travelling from Australia to New York

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 23rd, 2012 | 09:15 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
travelling from Australia to New York

Would like to know how some of you managed a long haul to New York. Wondering if we should break the trip for a night or save the hotel cost and time and just get to our destination and have that extra day to relax in NY.
My husband is a smoker. Any smokers who have flown Qantas to New York, did you have enough time in LA to be able to go outside for a smoke and get through security before reboarding for next leg.

Any thoughts would be helpful
october_fun is offline  
Old Jun 23rd, 2012 | 09:27 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Definitely break the trip. I travelled to the U.S from Sydney in February this year and had a couple of days in L.A before doing another 5 hours to New York. I figured the cost of a hotel for a day or so was a far better option than the pain of all that flying non stop.

I wouldnt contemplate doing the whole long hual trip unless it was so important that you had to get there ASAP.

Even a day in L.A would be good.....plenty to see and do before you get to NYC.
gary062 is offline  
Old Jun 23rd, 2012 | 10:16 PM
  #3  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,344
Likes: 19
We are flying to NYC in November, but are breaking the trip by staying three days in San Francisco on the way.
nelsonian is offline  
Old Jun 24th, 2012 | 12:03 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
I agree with the above. I stopped over in San Fran and felt much better for it when I arrived the next day in NYC.
Peteralan is offline  
Old Jun 24th, 2012 | 01:21 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 0
Both SF and LA are interesting. But I suggest you stopover in San Francisco. The airport is less daunting than LAX. Plus, you can conveniently catch the BART train from the airport right into the city.

If you stay in the city (I recommend staying at or near the Embarcadero), then you don't even need to rent a car. You will be close to public transit or can even just walk to many top sites, such as restaurants, museums, the baseball stadium, concert halls, Coit Tower, Chinatown, the downtown shopping district.

October is the BEST time to be in San Francisco in terms of weather and activities. There is so much going on: Fleet Week, classical music (world class symphony and opera), jazz, baseball, football, whale watching season. You won't be bored.
Diamantina is offline  
Old Jun 24th, 2012 | 01:26 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 0
But if you do not want to lose time in California or if costs are your concern, then just continue on.
Diamantina is offline  
Old Jun 24th, 2012 | 07:14 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,039
Likes: 0
As one who has made this trip in the opposite direction (Washington D.C. to Sydney) on several occasions, I think the answer is...it depends.

If you only intend an overnight stay someplace between Sydney and NYC, I would say that it is definitely NOT worth it. Once we decided to do an overnight in L.A. to break up the trip between D.C. and Sydney. That turned out to be a big mistake because it just involved a lot more logistical problems--dealing with baggage an extra time, dealing with TSA (security) an extra time, dealing with transportation in LA from the airport to the hotel, dealing with costs of a hotel near the airport in LA, etc. We felt no more rested upon our arrival in Sydney after this layover than the times we flew from D.C. without including an overnight stay anywhere. (And it deprived us of an extra day in Sydney!)

However, if your travel plans include California anyway and you have AT LEAST 3 days for your layover, then I would stop before continuing on to NYC.
longhorn55 is offline  
Old Jun 24th, 2012 | 10:00 PM
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
longhorn thanks, those reasons you have given are exactly why I have been tossing up whether or not to stayover.

We were going to stay in SF originally but with work only renewing contracts for 6months I decided to shorten the holiday a little to keep costs down. When I checked fares on the weekend, the airline has dropped the prices for the latter half of october - if we leave on the 11th instead of the 7th we save $800. (too good a saving to ignore) So if we have a stop it can only be for 1 night as we cant move our holidays later. I am going to allow an extra two days in NY instead so that we can take it easy the first two days and explore at leisure rather than rushing to fit everything in. We wont venture too far and if we are still tired we can go back to the hotel for a nana nap.
My husband can sleep on a barbed wire fence so he will have no trouble sleeping on a plane. As soon as he sits still for an hour he is asleep!
october_fun is offline  
Old Jun 25th, 2012 | 12:01 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,547
Likes: 4
I've only done the straight-through run JFK-SYD & don't find it too much of a hassle.

With an evening flight out of JFK, it's pretty easy to have dinner, read etc., to LAX & then sleep on the next leg home.

Mind you, I'm a bit like your husband - could sleep on a railway track.

Unless there's a transit hotel where I can stay overnight without all the customs & immigration messing about, I'd only do a stop over if it were for a few days somewhere I particularly wanted to go.
Bokhara2 is offline  
Old Jun 25th, 2012 | 02:51 AM
  #10  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,174
Likes: 83
I'm with longhorn and Bokhara (except I can't sleep for beans).

I fly from Perth to Colorado once or twice a year and I've done it both ways...straight through and breaking it up. One night really isn't worth the hassle, unless you can stay at a transit hotel IN the airport (like Changi in Singapore).

If you can avoid LAX, do it. That airport is miserable and the gatekeepers have a well deserved reputation of being harsh and unwelcoming.
Melnq8 is offline  
Old Jun 28th, 2012 | 03:25 PM
  #11  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,864
Likes: 0
I do this trip at least yearly- well from Melbourne and always go straight through.Then again I am not a smoker but I would always rather go straight to the place that is my destination.
Coming back form Ny on Qantas is good becasue you are flying thru the night.
northie is offline  
Old Jun 29th, 2012 | 02:25 AM
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Thank you everyone for your comments. As we could only have an overnight stop on the way over I have decided to go straight through and save the hassle of airport transfers, hotel costs etc. I have booked the extra day in New York so we can take it easy the day after the flight and just explore close to the hotel.

The trip home is fine. We will be leaving from Vegas so a quick flight to LA then Qantas through the night. I am hoping that on the layover at LAX hubby might have time to race outside, have a smoke and race back in and hopefully with no bags he could get through security a bit quicker. As I dont know what the security lines are like does anyone know if there would be sufficient time for him to do that. there would be about 2 hrs between touchdown and take off.

Once again, thank you everyone.
october_fun is offline  
Old Jul 4th, 2012 | 09:29 PM
  #13  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Hi october_fun: sorry I missed your original post but I agree with the plan to go straight through. I have just done this trip both ways and had only 7 days in beteweenn in New York. (Mind you I don't seem to need as much sleep as others). I always prefer just to get to the final destination and suck up the discomofrt on the way for more time at the destination.

Regarding the amount of time in LAX - WE flew on QF 107 - the one that goes straight through from Sydney to JFK, stopping at LAX. In the beginning of June the queues were fine and the security lines were reasonably quick. But there was not a long waiting time before boarding. You have to disembark, clear customs, clear your bags and then go back through security. All takes a bit of time. There would have been enough time to have a quick cigarette BUT I would not have risked going outside the airport but that is because in the past I have been in security lines out the door at LAX and we literally had to run out the door.

You will have to judge on the day.
aussiefive is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rachel_k_cassar
United States
4
Jul 8th, 2013 09:29 AM
daddypop
United States
11
Sep 18th, 2012 01:15 AM
CBTravler
United States
4
Jul 8th, 2007 05:32 PM
Daneille
United States
4
May 3rd, 2007 02:37 AM
nelsonian
United States
7
Dec 5th, 2006 08:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -