Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Asia
Reload this Page >

Is Sukhothai worth the extra trip?

Search

Is Sukhothai worth the extra trip?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1st, 2007 | 10:55 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Is Sukhothai worth the extra trip?

We will be at the Elephant Conservation Center near Lampang so I figured maybe we would get a driver and drive down to Sukhothai which would only be 127 miles and then taking the plane the next evening to BKK, instead of driving all of the way back 47 miles to Chiang Mai to catch a plane.

It looks great in my guidebooks, but maybe their are comprable areas around Chaing Mai or maybe within driving distance of BKK.

Any suggestions would be helpful.
Of course I don't know how fast the flight fill up back down to BKK. That could also be a factor. Our trip is in the middle of Sept. I am toying around with an Airpass from Bangkok Airways, but I was unsure if you are able to book all of your flights before you leave. I don't want to leave things like that up to chance, since we will be traveling with kids. Is it really hard to actually get the airpass seats? There will be 5 of us.

Thanks, Heather
HLester3 is offline  
Old Mar 2nd, 2007 | 04:26 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,773
Likes: 0
I was not terribly impressed with Sukothai. It seemed a bit like a theme park with manicured lawns all around the ruins. Having said that it was quite a plesant renting a couple of bikes and riding around the ruins. we also drove out into the countryside to some of the temples which was a nice way to spend a few hours. in essence, I would not go out of my way to visit.

We had a mix up with the rental car at Sukothai airport (they got the wrong day!) and being a Sunday we spent a lot of time at the airport waiting for them to turn up. A number of budget airlines operate from sukothai. When we were there was empty apart from the crowd of peole who had been told that their budget airline flight wasn't going to operate that day! Not sure about the airpass seats but suggest that if travelling with kids that you book before you go.
crellston is offline  
Old Mar 2nd, 2007 | 06:38 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
I thought Sukhothai Historical Park was one of the more impressive sights we saw in Thailand. If you think you would be impressed by seeing the Roman Forum you will be impressed by seeing Sukhothai. Sukhothai is extensive and spread out so if you go, I would plan to spend a minimum of 4 hours there,( but you could easily spend more.) I recommend seeing it with a guide , or at least a good guidebook, so you know what you are looking at. You will need transportation within Sukhothai, as it is very spread out. When I was there, I saw people bicycling through the site, but they looked hot and tired, so I would think twice about using this mode of transportation if you are really interested in concentrating on seeing the ruins. I can't help with the flight logistics as I saw Sukhothai as part of a bus tour through Thailand. As for comparable areas within driving distance to Bangkok, the only site that comes to mind is Ayuthea(?spelling), but IMO Sukhothai is much more impressive.
shelleyk is offline  
Old Mar 3rd, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #4  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
I loved it!
Was just there in january.
dperry is offline  
Old Mar 4th, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Thank you for all of your replies. I am still trying to decide. We are so tight on time, that I would have to cut short our sight seeing in Bangkok and Siem Reap to go here. Thank you for all of the information, because it will help me to mull it over. There are so many interesting places to see In Thialand, but then we only have 1 week.
Thanks again, Heather
HLester3 is offline  
Old Mar 4th, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
As interesting as I think Sukhothai is, I would not take time away from Bangkok or SR if you only have one week.
shelleyk is offline  
Old Mar 4th, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 33,288
Likes: 0
If you are going to Siem Reap to visit Angkor, don't go to Sukothai this trip. It would really be anti-climactic after the temples at Angkor. Do make sure you've allowed anough time at Angkor. It takes a full three days just to see the major temples at Angkor. We spent a week at Angkor and din't see all of the accessible temples. Save Sukothai for another trip.
Kathie is offline  
Old Mar 4th, 2007 | 02:31 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
If you're heart and itenerary is set on the other areas, then I would recommend you spend more time in those areas than trying to squeeze in an extra side trip. That said, Bangkok's charm is lost on me, so I would definitely cut short time there for Sukothai - I loved my two days there and second the recommendation to rent bikes and pack a lunch. As for Angkor Wat, it was a completely different kingdom and culture (though there's at least Khmer era ruins at Sukothai).

http://www.brucegcollier.com/galleri...level2_all.htm -- Sukothai photos at top of list

Regards, Bruce
www.brucegcollier.com -- Fine-art Travel Photography
bg_collier is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cmstraf
Asia
31
May 19th, 2015 02:58 AM
gopp
Asia
15
Jan 8th, 2010 05:25 PM
dgunbug
Asia
7
Jul 30th, 2008 11:09 AM
Travelegs
Asia
8
Aug 13th, 2007 05:31 PM
alakshma
Asia
11
Jun 6th, 2005 04:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -