Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Asia
Reload this Page >

malaria medications?

Search

malaria medications?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10th, 2006 | 09:34 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
malaria medications?

Any thoughts on whether I need to take medications to prevent malaria on a 4 day trip to see Angkor? CDC recommends it, but my guidebooks don't... Does anyone have opinions?
mimimi9 is offline  
Old Oct 10th, 2006 | 09:56 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 33,288
Likes: 0
Siem Reap is a malarial risk area. Make sure you know the issues about choosing whether or not to take anti-malarials. Do consult with a doctor about this.

For such a short trip, malarone makes the most sense as you only start it the day before entering the malarial risk area and only continue it for one week after leaving the area.

Personally, I do choose to take anti-malarials when I am in a malarial risk area.
Kathie is offline  
Old Oct 10th, 2006 | 10:32 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
What have you got to lose? I've read that there are areas immediately around the Temples where the mosquitos hang out so I do plan to go the Doxycycline route when I'm in Siem Reap for three weeks in January, mostly because of the temple/mosquito issue. Doxy is my choice as its a substitute for the tetracycline I take every day for rosecea so I can kill two birds (or diseases) with one stone! For the few to no side-effects, take away the worries!
Cookiew is offline  
Old Oct 10th, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,664
Likes: 0
When we went to AW last year. we took malarone. Many mosquito bites, no Malaria or side effects. Some temples are more swampy than others. I got bit hanging around the pool at the hotel in SR. It's your decision.
Gpanda is offline  
Old Oct 10th, 2006 | 11:50 AM
  #5  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 13,860
Likes: 0
I've taken Malarone...while in Ghana...However, just remember that there are no guarantees of not getting malaria just because one is on the drugs. So, you still need to cover up. Happy Travels!
Guenmai is offline  
Old Oct 10th, 2006 | 03:07 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 33,288
Likes: 0
So true, Guenmai, anti-malarials are more than 95% effective, but it is worthwhile to remember that there are other illnesses carried by mosquitoes as well, including dengue. SO a good repellant and covering up are good advice.
Kathie is offline  
Old Oct 10th, 2006 | 09:46 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Once I was in India and felt nauseous and thought it was something I ate. Then I realised it was the anti-malaria medication. These days I just use insect repellect,just a personal choice but not a recommendation. I am in SE Asia about 3 times a year and have also travelled to India without such medication.
Cilla_Tey is offline  
Old Oct 11th, 2006 | 05:51 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 33,288
Likes: 0
Do note that only parts of India and SE Asia are malarial risk. There are many places where you don't need anti-malarials.
Kathie is offline  
Old Oct 11th, 2006 | 10:36 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
If you have seen anyone with malaria you would not even hesitate to take some type of prevention. Malarone is easy to take and very few people have a reaction. If taken with food it works better(We take it at breakfast) to prevent nausea. Follow up with deet and long clothing
kmkrnn is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmvp
Asia
20
Oct 5th, 2016 07:44 AM
sf7307
Asia
8
Aug 9th, 2010 07:46 PM
anniesf
Asia
6
Aug 2nd, 2007 08:17 AM
MHRS
Asia
12
Nov 22nd, 2005 06:42 PM
jodo
Asia
25
Oct 8th, 2003 11:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -