Charlotte and Raleigh nuclear power plants
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Charlotte and Raleigh nuclear power plants
Husband and I are considering moving to either Charlotte or Raleigh area. Huntersville or Cary perhaps. We have 2 small kids. I just learned that there are nuclear power plants nearby. (Shearon Harris and McGuire) Worried about long term health concerns. I currently live in NJ and the nearest power plant is 35 miles away and is much smaller than the plants in NC. Should I be concerned about these nuclear reactors? Are there any safety concerns regarding these plants? Do they use the recreational lakes to cool the power plants? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
#3
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,107
Likes: 0
Worked in nuclear power for >5 years in the Navy. No problems except genitals glowing a soft green, which can be quite helpful when -- censorsed by Fodors ---, or finding the toilet in a dark bathroom.
OK, seriously ... Nuclear power is SO regulated that I'd really have a lot more issues with OTHER industries than I do with nuclear power. Size of the plant would be of little concern to me, as if there were ever a problem with release of fission products, any release would be bad. I'd count on a larger plant to have a larger staff to monitor and prevent problems.
On the ship I was on, I originally had to work in "the plant", as well as stand my "watches" in the plant too. At a later time I was transferred to a "topside workcenter" -- in other words, my 8-5:30 working location was the entire ship OUTSIDE the propulsion areas, but I still stood my watches (usually 4 hour shifts, twice a day) in propulsion areas. Strange as it may seem, my exposure counts were higher when I spent less time in the area you'd expect to be worse. Natural background radiation that we all are exposed to was greater than in-plant radiation.
I'd be more concerned about various manufacturing plants, motor traffic, especially if there are frequent traffic jams, fossil fuel plants, and the chemicals used on lawns before I would worry about nuclear power plants.
My standard reply to those who would ban all nuclear plants is to ask them if they'd be willing to reduce their own electrical consumption the 23%-45% contributed by NP to the state grid.
OK, seriously ... Nuclear power is SO regulated that I'd really have a lot more issues with OTHER industries than I do with nuclear power. Size of the plant would be of little concern to me, as if there were ever a problem with release of fission products, any release would be bad. I'd count on a larger plant to have a larger staff to monitor and prevent problems.
On the ship I was on, I originally had to work in "the plant", as well as stand my "watches" in the plant too. At a later time I was transferred to a "topside workcenter" -- in other words, my 8-5:30 working location was the entire ship OUTSIDE the propulsion areas, but I still stood my watches (usually 4 hour shifts, twice a day) in propulsion areas. Strange as it may seem, my exposure counts were higher when I spent less time in the area you'd expect to be worse. Natural background radiation that we all are exposed to was greater than in-plant radiation.
I'd be more concerned about various manufacturing plants, motor traffic, especially if there are frequent traffic jams, fossil fuel plants, and the chemicals used on lawns before I would worry about nuclear power plants.
My standard reply to those who would ban all nuclear plants is to ask them if they'd be willing to reduce their own electrical consumption the 23%-45% contributed by NP to the state grid.
#6


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 23,193
Likes: 0
Much of the country lives less than 100 miles from nuclear power plant. My guess is that if your smaller plant in NJ 35 miles away decided to melt down, you would also have trouble there.
If it were me, I would find something else to worry about - but that is just me. If you are going to feel insecure living that close, then no amount of statistical info will help and you should look elsewhere. Logic and statistics do not usually govern what we fear (if it did, I would not be a terrified flier!)
If it were me, I would find something else to worry about - but that is just me. If you are going to feel insecure living that close, then no amount of statistical info will help and you should look elsewhere. Logic and statistics do not usually govern what we fear (if it did, I would not be a terrified flier!)
Trending Topics
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Agree with rb.
Sheen, I don't mean to sound ugly but with everything going on in the world today I think maybe your Nuclear Power plant anxiety is due to something deeper. It certainly wouldn't hurt to talk to a professional.
BTW, my dad was a nuclear engineer for 40 years. Nuclear power is the greenest power.
Sheen, I don't mean to sound ugly but with everything going on in the world today I think maybe your Nuclear Power plant anxiety is due to something deeper. It certainly wouldn't hurt to talk to a professional.
BTW, my dad was a nuclear engineer for 40 years. Nuclear power is the greenest power.
#12
Original Poster
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Thanks to everyone for your responses. I don't know much about power plants except for what you hear in the news, which is usually negative. So, I really appreciate your knowledge on this topic. As far as the one posting saying I should seek professional help... all I can say is that I am just a concerned parent. No facility is 100% safe and I was just inquiring as to whether there have been any safety issues regarding those plants. Thanks for your concern though;-)
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sheena8
United States
6
Aug 30th, 2005 06:04 PM




