Switched from 757 to AB6

Oct 7th, 2005, 11:45 AM
  #1  
cdt
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 741
Switched from 757 to AB6

What the heck is an AB6, anyway? I don't think I've ever flown on one.

I booked a nonstop on American from JFK to Montego Bay a few weeks ago and chose seats as far forward as I could get them - on a 757.

Glad I happened to look at it today - they've changed it to an AB6 and moved me to seats much farther back. Fortunately I was able to re-select seats farther forward.

Should I be happy this was changed to an AB6, or unhappy?
cdt is offline  
Oct 7th, 2005, 12:02 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,032
AB6 is an Airbus 300-600
NoFlyZone is offline  
Oct 7th, 2005, 12:38 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
It is a wide-body, so actually you are on a bigger plane.

AA uses these primerly to the Carribean.

http://www.aa.com/content/aboutUs/ourPlanes/AirbusA300.jhtml
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
Oct 7th, 2005, 12:43 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
And also check www.seatguru.com</> for best seat recommendation.
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
Oct 7th, 2005, 12:47 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
primarily - primerly???
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
Oct 7th, 2005, 03:59 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
AAFF - Speaking of AA's AB6, do you remember what's the rationale for them to buy those 35 planes? I always find it odd for them to get those since they were already flying a lot of 767s, and the DC-10s are still doing okay back in the late 80's.

So why introduce another type of widebody?

Well, I know AA didn't care about fleet commonality too much back then. There were ordering Airbus, Fokker, M-D, and Boeing back then... Still...
rkkwan is offline  
Oct 7th, 2005, 04:12 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
To be honest with you, I really don't know, but,

I do remember reading something along the lines that they got an incredible deal, just not sure if it was from Airbus directly, or from Boeing.
The Boeing thing, if it happened that way, was a "trade-in" deal from another airline. (yes folks, airplanes are sold out of the used lots too )

I could be totally wrong on this.
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
Oct 7th, 2005, 04:44 PM
  #8  
cdt
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 741
Looks like one plus is that there are two of us flying, and we get two seats to ourselves, instead of sharing with a third person.

Of course, who knows how many more times they'll change before our trip (they already changed departure and return by about one hour each).
cdt is offline  
Oct 7th, 2005, 06:00 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
cdt - Sorry for hijacking this thread, but at least I'm bringing it to the top.

AAFF - I checked the database on planespotters.net, and it seems like all the AA AB6s were delivered new to them. So, I don't think they were resold by Boeing (like SQ's old A340-300s, more recently).
rkkwan is offline  
Oct 7th, 2005, 06:06 PM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
Airbus must have offered a deal AA could not refuse......
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
Nov 13th, 2005, 07:12 AM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,334
For my money, I prefer to fly on a Boeing plane. I just got off a two hour airbus flight last night (A320) and my back was KILLING ME!! I could hardly move for a while. It's better today, but still a bit sore. No question, it was the seat on the A320. These seats are not made for comfort, IMHO. The Airbus, to me, is extremely UNcomfortable. I've been on the larger Airbus planes also, and had the same feelings about seat comfort.

I am not looking forward to a longer flight from ORD to SJU for a New Years cruise!! It's a TED flight so no firstclass cabin. No upgrade possible UGH. The return flt if on a B767, which I MUCH prefer.
simpsonc510 is offline  
Nov 13th, 2005, 08:18 AM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
Seats are specified by the airline, not the plane manufacturer. A320 has a wider cabin than the 737, though both have a 3-3 seating layout.
rkkwan is offline  
Nov 14th, 2005, 07:49 AM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,379
rkkwan: RE: The American A300s-- I was under the assumption that American bought the jets along with the gates and routes from Eastern Airlines in the latter's liquidation Fire Sale. Wrong...?
rjw_lgb_ca is offline  
Nov 14th, 2005, 09:09 AM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
rjw - From what I read on planespotters.net, AA's A300 are all purchased new. Delivered from 88-89 onwards. And they are the -600 variety. Can't be from Eastern.
rkkwan is offline  
Nov 14th, 2005, 10:28 AM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,379
Hmmmm.... You're right. I wonder what kind of discount AA got from Airbus to fly the 300...?
rjw_lgb_ca is offline  
Nov 14th, 2005, 10:36 AM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,074
Well, not enough to stop AA from badmouthing Airbus after the crash in Queens, I guess.

Anyways, just want to revive a point I mentioned early in the thread. Bob Crandall had really gone crazy in the late 80's in getting all different aircrafts for specific routes. Type commonality means nothing to him.

During that time, they were flying:
727, 757, 747SP (two crafts specifically for AA60/61 DFW-NRT before the MD-11s arrived), 767, DC-10, MD-11, MD-80, A300, F100. How crazy is that?
rkkwan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -

FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:31 AM.