Traveling to Italy
May 18th, 2005, 03:43 PM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Traveling to Italy
I will be traveling to Italy this summer.
I have not been on a airplane for many,
many years. I will be traveling with one
of my teen-agers. Is it better to have only
one change. One of the airlines goes from
Northern California to Munich and Munich to
Italy. The other airline travels from Northern California to Atlanta, then from
Atlanta to Paris and Paris to Italy. It seems alot easier to make one change. If anyone has suggestion or ideas to make the
trip easier, please respond. Thank You!
I have not been on a airplane for many,
many years. I will be traveling with one
of my teen-agers. Is it better to have only
one change. One of the airlines goes from
Northern California to Munich and Munich to
Italy. The other airline travels from Northern California to Atlanta, then from
Atlanta to Paris and Paris to Italy. It seems alot easier to make one change. If anyone has suggestion or ideas to make the
trip easier, please respond. Thank You!
May 18th, 2005, 03:49 PM
#2
Without comment on any of the airports in this scenario, it is always better to have fewer stops and therefore less opportunity for things to go wrong, luggage to be lost, etc.
May I ask which airline(s) you're considering?
May I ask which airline(s) you're considering?
May 18th, 2005, 03:50 PM
#3
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, I would say one change is preferable to two. Less chance of delays, missing flights, etc. However, you should also look at the layover times to see how much time totally you would be travelling. If you have a very long time in Munich, it might be better to do the other route.
May 18th, 2005, 03:56 PM
#4
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi alpicella,
Where in Northern Cal are you flying from? I fly from SFO and there are usually many, many more options than either through Munich or Atlanta/Paris...
But in general, I agree with the other posters: the fewer stops the better.
Where in Northern Cal are you flying from? I fly from SFO and there are usually many, many more options than either through Munich or Atlanta/Paris...
But in general, I agree with the other posters: the fewer stops the better.
May 18th, 2005, 04:51 PM
#5
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 45,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Alpicella, can you fly from SFO (San Francisco) airport? If so I like the KLM flights. You change plans in Amsterdam, and then fly onto Italy. I too think the less stops the better. The Amsterdam airport is IMO very user friendly and one of the nicer airports.
The website for the San Francisco airport is www.flysfo.com. The website for the Amsterdam airport is http://www.schiphol.nl/.
To book with KLM you contact Northwest Airlines. Their website is www.nwa.com. Their phone # for International Reservations is 1-800-477-4747.
Whatever you decide, have a beautiful trip. And I have always found teen-agers love Italy, and know that you will. Best wishes to you.
The website for the San Francisco airport is www.flysfo.com. The website for the Amsterdam airport is http://www.schiphol.nl/.
To book with KLM you contact Northwest Airlines. Their website is www.nwa.com. Their phone # for International Reservations is 1-800-477-4747.
Whatever you decide, have a beautiful trip. And I have always found teen-agers love Italy, and know that you will. Best wishes to you.
May 18th, 2005, 05:01 PM
#6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi
as mentioned, see how long the layover times are between flights. One change with a 6 hour layover is much worse to me than two changes each with a one-hour layover. To me, 4 hours is unacceptable (but I have lots of flight choices). Less than a one-hour layover is chancy, because if you have to change terminals to go from one plane to another, you may be cutting it close on time, especially if your arriving flight is delayed even a few minutes.
I hope you can find a flight with perhaps only one short layover. Since you haven't flown in a long time, check with your airline(s) before you book so that you understand all of their security and luggage requirements. There may be retrictions not just on the size of a carry on bag,for example, but on its weight. You need to know that some items are now prohibited in carry on luggage, and some items are prohibited completely.
as mentioned, see how long the layover times are between flights. One change with a 6 hour layover is much worse to me than two changes each with a one-hour layover. To me, 4 hours is unacceptable (but I have lots of flight choices). Less than a one-hour layover is chancy, because if you have to change terminals to go from one plane to another, you may be cutting it close on time, especially if your arriving flight is delayed even a few minutes.
I hope you can find a flight with perhaps only one short layover. Since you haven't flown in a long time, check with your airline(s) before you book so that you understand all of their security and luggage requirements. There may be retrictions not just on the size of a carry on bag,for example, but on its weight. You need to know that some items are now prohibited in carry on luggage, and some items are prohibited completely.
