Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Scandinavia in the spring!

Search

Scandinavia in the spring!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5th, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Scandinavia in the spring!

Hi, everybody! Happy New Year!

Thank you for all the advice you've given me on previous posts. Now your comments are welcome again!

Scandinavia trip has been moved to late April or early May. Can you share your experiences with me? Best airline, best city to fly into (Berlin or Brussels seem to be cheapest thus far), train or car, names of small commuter flight airline city-jumpers to save time...we've got 12 days max. Stockholm is paramount, Oslo would be nice, considering Helsinki...

Also, any suggestions on crash courses in language? I know a tiny bit of Norwegian, and I know it's a close relative of Swedish, but I'd like to learn more as a courtesy to native speakers.

Thank you so much for sharing your wisdom with me!

Sue
showgirl626 is offline  
Old Jan 5th, 2008 | 04:45 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,886
Likes: 0
If you want to see Scandinavia flying into/out of Berlin or Brussels is a complete waste of a couple of your VERY limited number of days.

As far as what to do/see

Agree that Stockholm is the biggest hit - you should have at least 4 full days there

Copenhagen is also worth at least 4/5 days once you add day trips to Roskilde and Helsingborg etc

Oslo is cute but has less to do = you can see a lot in 2 days - but then to see the fjords will be a couple of more days

I found Helsinki the least interesting of the group

And you've left your self little time for countryside.

I would fly into Stockholm and back out of Copenhagen (or vice versa) putting Oslo in if you think you 'll have time (I wouldn't in 12 days).


nytraveler is offline  
Old Jan 11th, 2008 | 05:43 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
if you find the time go Bergen or Stavanger + west country instead of Oslo
rjsol is offline  
Old Jan 11th, 2008 | 06:36 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 26,778
Likes: 0
A couple of thoughts:

1) You should be flying. The distances between the cities you mention are pretty substantial. And neither gas nor trains are particularly cheap in Scandinavia.

2) I would double-check my math. I would be a little surprised if flying into Berlin or Brussels saved you enough money to offset the cost of getting from those cities to Scandinavia.

3) I wouldn't worry about the language. Everybody in Scandinavia speaks English and I have yet to meet anyone who will admit to being offended that others don't speak their language. Scandinavians are nothing if not practical and recognize that maybe only 15 to 20 million people speak a Scandinavian language. Indeed, many major companies in Scandinavia have switched to English-language workplaces in recognition of this.
travelgourmet is offline  
Old Mar 11th, 2008 | 02:50 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
good for you ! and if 12 days is all you have then 12 is well spent anywhere other than on home turf i say !
most people simply cant get time off work for much longer and i find that i can cram in quite a lot and still fly home feeling sated..( ok i must be very shallowbellied and easily pleased!! )
im not waiting til i have more time to travel...ill be retired then and who knows what my health will be like..ive seen too many folk counting on those big trips once theyre out of the workforce and then one of them gets sick and there go their plans
im using up my youth ( what precious little of it is left) and even if its poor value for money ..id rather do a 10 dayer than nothing at all...
it is probably awful as far as jetlag is concerned but still ill take it!
ill be watching this thread..hope you get lots of responses...please report back!
lanejohann is offline  
Old Mar 11th, 2008 | 03:14 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
nytraveler-do you mean Helsingoer
Odin is offline  
Old Apr 15th, 2008 | 01:29 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,360
Likes: 0
Agree with travelgourmet about the language. You can feel confidant that any person under 50 will be able to speak with you in English.
Orlando_Vic is offline  
Old Apr 15th, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
In all of Scandinavia just say TAKK (thank you) and you'll be fine. I too think Helsinki is the least interesting. Oslo has wonderful things to see, don't miss it. Stockholm is wonderful esp. the Vassa Museum. Stavanger and Bergan are also charming cities if you have the time.
kleroux is offline  
Old May 4th, 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Norwegian is pretty easy as languages go, and even Danes and Swedes (in my experience) are sometimes pleased that you know some. The "Teach Yourself Norwegian" book goes a long way in a short amount of time. Like English, Norwegian has modal verbs like "Can, may, must, will, shall"... and they're very similar to English.

And yeah, 98% of people will speak English, and good English, but if you learn even a few cute phrases you'll make friends. Ha det på badet (The Norwegian equivalent of 'See you later alligator') especially impresses people for some reason...

Not that I'm an expert or anything, but Scandinavian languages are fun, so if you have any time and energy for it, you'll find a little goes a long way.
Mirachan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jennadom
Europe
16
Jul 5th, 2019 05:24 AM
sobepal
Europe
14
Jul 10th, 2014 03:36 AM
pittsburgh
Europe
19
Aug 14th, 2011 05:35 PM
angel025
Europe
8
Mar 9th, 2011 04:47 PM
cparris
Europe
6
Jul 3rd, 2005 08:43 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -