athens or rome?
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
athens or rome?
We have a daughter who will be studying abroad next semester in both Greece and Rome. We would like to visit her but don't know which place to go. We have never been to either place. She will be in Greece in September and October, and then in Rome in November and December. Which would you choose and why? We would like to stay for a week or a little longer. Thanks!!!!
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
I would choose Rome. I studied in Italy for a semester of college, and for our spring break we went to Athens in February and spent about 7 days there. I liked Rome better, because Athens has bad air quality and is extremely busy, at all hours of the day. Rome at least feels a little more spread out and is a great city to walk in. Either place is worth visiting at some point, though, but my vote is definitely Rome.
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
No, we would have to go to Athens if we go in October or Rome if we go in November or December because our daughter will be there at those times. I am leaning towards Greece simply because I believe the weather will be nicer there in October than in Rome in November. Anyone else have an answer to my question - where shall we go, Rome or Athens?
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Have been to both. As mentioned above, Athans itself is only worth a couple of days. I did enjoy it, but spent most of my time on the islands or inland. It also has gridlock from 6 am until midnight. Rome, on the other hand, is worth a couple of weeks in the city itself. I totally fell in love with it.<BR>
Trending Topics
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Rome and Athens are hard to compare. I think each is great but in different ways. Athens is in many respects a third world city, with a lot of sprawl, some visible poverty in spots, heavy traffic congestion (although the newly extended subway makes it easier to get around); all sitting side by side with what I think are the most amazing remains of Western civilization - - at its very birth. The Acropolis is extraordinary: a high bare mesa in the middle of the city consisting entirely of 4th and 5th century BC buildings. They're more isolated and, I think, more beautiful than the Roman forum or other ancient buildings in Rome. The Plaka has a lot of tourist schlock, but it has very pretty streets and good restaurants as well, and the archaeological museum is the best of its kind. Finally, the new subway station in Constitution Square is almost worth the trip itself. It has exhibits of what was found during excavation, giving you a clear sense of the history you're walking on throughout Athens.
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
I would choose Rome, because there is a bit more to see in Rome than Athens. Athens has the Acropolis and the Plaka and a really nice museum, but other than that it's a big modern city. Rome has many different walking areas and it's easier to slow down and savor the Italian way of life there.
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
OK, heres an angle... which type of food do you like better??? Which period of history moves you more???<BR>We have been to both and I would choose Rome hands down, a hundred times. But Roman history is far more interesting to me personally,,, (very much a personal choice) and as for food.. well.. I really hate feta cheese, despite the fact that millions of people RAVE about Greek food.. I can't stand it... Italian food on the other hand is a big favorite for both myself and my husband.. I plan to go back to Rome, but I seriously doubt I would plan a second trip to Athens. Just IMHO
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nevertooold
Europe
2
Apr 17th, 2005 06:59 AM



