Are the FODORS discriptions of hotels and restaurants usually accurate?
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
It's true, the Ranta and Raves are all over the place, one persons 4 is another persons 1, but I have found Fodors reviews pretty much on the mark, with one exception.
For obvious reasons, they aren't always up to date. The reviews in a guidebook from 10 years ago is sometimes the exact same (verbatim) as a current book.
In an effort to remedy this, I'll be the first to volunteer to stay at many hotels anywhere, on Fodors of course, and provide them with updated reviews. How about it Fodors?
For obvious reasons, they aren't always up to date. The reviews in a guidebook from 10 years ago is sometimes the exact same (verbatim) as a current book.
In an effort to remedy this, I'll be the first to volunteer to stay at many hotels anywhere, on Fodors of course, and provide them with updated reviews. How about it Fodors?
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
I can? I can afford to stay anywhere in the world? Oh goody, I didn't know that. Someone's been holding out on me. Thank you for telling me. I must get going...Garcon, get me the Plaza Anthenee on the phone quick, and then the Concorde, Au revoir mis amis!
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
o, I don't know about that! I kinda like what Nina has to say. And she's earned the right, too. The leaves are all raked - right? - and now she has time to post. I do hope Fodors agrees to your hotel suggestion. I'd like to sign up too. You may keep europe - I'll settle for the far east.
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
"bought and paid for" hit the nail on the head.
The travel books won't say anyhting negative, and that's the biggest reason I like travel boards.
Always true that some people will complain about everything. But in general I'm more interested in the negative comments than the positive ones. The negs are more telling in most cases.
The travel books won't say anyhting negative, and that's the biggest reason I like travel boards.
Always true that some people will complain about everything. But in general I'm more interested in the negative comments than the positive ones. The negs are more telling in most cases.
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have found Fodors to be fairly accurate. But you have to also read the comments to see why someone is rating it real bad or real good.
That way you can decide which group corresponds with your views.
BUT as far as restaurants are concerned,I've always personaly found Zagot to be the best. I always pick one up when I travel.
That way you can decide which group corresponds with your views.
BUT as far as restaurants are concerned,I've always personaly found Zagot to be the best. I always pick one up when I travel.
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
I've stayed at a few of the hotels on Fodors lists, and have foung them accurate.
Re: They don't list any hotels with negatives:
There are hundreds of hotels in, for instance, NYC. Why would they waste space on hotels they found lacking?
If people don't like hotels they choose from a guidebook, that guidebook starts to lose credibility. When people post on a Web site, how do you know THEIR motive for recommending a hotel?
Re: They don't list any hotels with negatives:
There are hundreds of hotels in, for instance, NYC. Why would they waste space on hotels they found lacking?
If people don't like hotels they choose from a guidebook, that guidebook starts to lose credibility. When people post on a Web site, how do you know THEIR motive for recommending a hotel?
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MRand
United States
13
Nov 26th, 2012 12:07 PM