Avoid The Stewart Hotel, Scotland

Aug 23rd, 2007, 08:06 AM
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3
Avoid The Stewart Hotel, Scotland

Our itinerary said we were to stay 2 nights in "the beautiful city of Oban", but instead, we were put in a disgusting hotel 30+ minutes drive from Oban, called The Stewart Hotel. The problems are far too numerous to list here, but just a few: no heat, no hot water, the light in the bathroom was a bare bulb hanging on an electrical wire, no mirrors (my husband put in his contacts using my lipstick mirror!), no clock, radio or TV (although they were listed in the brochure), the slider to the deck was broken, construction dust was everywhere, no porters, bar prices were extremely high and varied according to who served .. . I could continue, but I'm sure you get the message.

It was abundantly clear that no one from Trafalgar had visited the hotel, OR, if they did and accepted it as suitable accommodations for passengers, then it makes a lie out of the statement on their web site: "A good night's sleep and a comfortable place to relax are invaluable when on vacation. All Trafalgar Hotels are carefully selected so you'll enjoy comfortable rooms and quality amenities. "
darmal is offline  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 08:24 AM
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,433
I am constantly surprised by the phenomenon of people whose first post to a travel forum an "avoid x" message.
Padraig is offline  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 08:36 AM
Posts: n/a
Have you contacted Trafalgar to explain your experiance or are you trying to get results here?
Aug 23rd, 2007, 09:15 AM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 332
Looks like it's under new management....and the new owners are not doing a very good job.
Always check Trip Advisor.....they will usually have the scoop.
jewela is offline  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 10:21 AM
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 63,918
yet another hit and run first post.

(How on earth would tripadvisor be of help? - darmal has a complaint with Trafalgar Tours. TA isn't much help if the tour company chooses the hotel . . . . )
janisj is online now  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 10:30 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 91,390
People on the forum would pay more attention to your complaint, if you weren't brand new here, and this is the very first thing you have to say to us.

That's why lots of people don't go on organized tours, because of lousy hotels included.

Next time, plan your own trip and avoid the disappointment.
suze is online now  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 10:30 AM
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
I would ask for a partial refund from Trafalgar.

Did you complain at the time? Take names? Take any photos? All would help strengthen your case.

If that doesn't work try Conde Nast Traveler ombudsman - they often get results.
nytraveler is offline  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 10:45 AM
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 671
"yet another hit and run first post."

Isn't it a bit early to dub this a "hit and run" post seeing that the OP posted only a few hour ago?

Some can't post and check for replies at work...like I'm doing...doh!
Wekiva is online now  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 10:58 AM
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 63,918
It IS the first post. darmal registered to post this.

Now IF she had taken the time to tell us about their trip - or ANYTHING at all other than this, we might not be so skeptical.
janisj is online now  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 11:11 AM
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 671
Fine...I'll agree with the "HIT" part...just not the "RUN" part yet.
Wekiva is online now  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 11:14 AM
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 63,918
fair enough . . . .
janisj is online now  
Aug 23rd, 2007, 12:04 PM
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,154
Why so sceptical?

We all occasionally encounter rotten goods or services. I'm sure all of us feel pretty strongly tempted to proclaim the rottenness of the good or service from every real (and cyber-) rooftop on the planet.

Not always the most productive way of going about things. But very often the first thing that comes into our heads.

It's certainly true that darmal ought to be moaning about the pillocks who booked him or her in. But that's no reason for doubting his or her bonae fides. I've stayed in enough McFawlty Towers in Scotland to find it pretty easy to believe The Stewart's a dump.

I'd strongly recommend a motto for all of us:

By all means correct other posters. But, unless there's really good evidence to the contrary (like those "I've just discovered this wonderful hotel in Tuvalu" posts from someone with an email address ending in .tv), assume good will. Though not necessarily sanity, accuracy or familiarity with the English language.
flanneruk is offline  
Aug 24th, 2007, 03:15 AM
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,282
As others have said, you need to resaech where you're going first, even if - or especially if - you are trusting someone else to choose it.

Anyway, treating this as possibly useful advice... Scotland is an actual country you know, not that small and I dare say there is more than one Stewart Hotel - which one do you mean ? the one in Appin ?

If it's any consolation, Oban is not a city and I certainly don't regard it as beautiful - I'd say Appin is nicer. Sorry the hotel wasn't nice, though.
caroline_edinburgh is offline  
Aug 24th, 2007, 03:26 AM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,351
I would guess from the Trip Advisor reports that it is indeed the one in Appin. It sounds from those report as if Basil Fawlty is alive and well and owns the Stewart Hotel, Appin.
hetismij is offline  
Aug 24th, 2007, 03:50 AM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,057
The Trip Advisor page is worth reading for it's comedy value alone:


Looks like the OP's problem was not unique!
audere_est_facere is offline  
Aug 24th, 2007, 04:20 AM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,301
I have a hard time understanding why it is considered bad form to post a complaint here, when posting for the first time. Perhaps darmal told a friend about the hotel and the friend recommended posting it on here to warn people. Perhaps several of the Trafalgar travelers talked about the problem and named various places to vent and warn others. Why do some people see negative posts as suspect? And why be so mean and proprietory (about this forum) in responding?

This isn't called "Fodor's Happy Posts only Until the Regulars Here Get to Know and Trust You" Forum.

Geez, I've been posting on here for about 8 years and I'm just fed up with people telling newbies how to post, how to title their post and checking all new names to see if they have ever posted before, then "outing" them as new and, therefore (for some reason), not to be trusted. There's no logic in that line of thinking. It only serves to make new contributors feel bad and keeps others from posting negative (and possibly helpful) information.

MelJ is offline  
Aug 24th, 2007, 05:25 AM
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,433
MelJ, I think much of your ire (if that is what it is) is misplaced.

A number of regulars advise newcomers on how to post, and particularly on how to title their post, so as to have the best chance of getting useful responses. That is good rather than bad. Yet when I first joined this forum a few months ago I was not "outed" or told how to post; perhaps that is because I have years of experience in online forums, and know my way around. Some people seem to need guidance, and others do not.

I presume my response to darmal's post was one of those that you find objectionable.
- First, I would point out that it was a general remark made in conversational mode, and not any kind of attack on darmal.
- Second, people here are influenced in their decisions by what they read here, even though relatively few of us know one another personally. I would generally give more weight to the opinions of regulars about whose tastes I have had the opportunity to make some judgement. Is there anything wrong with that?
- Third, it sometimes happens (not very obviously on this forum, I admit) that a negative comment is posted by a competitor rather than by a bona fide customer. One needs to be alert to the possibility that the motive for *any* post might not be fair-minded and honest.

Anyway, I see nothing wrong in our discussing the workings of this forum. That's what you have been doing, isn't it?
Padraig is offline  
Aug 24th, 2007, 05:53 AM
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 49,521
According to Trip Advisor's reviews 11 out of 15 reviewers rated the hotel as awful or very bad. Sounds like the poster has a legitimate complaint.
I think this poster was trying to warn others so they can avoid the problems they encountered
nanabee is offline  
Aug 24th, 2007, 06:56 AM
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 398
Thanks for the heads up. Sounds just really bad. Surprised that a well know travel company wouldn't refund part of the cost of the trip. Have you and others expressed your thoughts?
rogerdodger is offline  
Aug 24th, 2007, 07:13 AM
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 673
Well said, MelJ.

Bloom is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:17 AM.