Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Scotland & England in 10 Days (Wales?)

Search

Scotland & England in 10 Days (Wales?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1st, 2017 | 02:05 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Scotland & England in 10 Days (Wales?)

My husband and I are going to Scotland & England with a visit to a granddaughter in St. Andrews. We will be driving.

The first 5 days, we plan to fly into Edinburgh, 2 days in Edinburgh, 3rd night at Saint Andrews, then spending the next two days driving through Dundee, staying at Stirling, Glasgow with night 6 back in Edinburgh.

On night 6 we fly into London & rent a car. We've been to London, so I was thinking to the west of London, including stone henge, bath, the lake district and maybe the south area of wales. & I do want to see Kensington Gardens. We will have 3 days to travel the area with 1 night in london on both ends.

Any thoughts?

Thank you in advance for your help.

Sincerely,

Susan
goldgrits1 is offline  
Old May 1st, 2017 | 02:28 PM
  #2  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,849
Likes: 26
If you have a look at a map the Lake District is just south of Scotland so you could choose to do your driving into the far north of England, eliminating the second half of your proposed itinerary, so just Scotland & the Lakes. Actually not a bad idea.

Otherwise, with just 3 days, time for a Bath, Salisbury/Stonehenge loop before departure with a night for London.
MmePerdu is online now  
Old May 2nd, 2017 | 05:28 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Hello,

Just looking at your itinerary, for what you want to do you could easily base yourself in or around Stirling after St Andrews. There's not really much in Dundee (yet - I'm from near there originally!) so unless there's a particular reason to visit I wouldn't bother. You could also consider staying longer in St Andrews and taking trips to the East Neuk villages, and Stirling itself is less than an hour's drive along the A91.
keithl is offline  
Old May 2nd, 2017 | 07:19 AM
  #4  
ESW
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Lake District and South Wales cannot realistically be done from a London base - they are too far unless you are planning on at last one night there and with your limit of three days are just not practicable.

I would second MmePerdues suggestion of a Bath, salisbury and Stonehenge loop for the three days. Throw in places like Wells, Sherbourne, Laycock Abbey, Shaftesbury and you could have a really good trip....
ESW is offline  
Old May 2nd, 2017 | 09:07 AM
  #5  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 30,724
Likes: 4
I might just check if there is an easy flight from Glasgow or Edin down to say Bristol, so that you save one trip in and out of London.
bilboburgler is offline  
Old May 2nd, 2017 | 09:36 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
I would suggest you count travel time separately and then see how much of your total time that actually means you will have left to spend IN places and seeing/doing things.

For example, you will not spend 2 days in Edinburgh at the beginning of your trip. You will arrive in the morning jet-lagged. By the time you get to your hotel, check-in, unpack, etc. You will be left with a half day at best to spend walking around in Edinburgh jet-lagged. You will really only have one full day, on day 2, in Edinburgh. Most people would not consider that enough time to do Edinburgh justice at all. Most people consider the arrival day and departure day on any trip, as total write-offs.

On day 3, you drive up the cost to St. Andrews. If you drive right past all the East Neuk coastal villages, you will probably get to St. Andrews for lunch with your grandaughter or for dinner if you stop enroute in a village or two like Anstruther, Crail, Pittenweem. So you won't have even one day in St. Andrews at all. Pity.

Every time you move, you lose time to making that move. It may be only a half day, it may be most of the day but you can't count it as time IN a place. The more you move, the less time you actually spend doing and seeing things. In travel as in many things, less is more. The less you move, the more you see and do.

Figure out your travel time realistically and then see what percentage of your time you are going to lose moving. Then decide if you think that is a percentage you are willing to lose.

As I read it, you plan to stay in 6 places perhaps. That means 5 moves. I would count that with your arrival day and departure day as 7 days more or less lost. If your entire time is 14 days, that is 50% of your time lost. You can argue you will only lost a half day on one move or another but the fact remains you will spend a large percentage of your time moving rather than being in a place seeing and doing things. That to me is not best use of your time.
Dogeared is offline  
Old May 2nd, 2017 | 09:37 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Oops, I just noticed your title says 10 days. Even worse!
Dogeared is offline  
Old May 3rd, 2017 | 10:11 AM
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Thank you for all the insite.

I think the lake district is out and will rework our plans to spend less time moving. planning on taking the stonehenge loop.

We fly in to edinburgh and out of London.
goldgrits1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
laquebecoise
Europe
18
Apr 11th, 2014 03:55 AM
laurafromtexas
Europe
19
Jun 19th, 2011 01:08 PM
milliebest
Europe
5
Jun 1st, 2010 06:19 AM
pan333
Europe
4
Sep 30th, 2004 02:40 PM
egghead
Europe
8
May 12th, 2004 03:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -