Manuel Antonio vs. Osa Peninsula?
Mar 8th, 2007 | 03:03 PM
#2
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,541
Likes: 0
Osa, hands down.
MA is much more developed and much busier. Osa is still kind of wild, with a very basic infrastructure & many nice, simple, beautiful lodges. The amount of wildlife you would see at MA can no way compare to Osa, much, much less and not as varied.
MA is much more developed and much busier. Osa is still kind of wild, with a very basic infrastructure & many nice, simple, beautiful lodges. The amount of wildlife you would see at MA can no way compare to Osa, much, much less and not as varied.
Mar 9th, 2007 | 06:46 AM
#3
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Totally agree. In retrospect, we would have cut out MA in favor of more time in the Osa Peninsula.
The beaches at MA are beautiful and easily accessible. But you definitely won't be secluded or alone. We saw so much more wildlife in the Osa, too.
The beaches at MA are beautiful and easily accessible. But you definitely won't be secluded or alone. We saw so much more wildlife in the Osa, too.
Mar 9th, 2007 | 09:30 AM
#4
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
This is the beach inside the park:
http://costa.rica.typepad.com/photos...costarica.html
MA is the most popular destination in CR, i like it but its RIGHT on the beaten path.
http://costa.rica.typepad.com/photos...costarica.html
MA is the most popular destination in CR, i like it but its RIGHT on the beaten path.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeanique
Mexico & Central America
3
Jan 2nd, 2018 08:27 AM
