Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Travel Topics > Cruises
Reload this Page >

Celebrity or Princess

Search

Celebrity or Princess

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6th, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Celebrity or Princess

I'm going to Alaska in August 2008 with a land package to Denali and choosing between Celebrity Millenium or the Coral Princess.
Any suggestions?
rich99 is offline  
Old Sep 6th, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,219
Likes: 0
We think Celebrity and Princess are equivalent in quality, each doing some things better than the other.

We choose Princess because of the anytime dining; we just prefer not to eat at the same time every evening(early seating is too early and late seating is too late) with the same people.
abram is offline  
Old Sep 7th, 2007 | 02:02 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
I would choose Princess in a heart beat on this trip. Princess has permits to Glacier Bay. Celebrity would love to have them but they do not. Princess has 2 glacier days on that trip (which is nice incase you can not get into one as I couldn't get into Hubbard on one trip). Also, Barbara is a top notch naturalist and she has been on the Coral Princess every summer since the ship came out.

Make sure you pick a land package with the Tundra Tour at Denali or if you don't - make sure you can upgrade to it.

Also - Celebrity has an intermittant problems with their MIllennium class ships and every summer they have to cancel at least one sailing and another sailing is greatly affected. If this truly is a once in a lifetime trip, I would probably avoid the Millennium class as Celebrity has very little notice when this problem surfaces.
Theresa is offline  
Old Sep 7th, 2007 | 04:28 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,469
Likes: 0
You need to look over and determine which itinerary offers you what you want out of Alaska. Hubbard glacier is great and so is Hoonah, which is Celebrity, and Seward, for INDPENDENT tourist is a gem- sorry, but with a cruisetour, you are missing a fantastic opportunity.

Princess is fantastic in their itineraries with Glacier Bay and College Fjords, Celebrity essentially has a sea day.

Make a list and go with your priority.

As for the land tour, BE CERTAIN to understand fully EVERYTHING you are purchasing. MOST people do not. Do your homework, figure out distances, inclusions and again, what you think you want out of this touring. In my opinion, point to point fixed scheduled group touring is not ideal in Alaska.

As a consideration, it is simple to also go on your own, so compare and make those lists.
BudgetQueen is offline  
Old Sep 7th, 2007 | 04:53 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,899
Likes: 0
These are both nice sized ships and one thing to consider is if the itinerary weighs more heavily than the ship.

For me,the ship is really important. I like Celebrity for the traditional feel of their ships, their service, the Aqua Spa Cafe (my choice for lunch and dinner), their spacious gym and open decks, and the T pool.

I would hesitate with the Millie due to its history of pod problems though and you should visit cruisecritic and read about those before making a final decision.

Coral Priness will offer open dining and Millie does not.

Millie offer full breakfast, lunch and dinner menus served via room service, Princess does not unless you are in a suite (not even sure if it is very extensive then). In Alaska, we use room service a lot, due to the long days of light and the fantastic views from the balcony. We like to have breakfast in the cabin every morning and coffee and pastries does not constitute a healthy breakfast IMO.

IMO, cruisecritic is a better source on info so suggest you visit there.

kfusto is offline  
Old Sep 7th, 2007 | 10:54 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Once again - personal preference - but I would go Celebrity. I took the Summit this year to Alaska, and I loved it. If you want a traditional cruise - go Celebrity (they go to Hubbard bay - gorgeous glaciers there, as well), if you want more casual - you would probably go Princess. I've been on the Coral Princess, it's okay, but I liked Celebrity alot better than I liked Princess - especially the service. I'm sure both are great...
Debi is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2007 | 09:53 AM
  #7  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Not to complicate your situation further, but I love princess! We have cruised on 3 of their ships for a total of 5 cruises(Grand P., Diamond P., and Coral - which I liked the least)
We have also travelled on Costa and Crystal (which is the best, but not always affordable!)
I love princess's approach with the anytime dining, superb service and great itineraries
We took their alaska cruise a few years ago and loved it
dperry is offline  
Old Sep 13th, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #8  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
When I say I liked the Coral Princess the least it's because it's a smaller ship
I prefer the larger ships.
The Coral Princess was in excellent condition, we had a beautiful mini suite and the food was delicious.
dperry is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
esqsue
Cruises
16
Sep 2nd, 2006 12:07 PM
Frank
Cruises
8
Dec 11th, 2005 04:17 AM
mary54
Cruises
7
Aug 19th, 2004 05:48 PM
sjoantwe
Cruises
28
May 4th, 2004 02:43 PM
ezmark
Cruises
4
Oct 7th, 2003 06:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -