to start with the EU imposing laws on different countries and cultures that they never had before.
Aduchamp1 is offline  
Old Mar 31st, 2010, 09:58 AM
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although the OP seems to be under the impresion that regulating drinking is an American phenomenon and an aspect of "Puritanism" - it is worth looking at the historical facts. First- the Puritans were not opposed to imbibing alcohol - and they did their share. Second - The Temperance Movement of the 19th century (this is the movement that started anti-alcohol sentiments and wound up with the 18th Amendment) - started in EUROPE - Scotland, Britain, Norway, Sweden - so much for European attitudes towards "civil rights" and "freedom:. The movement was picked up in the 19th c. by outfits like the WCTU in the U.S. - but they had nothing to do with Puritanism.
jroth is offline  
Related Topics
Original Poster
Last Post
United States
Dec 17th, 2014 08:12 AM
United States
Feb 13th, 2008 05:50 AM
United States
Nov 26th, 2007 10:40 AM
United States
Nov 9th, 2006 05:35 AM
United States
Nov 8th, 2006 04:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 PM.