Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

London Hotel for 3 Days Sightseeing

Search

London Hotel for 3 Days Sightseeing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 06:27 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
London Hotel for 3 Days Sightseeing

We are going to London and Paris in May 2014 and I would like suggestions for hotels in London. I have been told that the Kensington area is central to many restaurants, shops and museums. Would $300 US be the right amount for a charming hotel in Central London?
bonlou30 is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 06:44 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11,786
Likes: 0
Take a look at londontown.com. You can search for lodging by type, location and price. Your budget is probably good for a charming and moderately-priced place.
Tabernash2 is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 06:47 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,561
Likes: 0
<< I have been told that the Kensington area is central to many restaurants, shops and museums>>

Need to do more research.

First, what do you want to see?

Second, what is "three days"? How many nights is your stay?

Third, Kensington is NOT central to museums. South Kensington is.

$300 will get you adequate accommodations, but what is "charming" to you?
BigRuss is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 07:58 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,886
Likes: 0
Depend on

1) what you mean by charming
2)how many people you are

Kensington is a pleasant area not too far from the center. We prefer Mayfair or Knightsbridge and expect a decent size room/baby suite in a charming hotel for 2 to be about $500 plus.
nytraveler is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 08:04 AM
  #5  
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 75,042
Likes: 50
I agree w/ BigRuss. <u>South</u> Kensington is close to sites/museums/easy transport connections - especially from LHR. Kensington is a different neighborhood.

Other areas to search would be Russell Sq/Bloomsbury (near the British Museum), Covent Garden (in the very center of many major sites), Victoria (near the river/Buckingham Palace and good transport links), Southwark/Southbank (near the Globe theatre, Tate Modern, St Pauls and the Tower of London)

Any of these should have hotels w/i your budget - $300/£185 won't be luxury but nice enough.
janisj is online now  
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 08:05 AM
  #6  
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 75,042
Likes: 50
Re nytraveler's post -- Mayfair and Knightsbridge are probably the two most expensive areas for hotels. Which is why I didn't suggest them.
janisj is online now  
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 10:17 AM
  #7  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
South Kensington is a great neighbourhood to stay in. I can highly recommend The Ampersand on Harrington Road, I was there for 9 nights this past July.
Very charming hotel with really good, friendly staff. Great food and drinks in their restaurant, Apero, too. Gorgeous room called the Drawing Room for afternoon tea or champagne and snacks.
The decor of the hotel is fresh and whimsical.

It is just across the street from South Kensington tube station and surrounded by great places to eat and shop. Very short walk to the Natural History museum and the Victoria and Albert museum.
A small double room is 180 GBP or American $286.40 (this room is probably very small, better for one person but might be okay for a short stay )
A Superior room (which we had) is 222.00 GBP or American $353.22 (if you were able to up your budget a bit)

www.ampersandhotel.com/
raincitygirl is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 12:05 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
the St Giles near Tottenham court road tube is the best priced, best located hotel in London. Otherwise the travelodge Charing Cross is good, although they don't offer luggage storage. Both these hotels are a stone throw from Leicester Sq, China town, the West End theatre district, Trafalgar Sq, etc
burnie is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 12:49 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,886
Likes: 0
Um, would either of those qualify as "charming"?

I'm not really sure what the OP means by that.

Quaint? Antique furniture? Or funky?

Upscale? Modest but pretty decor?
nytraveler is offline  
Old Sep 17th, 2013 | 01:45 PM
  #10  
Community Builder
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 75,042
Likes: 50
The St Giles isn't terrible (in fact I'm stay there for 2 nights next month. Not my choice exactly -- it is one of the package hotels for the 49er/Jacksonville NFL game)

But I'd never recommend it for someone seeking 'charming' . . . or even comfortable. I'm staying there 2 nights because I have to - then I'm moving to a nicer property.
janisj is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
floridapugmom
Europe
12
Apr 2nd, 2012 08:10 AM
JulTravels
Europe
16
Jan 16th, 2011 11:47 PM
alyap35
Europe
7
Sep 7th, 2006 06:33 AM
Peggy
Europe
25
Nov 30th, 2003 02:13 AM
Susan
Europe
13
Jul 9th, 2002 03:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -