Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Is 50 min. enough time to make a connection in Chicago (ORD)?

Search

Is 50 min. enough time to make a connection in Chicago (ORD)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 04:39 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Is 50 min. enough time to make a connection in Chicago (ORD)?

I am booked on a United flight originating at LAX to Amsterdam with a plane change in Chicago- with only 50 min. between planes. I didn't question it because I assumed that United wouldn't schedule a ticket without enough time to make a connection. Having read some of the threads on this website though, I am beginning to worry. Why would United do this? Do I have a chance?
pandaschu is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 04:44 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Probably not because you have to change terminals! Assuming your flight is ontime, you need to take the train all the way to the international terminal and then go through security again. You shuld call the ticket agent again and ask for a change.
Grasshopper is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 04:52 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
I totally agree with Grasshopper. Used to live in Chicago and traveled quite a bit out of ORD. If your flight is a couple of minutes late into ORD you probably will miss your connection.

I would definitely call the agent and try to change. Good Luck!!
hacsutton is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 04:52 PM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,188
Likes: 0
Can you stand by for an earlier flight on the LAX-ORD leg? Last time I flew United (but on a different route), you could stand by, and if lucky, get on an earlier flight for free. However, planes are crowded nowadays, and I wasn't able to get on an earlier flight.

Of course if they will change it, that's best of all.
WillTravel is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:26 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
There's no terminal change on your outbound flight LAX-ORD-AMS. All flights will be using Terminal 1, concourse B or C. 50 minutes is allowed, and is legal.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:29 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
I'm pretty sure that I had a terminal change when I did United SFO to ORD to AMS.
Grasshopper is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:32 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
If you miss your flight, know that there are two other UA flights to London later in the day, also two UA codeshares operated by Lufthansa to Frankfurt, which they can put you on to get to Amsterdam.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,067
Likes: 0

I could be way off base, but I was thinking United's international flights only <i>arrive</i> at the Int'l terminal (Terminal 5). United's main terminal is #1. Just to check my sanity, I looked on United.com for today's flight status. Every LAX-ORD flight arrived in Terminal 1, either B or C concourse. Every ORD-AMS flight departed O'Hare from Terminal 1, concourse C.

So, it's likely that you will arrive and depart in the same terminal and not go through any check points. But you don't have much room for flight delays. Double check with United though.

Here's a map of Terminal 1 at O'Hare.

http://www.ohare.com/ohare/airlines/airlines_term1.shtm

Clifton is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Grasshopper - Are you thinking about the return flight? My own experience, as well as all indication on UA's website, suggest that all international flight departs Terminal 1. Are you simply thinking about changing from Concourse B to C, or vice versa?
rkkwan is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:39 PM
  #10  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
RK, I agree that the International flights depart from Terminal 1. But I think my SFO to ORD arrived in a different terminal. I remember taking the train.
Grasshopper is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #11  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,067
Likes: 0

Grasshopper, I just did the little flight status thing again (rkkwan has this stuff down, I had to go investigate)

Sure enough, the SFO flights are arriving at ORD at T3.
Clifton is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,067
Likes: 0
Ack, never mind. Was looking at the SFO column. They're arriving at T1 at ORD today. Could have been having problems at the assigned gate on your trip and shuffled you. That's happened to me a bunch of times.
Clifton is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
I appreciate all of the immediate feedback.

I just called United and the agent told me that both the arrival and departure were terminal 1, and that it wouldn't be a problem. (She was practically laughing at me for being worried). If I want to change it the cost is $100- on top of a ticket that I already paid too much for.

rkkwan- thanks for the info on the flights to London, that makes me feel a bit better. I am travelling on my own and don't want to spend the night in Chicago (never been) on my own.

pandaschu is offline  
Old Jun 9th, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #14  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Thanks Clifton. You know how we San Franciscans like to be different!
Grasshopper is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LBloom
Air Travel
7
Feb 14th, 2012 08:18 AM
friesjm
Air Travel
6
May 8th, 2011 12:12 PM
shelleyk
Air Travel
4
Oct 14th, 2010 03:55 PM
irishdame
Air Travel
16
Jun 23rd, 2005 07:00 AM
jill_h
United States
4
Apr 16th, 2004 05:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -