Luang Prabang or Siem Reap

Dec 29th, 2007, 05:05 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 776
Luang Prabang or Siem Reap

Because of the vagaries of air flights, I have a choice of spending 5 full days in Siem Reap/ 4 full days Luang Prabang or the reverse 4 days SR and 5 days LP.
Based on your experiences, which would you recommend. I am a very outdoors person, enjoying hikes/treks, etc.
I also enjoy soaking up local culture/history and am a believer of of the slow travel principle. I am staying in locally owned hotels/guesthouses while in each place.

P.S. Thanks to all who are posting their trip reports. I am enjoying them and gleaning ideas from them.
nibblette is offline  
Dec 29th, 2007, 05:32 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,988
If you at all interested in the temples at Angkor, I'd spend the longer time in Siem Reap. There are dozens of acccessible temples, and there is no way you will see all of them. We spent a week there and could have spent more time. We also loved LP. It's more of a soaking up the atmosphere kind of place.
Kathie is offline  
Dec 29th, 2007, 06:03 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,282
As Kathie said, it all depends on your interests. If you love temples and/or archeology spend the longer time in Siem reap.
glorialf is offline  
Dec 29th, 2007, 06:37 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,138
I think there's more to keep you busy in SR, so I'd spend more time there.
Femi is offline  
Dec 30th, 2007, 02:30 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,892
Based on your preference for outdoors experiences (hiking, trekking), I would look into spending more time in Luang Prabang and environs. Laos is a beautiful country. We only had 3 days there but if we had had more time, we definitely would have spent it outside LP exploring the countryside.

The temple area around Siem Reap is vast and could keep you busy for many days but I didn't find it particularly attractive. There is also the danger of stepping on a land mine if you are away from the main roads and attractions.
Craig is offline  
Dec 30th, 2007, 04:34 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,282
Just reread your post and based on your interests I would spend the longer time in Luang Prabang.
glorialf is offline  
Dec 30th, 2007, 04:47 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,664
LP. The temples around SR are a unique experience, but a complete tourist experience. In LP, you can quickly get outside town into the countryside. I would skip the caves and take a boat up the river to some villages. We were the only westerners in each of the villages we visited. While there was clear commerce designed for westerners, it was refreshing not to be amongst a gaggle.
Gpanda is offline  
Dec 30th, 2007, 02:35 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 442
My vote is for LP too....The Temples in Siem Reap are awesome, but the terrain a bit dismal....LP does not offer the archeological "Wow" but is beautiful.....
jodo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wendy236
Asia
14
Aug 22nd, 2013 06:05 PM
RJames
Asia
9
Aug 17th, 2013 02:30 AM
lilypoo
Asia
6
Nov 27th, 2008 04:26 PM
sullivat
Asia
4
Apr 4th, 2006 05:14 AM
jane
Asia
24
Jan 19th, 2003 10:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -

FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:06 AM.