Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Italy firstimer: Which city to start, which to depart?

Search

Italy firstimer: Which city to start, which to depart?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11th, 2004 | 11:52 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Italy firstimer: Which city to start, which to depart?

Will visit Italy on my own for two weeks before flying into London and do further one month trip. My journey would cover Rome, Florence, Venice, Milan, and the Cinque Terre.
Is it good to visit Rome, then Florence, Venice, Milan, and Cinque Terre, before catching a train back to Milan airport? I?m afraid that if a train delays, I?ll lose other transport connection. Which is better: Milan Linate or Milan Orio something?
Or should I do Rome, Florence, Cinque Terre, Milan, and Venice? Should I choose Venice Treviso or Venice Marco Polo airport?
Or should I start with Venice, Then Milan, Cinque Terre, Florence, and visit Rome the last and fly to London from Rome Ciampino?

I?d like the transfer to be quick and safe and convenient. Need your consultations. Thanks in advance.

Jane Post
JanePost is offline  
Old Jul 12th, 2004 | 01:51 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 0
We just got back from our honeymoon starting in Rome, heading to Florence and lastly Venice. We had a car once in Tuscany but took trains between cities and had no problems whatsoever. Personally, I loved how we worked out the trip. Each place became a bit quieter and I don't know that I would've wanted to end in Rome. Don't get me wrong, we loved Rome and it's hustle and bustle, we just thought things were perfectly planned. We had open jaw flights and that was great too because we wasted no time backtracking. Why don't you see if you can fly into one city and out of another? I don't think it cost us more--and even if it had been a bit pricier, it was still worth it!
OneWanderingJew is offline  
Old Jul 12th, 2004 | 04:28 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Do you want to tackle all this in just 2 weeks? If so, start in Rome and work your way to finish in Venice.
Rome to Florence by train (although not experiencing what's between seems a shame). Vist Cinque Terre as a dat trip from Florence and then train to Milan.Finally finish with a train to Venice.
You'll be spending a good percentage of your valuable time traveling, but I'm sure you will enjoy your trip.
jabez is offline  
Old Jul 12th, 2004 | 04:45 AM
  #4  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
The least stressful approach is to work things so that your last destination of interest happens to be your departure gateway. If you fly into (or out of) Venice, I would suggest VCE (Marco Polo) as it is closer than Treviso. It is also a beautifully designed airport, very efficient and hassle-free.

I'm sorry, I've only used Rome's main airport at Fiumicino (Leonardo da Vinci) not Rome Ciampino, so I have no idea how easy (or difficult) the transfer to the latter.

"OneWanderingJew" reports that he/she would rather finish in Venice and start in Rome because Rome is more hectic; I would do the reverse, for exactly the same reason. Good luck with your plans.
Sue_xx_yy is offline  
Old Jul 12th, 2004 | 05:00 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,637
Likes: 0
Hi
do a search here on
bobthenavigator.

bob is an expert on suggesting itineraries, and his past postings should be a good deal of help in addition to the suggestions above.

The idea from above of ending Italy with a quieter location before going on to London seems like a good idea to me as well.
elaine is offline  
Old Jul 12th, 2004 | 05:50 AM
  #6  
ira
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Hi Jane,

Why Milan?
ira is offline  
Old Jul 12th, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,525
Likes: 0
I agree with Ira--why Milan?
I would plan on 4 destinations and either start in Rome and end in Venice--or vice versa. The choice would depend on the best price/connection from your US gateway and the connection to London. Allow enough time in Florence to allow for day trips to Siena and perhaps Lucca by local transport. Maybe something like this:
Arr Rome--3 nites
Train to Florence--4 nites[day trips]
Train to CT--3 nites[location is key]
Train to Venice--last 4 nites

Just reverse that if starting in Venice. Good luck, and spend some time at slowtrav.com for other good planning input.
bobthenavigator is offline  
Old Jul 12th, 2004 | 11:56 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,076
Likes: 0
I agree with bob's suggested itinerary.

If you really feel like a hard-charger and want to squeeze in a fifth destination in your two weeks, I'd say deduct one night each from Florence, CT and Venice and spend 3 nights on Lake Como between your stays in CT and Venice.

That might be a bit too much overall, but it's a nice sampling of top-notch destinations.
mr_go is offline  
Old Jul 14th, 2004 | 12:21 AM
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
I?m a fashion designer. That?s why I?d love to go to Milan. Joking, ha ha ha? I thought Milan is the only gateway to Lake Como.

Thanks to all and every one of you. Finally I?ve got a reasonable (yet ambitious) itinerary. I?ll consider flying to London from a quieter airport (yep, I hate crowds). And will do more research on Bob.

Submitting a holiday break request soon. Wish me luck!
JanePost is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff_Rome
Europe
4
Jan 4th, 2007 06:38 PM
singer8
Europe
34
Jan 3rd, 2007 01:04 PM
dragonflymom
Europe
9
Apr 11th, 2005 04:57 PM
Morris2004
Europe
10
Feb 2nd, 2005 02:30 PM
mdtravel
Europe
7
May 1st, 2003 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -