Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

What's The Covid Situation In California Now?

Search

What's The Covid Situation In California Now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19th, 2020 | 04:10 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
What's The Covid Situation In California Now?

What's the covid situation in California now, Is it safe to travel especially during Thanksgiving?
NorenePalmer is offline  
Old Nov 19th, 2020 | 04:11 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,597
Likes: 0
Unsafe to travel. Sorry.
mlgb is offline  
Old Nov 19th, 2020 | 04:12 PM
  #3  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,112
Likes: 83
It's bad everywhere.

https://apnews.com/article/cdc-guide...f1433e6a3e2efd
Melnq8 is offline  
Old Nov 19th, 2020 | 04:28 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,597
Likes: 0
OP other states would appreciate it if you confined yourself to Texas instead of trying to find "someplace warm".

California just got a new curfew order starting Saturday. Nothing should be open nor should anyone be traveling between 10pm and 5am.
https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/11/19/st...d-of-covid-19/

Last edited by mlgb; Nov 19th, 2020 at 04:34 PM.
mlgb is offline  
Old Nov 19th, 2020 | 05:44 PM
  #5  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 26
It isn't safe to travel here, especially during Thanksgiving. Enjoy yourself being alive at home.
MmePerdu is offline  
Old Nov 19th, 2020 | 05:55 PM
  #6  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,446
Likes: 4
A virus expert on the news tonight put it plainly... "Better to be home for Thanksgiving than in the ICU for Christmas or Hanukkah."
Jean is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2020 | 07:37 AM
  #7  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,990
Likes: 4
Also, upon arrival in California from absolutely anywhere else, you are expected to quarantine for fourteen days.
Barbara is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2020 | 07:59 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,597
Likes: 0
I got Norene mixed up with orangepetal, the Texas person who needed to go somewhere warm. Regardless, assuming Norene has a home, they should stay there. California just had their highest daily total of COVID-19 cases.
mlgb is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2020 | 10:46 AM
  #9  
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 74,969
Likes: 50
Originally Posted by Barbara
Also, upon arrival in California from absolutely anywhere else, you are expected to quarantine for fourteen days.
Quarantine is definitely recommended but not required nor enforced. There is no check/follow up that one is quarantining or self-isolating. That being said the rules change by the day (sometimes by the hour) and now is a terrible time to even consider travel out here.

I personally think the curfew is a needless/silly rule -- why is it any more dangerous to be out at 11PM that a 8 or 9?? If socializing in bars/lounges/clubs is what they want to control -- do that, don't mandate a curfew.
janisj is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2020 | 10:51 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 25,597
Likes: 0
The problem is as much private gatherings as it is bars etc.

But yeah, without enforcement it's essential meaningless.

Maybe Newsom should fine himself for his French Laundry stunt.
mlgb is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2020 | 04:26 PM
  #11  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 23,435
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by janisj
Quarantine is definitely recommended but not required nor enforced. There is no check/follow up that one is quarantining or self-isolating. That being said the rules change by the day (sometimes by the hour) and now is a terrible time to even consider travel out here.

I personally think the curfew is a needless/silly rule -- why is it any more dangerous to be out at 11PM that a 8 or 9?? If socializing in bars/lounges/clubs is what they want to control -- do that, don't mandate a curfew.
The curfew has also been called a "limited stay-at-home restriction"

Without a complete lock down, maybe like the earlier French lock down, it is easier to restrict commercial venues than private gatherings. Anything but a complete lock down is a compromise, especially when testing and tracking are inadequate.
Michael is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2020 | 07:26 PM
  #12  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
Stay away from Orange County. Our hospitalizations and ICU cases are going straight up, https://www.latimes.com/projects/cal...orange-county/.
bon_voyage is offline  
Old Nov 23rd, 2020 | 07:37 AM
  #13  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
California would be a useless place to come for vacation right now. I wouldn't risk it because the rules are changing daily.
lynni is offline  
Old Nov 23rd, 2020 | 08:26 AM
  #14  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 35,148
Likes: 0
The traveling is safe enough if by car, it's the stopping anywhere and staying that is th eproblem.

The curfew isn't silly and especially not "needless". It is definitely needed given the spread. First, closing early limits the time exposure if anyone who has been there all night.That is important. Not only for clients, but for the people who work in these places. Furthermore, it sets a tone, also, and generally affects the thinking of people. Also, people who stay out real late at night often tend to act differently, they are just not the same kind of people going out to dinner at 6 pm. Besides, closing early means less people overall that night are possibly exposed given places have limits on how many people can be in them at once. Furthermore, studies have shown (contact tracing) that the number of exposures doubles after 9 pm compared to earlier in the evening.

I agree totally closing down bars would be better, but this is better than nothing.
Christina is online now  
Old Nov 23rd, 2020 | 09:39 AM
  #15  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 3
Not a good idea. We are, for the most part, on semi lock-down. There's not a lot of reason to travel when nothing is really open except for essential. And the idea of going somewhere to get take out to eat in your hotel room doesn't strike me as being fun.

I suspect the reason for the 10 p.m. curfew is the fact that the most predominant age group in the last few months, at least in Los Angeles County, is the 18 - 29 age group. This appears to be the group feeling most of the pandemic "fatigue", although don't get me wrong, those of us in the 60+ age group feel it the same, but we acknowledge that just because it weighs down heavy on us, we're generally smart enough to not play roulette with our lives. I think I started thinking this way the year I came to the realization that I was not immortal or invincible!

Anyway, from what I've seen and read, the age group described above is more likely to stay out late outside at bars, or clubbing, even if on the rooftops of apartment buildings or renting a party house. And friends are not socially distancing at outdoor drinking/dining spots, or wearing masks (which they don't have to if eating or drinking).

We also had the Dodger win, the Lakers win, Halloween, the election partying and what-not. And even though there was a lot of mask wearing, the crowds generated by these events helped create the issues we now face. Not to mention the cooler weather making outdoor dining and drinking in LA less inviting.

Surfergirl is offline  
Old Nov 23rd, 2020 | 09:57 AM
  #16  
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 74,969
Likes: 50
"First, closing early limits the time exposure if anyone who has been there all night"

"Besides, closing early means less people overall that night are possibly exposed given places have limits on how many people can be in them at once"

The problem is this forces anyone/everyone who is out into a shortened period so there are bigger crowds. We aren't talking about someone being on the town for the whole night -- just for example going to dinner or meeting at the pub. They've learned in the UK that the curfew means people - especially younger adults - will rush out to socialize during the shorter hours so most venues will be more crowded than if they were open longer and could space out the crowds. Plus it really increases the numbers using public transport at the same time (not that big an issue in most parts of the States) I could see maybe a cut off/limit for liquor sales at 10 or 11PM but not a curfew. This will end up like Prohibition -- with 'underground' breaking of the rules and even more spread.
janisj is offline  
Old Nov 23rd, 2020 | 05:03 PM
  #17  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,446
Likes: 4
California has worse Covid numbers in every category than all but a handful of COUNTRIES. Los Angeles County has just closed outdoor dining at all restaurants for a couple of weeks, so we're back to take-out only. Bars have been closed for months.

A curfew gives law enforcement the authority to disperse groups, gatherings, house parties, etc. The City of L.A. has also given law enforcement the authority to cut the power to residences (usually AirBnB) where no-gathering regulations are being violated.
Jean is offline  
Old Nov 24th, 2020 | 07:01 AM
  #18  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,518
Likes: 0
I live close to SFO, and our main shopping street (Burlingame Ave) has dozens of outdoor dining areas for the many restaurants. As daylight savings ended and it got colder, these outdoor dining places became encased in plastic or wood, with a roof - which pretty much made them into an enclosed dining area - just like inside dining. Of course, the only people wearing masks are the servers. It is not surprising that the Covid rate has increased. We only do carry-out from some of these restaurants.

Stu Dudley
StuDudley is offline  
Old Nov 24th, 2020 | 05:37 PM
  #19  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,446
Likes: 4
Pasadena is defying the L.A. County ban on restaurant patio dining. It is one of three cities in the County that has its own health department (Long Beach, Vernon are the other two), and it says it will watch its daily numbers and react accordingly. Unless they plan to build a high wall or a wide moat, there will likely be a huge spike in visitors/diners who will bring the virus with them.
Jean is offline  
Old Dec 2nd, 2020 | 05:09 PM
  #20  
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
"As daylight savings ended and it got colder, these outdoor dining places became encased in plastic or wood, with a roof - which pretty much made them into an enclosed dining area "

VERY CLEVER
Chile_Traveller is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -